Search

Background: Although it is recognized that people with peripheral neuropathy have an increased prevalence of chronic nerve entrapment, controversy still exists over their management. The present report details the evaluation, surgical approach, and outcome of a large cohort of people with diabetic and with idiopathic neuropathy., Methods: A retrospective review of 158 consecutive patients, 96 with diabetic and 62 with idiopathic neuropathy, was done to analyze the results of neurolysis of multiple sites of chronic nerve compression in the lower extremity. Of these patients, 50 had a contralateral limb decompressed for a total of 208 limbs included in the study. Outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS) for pain in the 109 patients who had pain level greater than 8.0, measurement of the cutaneous pressure threshold for sensibility, self-reported change in pain medication usage, and self-reported change in balance., Results: With a minimum follow-up of 1 year, 88% of patients with preoperative numbness reported improvement in sensation (P < 0.001). Of the 84 patients with impaired balance, 81% reported improvement in balance. Of those whose VAS was greater than 8, 83% reported an improvement in VAS (P < 0.001). There was a concomitant reduction in pain medication usage. There was no difference in outcomes between patients with diabetic versus idiopathic neuropathy in response to nerve decompression., Conclusions: Neurolysis of lower extremity chronic nerve compressions in patients with neuropathy and superimposed nerve compressions is an effective method for relieving pain, restoring sensation, and improving balance.

During the past 12 years, 6 studies reported restoration of sensation and relief of pain in the foot by decompression of the tibial nerve and its distal branches in diabetic neuropathy. Although a positive Tinel sign related to favorable outcomes in some of the reports, this relationship was not evaluated specifically. In this study, the presence of the Tinel sign, positive or negative, over the tibial nerve was recorded in 46 patients with diabetic neuropathy and in 40 patients with idiopathic neuropathy. Outcomes were dichotomized into either a good/excellent or failure/poor category. Postoperative data were analyzed at 1 year. In diabetic neuropathy, the presence of a positive Tinel sign had a sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 50%, and a positive predictive value of 88% in identifying patients who would have a good/excellent outcome. In idiopathic neuropathy, the presence of a positive Tinel sign had a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 56%, and a positive predictive value of 93% in identifying patients who would have a good/excellent outcome. It is concluded that a positive Tinel sign is a reliable indicator of successful outcome from decompression of the tibial nerve in patients with diabetes with symptomatic neuropathy, and in patients with symptomatic idiopathic neuropathy.

A series of 58 operations on 36 patients were performed for decompression of the posterior tibial nerve for the treatment of diabetic neuropathy. Preoperative symptoms included lack of sensation, pain, or both. Eleven of the 36 patients had neurotrophic ulcers, which were treated simultaneously. The operation was found to be effective for relief of pain in 24 of the 28 patients with that complaint (86 percent). Restoration of sensation was less consistent with improvement noted in 18 of the 36 patients (50 percent). The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 84 months (mean, 32 months) and five patients had some degree of recurrent symptoms. No patient has developed a new ulcer after nerve decompression. Wound complications were minimal (12 percent), even though ulcers were treated simultaneously. No patient required surgical treatment for the decompression incision, although one did require hospital admission for treatment of a wound infection. In general, the procedure seemed to be a worthwhile treatment, which should be considered ill selected diabetics with symptomatic neuropathy.

Diabetic neuropathy traditionally is considered progressive and irreversible and will result in lower extremity ulceration and amputation in a segment of the diabetic population, despite the best efforts to control serum glucose levels. Restoration of sensation to the diabetic may prevent these complications of neuropathy. The present study was designed to evaluate whether decompression of a peripheral nerve at a known site of anatomic narrowing can restore sensibility to that nerve in the diabetic. Twenty diabetic patients ( 14 type I, 6 type II, with a mean duration of diabetes of 14.8 years) had surgical decompression of a median nerve at the wrist and an ulnar nerve at the elbow, or a decompression of the posterior tibial nerve at the ankle (total of 31 nerves). A therapist, in a manner blind to the operative site, evaluated two-point discrimination in the pulp of the appropriate digit. The postoperative sensibility was compared with that of the nontreated, contralateral extremity. At a mean of 23.3 months, 69 percent of the lower-extremity nerves and 88 percent of the upper-extremity nerves (79 percent overall) had improvement in sensibility. In comparison, 32 percent of the control (not decompressed) contralateral nerves had measurable progression of neuropathy. The hypothesis that decompression of a peripheral nerve in the diabetic will improve sensibility was confirmed at the p < 0.001 level.