Search

Objectives: The study sought to evaluate the impact of diabetes mellitus on 3-year clinical outcome in patients undergoing drug-coated balloon (DCB) or drug-eluting stent (DES) treatment for de novo lesions., Background: For treatment of de novo coronary small vessel disease, DCBs are noninferior to DES., Methods: In this prespecified analysis of a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial, including 758 patients with de novo lesions in coronary vessels <3 mm who were randomized 1:1 to DCB or DES and followed over 3 years for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], and target vessel revascularization [TVR]), outcome was analyzed regarding the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus., Results: In nondiabetic patients (n = 506), rates of MACE (DCB 13.0% vs DES 11.5%; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-2.09; P = 0.43), cardiac death (2.8% vs 2.9%; HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.32-2.92; P = 0.96), nonfatal MI (5.1% vs 4.8%; HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.44-2.28; P = 0.99), and TVR (8.8% vs 6.1%; HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 0.83-3.25; P = 0.16) were similar. In diabetic patients (n = 252), rates of MACE (19.3% vs 22.2%; HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.45-1.48; P = 0.51), cardiac death (8.8% vs 5.9%; HR: 2.01; 95% CI: 0.76-5.31; P = 0.16), and nonfatal MI (7.1% vs 9.8%; HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.21-1.49; P = 0.24) were similar in DCB and DES. TVR was significantly lower with DCBs vs DES (9.1% vs 15.0%; HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.17-0.94; P = 0.036; P = 0.011 for interaction)., Conclusions: The rates of MACE are similar in DCBs and DES in de novo coronary lesions of diabetic and nondiabetic patients. In diabetic patients, need for TVR was significantly lower with DCB versus DES. (Basel Stent Kosten Effektivitäts Trial Drug Eluting Balloons vs Drug Eluting Stents in Small Vessel Interventions [BASKET-SMALL2]; NCT01574534)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Basel Cardiovascular Research Foundation, and B. Braun Medical AG. Dr Scheller is a shareholder of InnoRa GmbH and was named as co-inventor on patent applications submitted by Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany. Dr Ohlow has received proctoring honoraria and travel support from Biosensors; and has received research support from Terumo. Dr Mangner has received personal fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Biotronik, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Bayer, outside the submitted work. Dr Leibundgut has served on the medical user advisory board member for REVA Medical; and has had relationships with drug and device companies, including Terumo, Acrostak, Bionsensors, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Impuls Medical, and Orbus Neich. Dr Gilgen has received travel support from B. Braun. Dr Jeger has received lecture honoraria and travel support from B. Braun; and has received lecture honoraria from Cardionovum and Nipro. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, its effect on procedural and follow-up performance after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains controversial., Methods and Results: We performed an observational study of all consecutive patients treated with a transfemoral TAVR in a single-center cohort (n = 1818). All patients were stratified by diabetes status and gender. All-cause 3-year mortality was the primary endpoint. Male patients with DM were identified to have substantially increased 3-year mortality [125/314 (39.8%)] compared to males without DM [142/478 (29.7%), p < 0.01]. Male patients with DM had significantly higher 3-year mortality in comparison to female patients with (p < 0.01) or without DM (p < 0.01). There was no difference in 3-year mortality for female patients with [135/465 (29.0%)] and without DM [151/554 (27.3%); p = 0.70]. This increase in mortality in male DM patients was triggered by both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality. Furthermore, DM served as an independent predictor of 3-year mortality after TAVR selectively only in men. The interaction between male gender and diabetes mellitus was identified as an independent predictor of 3-year mortality [HR 1.88 (1.25; 2.82); p < 0.01]. DM did not affect 30-day mortality for the overall cohort and for males., Conclusion: Males with DM are a high-risk subgroup of patients after TAVR and require close medical attention including aggressive therapy of modifiable risk factors. Intensified diabetes management may improve long-term survival after TAVR.