Search

Introduction: In the era of ambitious HIV targets, novel HIV testing models are required for hard-to-reach groups such as men, who remain underserved by existing services. Pregnancy presents a unique opportunity for partners to test for HIV, as many pregnant women will attend antenatal care (ANC). We describe the views of pregnant women and their male partners on HIV self-test kits that are woman-delivered, alone or with an additional intervention. Methods: A formative qualitative study to inform the design of a multi-arm multi-stage cluster-randomized trial, comprised of six focus group discussions and 20 in-depth interviews, was conducted. ANC attendees were purposively sampled on the day of initial clinic visit, while men were recruited after obtaining their contact information from their female partners. Data were analysed using content analysis, and our interpretation is hypothetical as participants were not offered self-test kits. Results: Providing HIV self-test kits to pregnant women to deliver to their male partners was highly acceptable to both women and men. Men preferred this approach compared with standard facility-based testing, as self-testing fits into their lifestyles which were characterized by extreme day-to-day economic pressures, including the need to raise money for food for their household daily. Men and women emphasized the need for careful communication before and after collection of the self-test kits in order to minimize the potential for intimate partner violence although physical violence was perceived as less likely to occur. Most men stated a preference to first self-test alone, followed by testing as a couple. Regarding interventions for optimizing linkage following self-testing, both men and women felt that a fixed financial incentive of approximately USD$2 would increase linkage. However, there were concerns that financial incentives of greater value may lead to multiple pregnancies and lack of child spacing. In this low-income setting, a lottery incentive was considered overly disappointing for those who receive nothing. Phone call reminders were preferred to short messaging service. Conclusions: Woman-delivered HIV self-testing through ANC was acceptable to pregnant women and their male partners. Feedback on additional linkage enablers will be used to alter pre-planned trial arms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In the era of ambitious HIV targets, novel HIV testing models are required for hard-to-reach groups such as men, who remain underserved by existing services. Pregnancy presents a unique opportunity for partners to test for HIV, as many pregnant women will attend antenatal care (ANC). We describe the views of pregnant women and their male partners on HIV self-test kits that are woman-delivered, alone or with an additional intervention. Methods: A formative qualitative study to inform the design of a multi-arm multi-stage cluster-randomized trial, comprised of six focus group discussions and 20 in-depth interviews, was conducted. ANC attendees were purposively sampled on the day of initial clinic visit, while men were recruited after obtaining their contact information from their female partners. Data were analysed using content analysis, and our interpretation is hypothetical as participants were not offered self-test kits. Results: Providing HIV self-test kits to pregnant women to deliver to their male partners was highly acceptable to both women and men. Men preferred this approach compared with standard facility-based testing, as self-testing fits into their lifestyles which were characterized by extreme day-to-day economic pressures, including the need to raise money for food for their household daily. Men and women emphasized the need for careful communication before and after collection of the self-test kits in order to minimize the potential for intimate partner violence although physical violence was perceived as less likely to occur. Most men stated a preference to first self-test alone, followed by testing as a couple. Regarding interventions for optimizing linkage following self-testing, both men and women felt that a fixed financial incentive of approximately USD$2 would increase linkage. However, there were concerns that financial incentives of greater value may lead to multiple pregnancies and lack of child spacing. In this low-income setting, a lottery incentive was considered overly disappointing for those who receive nothing. Phone call reminders were preferred to short messaging service. Conclusions: Woman-delivered HIV self-testing through ANC was acceptable to pregnant women and their male partners. Feedback on additional linkage enablers will be used to alter pre-planned trial arms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The Trinity Biotech Uni-Gold HIV test (Uni-Gold) is often used as a supplementary rapid test in testing algorithms. Objective To evaluate the operational performance of the Uni-Gold as a first-line screening test among gay and bisexual men (GBM) in a setting where 4th generation HIV laboratory assays are routinely used. Study design We compared the performance of Uni-Gold with conventional HIV serology conducted in parallel among GBM attending 22 testing sites. Sensitivity was calculated separately for acute and established infection, defined using 4th generation screening Ag/Ab immunoassay (EIA) and Western blot results. Previous HIV testing history and results of supplementary 3rd generation HIV Ab EIA, and p24 antigen EIA were used to further characterise cases of acute infection. Results Of 10,793 specimens tested with Uni-Gold and conventional serology, 94 (0.90%, 95%CI:0.70–1.07) were confirmed as HIV-positive by conventional serology, and 37 (39.4%) were classified as acute infection. Uni-Gold sensitivity was 81.9% overall (77/94, 95%CI:72.6–89.1); 56.8% for acute infection (21/37, 95%CI:39.5–72.9) and 98.2% for established infection (56/57, 95%CI:90.6–100.0). Of 17 false non-reactive Uni-Gold results, 16 were acute infections, and of these seven were p24 antigen reactive but antibody negative. Uni-Gold specificity was 99.9% (10,692/10,699, 95%CI:99.9–100.0), PPV was 91.7% (95%CI:83.6–96.6) and NPV was 99.8% (95%CI:99.7–99.9), respectively. Conclusions In this population, Uni-Gold had good specificity and sensitivity was high for established infections when compared to 4th generation laboratory assays, however sensitivity was lower in acute infections. Where rapid tests are used in populations with a high proportion of acute infections, additional testing strategies are needed to detect acute infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and objective The rapid test study was a real-time comparison of point-of-care (POC) HIV tests to determine their abilities to detect early HIV infection. Study design Men and transgender persons reporting sex with men in the prior year were recruited at the Public Health—Seattle & King County STD Clinic, Gay City Health Project, and University of Washington Primary Infection Clinic. Study tests included the OraQuick ADVANCE Rapid HIV-1/2 Antibody Test performed on oral fluids and tests performed on fingerstick whole blood specimens including OraQuick, Uni-Gold Recombigen HIV test, Determine HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab Combo, and INSTI HIV-1 Rapid Antibody Test. Specimens from subjects with negative results were sent for EIA and nucleic acid amplification testing. McNemar's exact tests compared the numbers of HIV-infected subjects detected. Results Between February 2010 and August 2014, there were 3438 study visits. Twenty-four subjects had discordant POC results with at least one reactive and one non-reactive test, including one subject with a reactive Determine p24 antigen. OraQuick performed on oral fluids identified fewer persons compared to all fingerstick tests. OraQuick performed on fingerstick whole blood detected fewer persons compared to the Determine Combo antibody component ( p = .008) and Combo overall ( p = .004), and there was a trend when compared to INSTI ( p = .06). The Determine Combo specificity was 98.99%. Conclusions As reported by others, Determine Combo underperforms compared to laboratory-based testing, but it did detect one acute infection. If these results are validated, the specificity of Determine Combo may limit its usefulness in populations with lower HIV incidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of AIDS & Behavior is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Summary: Objectives: To describe the population targeted for the rapid HIV testing program delivered via socio-culturally adapted services in primary care centers and to assess factors associated with uptake of first-time testing. Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. We analyzed consultations between April 29, 2010 and May 31, 2012. We assessed the differences in age, origin, education, and sexual history between men who have sex with men (MSM), heterosexual men (HM), and women, using a two-sided independent t-test and Chi-square statistics. Factors associated with first-time testing were analyzed by logistic regression. Results: Of 1940 consultations, 45.1% were HM, 25.4% MSM, and 29.5% women; 35.4% were immigrants, 2.5% were or had been sex workers, and 15.4% had visited one. The test was reactive in 2.1%. Up to 44.2% had never been tested. The probability of being tested for the first time increased in HM, women, populations from the Indian Subcontinent, those with no casual sexual partners, those whose partner's serostatus was unknown, and those with no history of other sexually transmitted infections. Conclusions: This program managed to reach a high proportion of vulnerable people. First time HIV testing rates were high. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of AIDS & Behavior is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Thirty-one gay and bisexual men were interviewed on the acceptability, potential use, benefits and limitations of rapid self-testing for HIV in Australia. The majority of men supported the introduction of rapid self-testing, and would be likely to, or would use the tests for home use. However, most reported they would use them for interim testing and not to replace conventional blood testing at health services as they could not detect other sexually transmitted infections or provide the professional expertise and support provided at health services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Early testing strategies such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) DNA and RNA assays have become popular, cheaper and reliable, however the measures of success of Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission (PMTCT) programs in predominantly breastfeeding populations often depend on long term follow-up and HIV testing of children. Diagnosis in PMTCT programs in resource-poor countries therefore remains dependent on serological assays. The use of rapid HIV tests in perinatal HIV diagnosis, as recommended by the WHO, was based on the sensitivity and specificity of the enzyme-linked immuno-assay (ELISA) in children and not guided by an independent evaluation of rapid tests. For the purpose of ensuring a reliable diagnosis of perinatal HIV infection in predominantly breastfed children and largely resource-poor settings in Sub-Saharan Africa, we evaluated a HIV rapid test against the ELISA in serial plasma samples. We tested stored plasma samples for HIV antibodies, using a rapid test (Abbott Determine HIV1/2, Abbott Diagnostics, Wiesbaden, Germany) from a cohort of children between 12 and 18 months of age, enrolled in the PETRA (perinatal transmission) study at the Durban site, and compared to pre-determined real-time ELISA results. Using the ELISA results at 18 months as gold standard, the sensitivity of the ELISA at 12 and 15 months was 100% (95% CI 79–100), and specificity improved from 90.4% (95% CI 86–94) at 12 months to 99.5% (95% CI 97–100) at 15 months. The sensitivity of the rapid HIV test when compared to ELISA results at 18 months was 100% (95% CI 46–98) at 12 and 15 months, and the specificity was 89% (95% CI 80–94) and 99% (95% CI 92–100) at 12 and 15 months respectively. The negative predictive values for the rapid test at 12, 15 and 18 months were 100% (95% CI 94–100). Using the 18 month ELISA as the gold standard, the rapid test at 12 and 15 months demonstrated similar specificities to the corresponding ELISA tests. We concluded that the sensitivity and specificity of the rapid HIV test remained optimal (100%) for the diagnosis of HIV infection in children at 18 months. The earlier use of a rapid test at 15 months correctly excluded HIV infection in 99% of the children. Any earlier use of rapid tests without subsequent confirmation could result in an estimated 10% or more children misdiagnosed as HIV infected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]