Search

Background Diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) usually relies on invasive samples, but it is unclear whether more patient-friendly tools are good alternatives for diverse lesions when used with polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Methods Patients with suspected CL were enrolled consecutively in a prospective diagnostic accuracy study. We compared dental broach, tape disc, and microbiopsy samples with PCR as index tests, using PCR with skin slit samples as reference test. Subsequently, we constructed a composite reference test including microscopy, the 3 index tests and skin slit PCR, and we compared these same tests with the composite reference test. We assessed diagnostic accuracy parameters with 95% confidence intervals for all comparisons. Results Among 344 included patients, 282 (82.0%) had CL diagnosed, and 62 (18.0%) CL absence, by skin slit PCR. The sensitivity and specificity by PCR were 89.0% (95% confidence interval, 84.8%–92.1%) and 58.1% (45.7%–69.5%), respectively, for dental broach, 96.1% (93.2%–97.8%) and 27.4% (17.9%–39.6%) for tape disc, and 74.8% (66.3%–81.7%) and 72.7% (51.8%–86.8%) for microbiopsy. Several reference test–negative patients were consistently positive with the index tests. Using the composite reference test, dental broach, and skin slit had similar diagnostic performance. Discussion Dental broach seems a less invasive but similarly accurate alternative to skin slit for diagnosing CL when using PCR. Tape discs lack specificity and seem unsuitable for CL diagnosis without cutoff. Reference tests for CL are problematic, since using a single reference test is likely to miss true cases, while composite reference tests are often biased and impractical as they require multiple tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Current sampling methods to diagnose cutaneous leishmaniasis are invasive and painful. An alternative and minimally invasive microbiopsy device was evaluated in a diverse range of cutaneous leishmaniasis lesions in Ethiopia. Using polymerase chain reaction–based diagnosis, the microbiopsy outperformed the routine skin slit sample by detecting more patients while pain scores were significantly lower. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Reports on treatment outcomes of visceral leishmaniasis (VL)-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection in India are lacking. To our knowledge, none have studied the efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B in VL-HIV coinfection. We report the 2-year treatment outcomes of VL-HIV-coinfected patients treated with liposomal amphotericin B followed by combination antiretroviral treatment (cART) in Bihar, India. Methods. The study included all patients with newly diagnosed VL-HIV coinfection and initiating treatment with liposomal amphotericin B (20-25 mg/kg in 4-15 days) between July 2007 and September 2010. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative incidence of death/treatment failure were calculated. Results. Fifty-five patients were included (83.6% male; median age, 35 years; 62% migrant laborers; median follow-up, 1 year). The median CD4 cell count at VL diagnosis was 66 cells/μL (interquartile range, 38-112). Twentyseven patients (49.1%) presented with VL relapse of VL. The overall tolerance of liposomal amphotericin B was excellent, with no interrupted treatment. Survival by 1 and 2 years after VL treatment was estimated at 85.5%. Nopatients had initial treatment failure. The probabilities of VL relapse were 0%, 8.1%, and 26.5% at 0.5, 1, and 2 years after VL treatment, respectively; relapse rates were similar for primary VL and VL relapse. CD4 counts<200 cells/μL at 6 months after cART initiation were predictive of subsequent relapse. The mean CD4 cell counts at 6 and 24 months after cART initiation were 187 and 261 cells/μL, respectively. The rate for retention in HIV care was 83.6%. Conclusions. Good long-term survival and retention rates were obtained for VL-HIV-coinfected patients treated with liposomal amphotericin B and cART. Although the initial VL treatment response was excellent, VL relapse within 2 years remained frequent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Visceral leishmaniasis (VL)-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection remains a major problem in Ethiopia, India, and Brazil. Tuberculosis (TB), a treatable factor, could contribute to high mortality (up to 25%) in VL-HIV coinfection. However, the current evidence on the prevalence and clinical impact of TB in VL-HIV coinfection is very limited. In previous reports on routine care, TB prevalence ranged from 5.7% to 29.7%, but information on how and when TB was diagnosed was lacking. Methods Field observations suggest that TB work-up is often not done systematically, and it is only done in patients who do not respond well to VL treatment. Here, we advocate high-quality diagnostic studies in VL-HIV-coinfected patients, during which all patients are systematically screened for TB, including a comprehensive work-up, to obtain reliable estimates. Results Cost-effective and feasible diagnostic algorithms can be developed for field use, and this can be integrated in VL clinical guidelines. Conclusions An accurate diagnosis of TB can allow clinicians to assess its clinical impact and evaluate the impact of early TB diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]