Search

Aim: To conduct a post hoc subgroup analysis of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) from the RECAP study, who were treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) combination therapy, focusing only on those patients who had chronic kidney disease (CKD), to examine whether the composite renal outcome differed between those who received SGLT2 inhibitor treatment first and those who received a GLP-1RA first., Methods: We included 438 patients with CKD (GLP-1RA-first group, n = 223; SGLT2 inhibitor-first group, n = 215) from the 643 T2D patients in the RECAP study. The incidence of the composite renal outcome, defined as progression to macroalbuminuria and/or a ≥50% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), was analysed using a propensity score (PS)-matched model. Furthermore, we calculated the win ratio for these composite renal outcomes, which were weighted in the following order: (1) both a ≥50% decrease in eGFR and progression to macroalbuminuria; (2) a decrease in eGFR of ≥50% only; and (3) progression to macroalbuminuria only., Results: Using the PS-matched model, 132 patients from each group were paired. The incidence of renal composite outcomes did not differ between the two groups (GLP-1RA-first group, 10%; SGLT2 inhibitor-first group, 17%; odds ratio 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85 to 4.26; p = 0.12). The win ratio of the GLP-1RA-first group versus the SGLT2 inhibitor-first group was 1.83 (95% CI 1.71 to 1.95; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Although the renal composite outcome did not differ between the two groups, the win ratio of the GLP-1RA-first group versus the SGLT2 inhibitor-first group was significant. These results suggest that, in GLP-1RA and SGLT2 inhibitor combination therapy, the addition of an SGLT2 inhibitor to baseline GLP-1RA treatment may lead to more favourable renal outcomes., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aims: Combination therapy with sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors (SGLT2is) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP1Ras) is now of interest in clinical practice. The present study evaluated the effects of the preceding drug type on the renal outcome in clinical practice., Methods: We retrospectively extracted type 2 diabetes mellitus patients who had received both SGLT2i and GLP1Ra treatment for at least 1 year. A total of 331 patients in the GLP1Ra-preceding group and 312 patients in the SGLT2i-preceding group were ultimately analyzed. Either progression of the albuminuria status and/or a ≥30% decrease in the eGFR was set as the primary renal composite outcome. The analysis using propensity score with inverse probability weighting was performed for the outcome., Results: The incidences of the renal composite outcome in the SGLT2i- and GLP1Ra-preceding groups were 28% and 25%, respectively, with an odds ratio [95% confidence interval] of 1.14 [0.75, 1.73] ( p = .54). A logistic regression analysis showed that the mean arterial pressure (MAP) at baseline, the logarithmic value of the urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio at baseline, and the change in MAP were independent factors influencing the renal composite outcome., Conclusion: With combination therapy of SGLT2i and GLP1Ra, the preceding drug did not affect the renal outcome., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Metformin is a glucose-lowering agent that is used as a first-line therapy for type 2 diabetes (T2D). Based on its various pharmacologic actions, the renoprotective effects of metformin have been extensively studied. A series of experimental studies demonstrated that metformin attenuates diabetic kidney disease (DKD) by suppressing renal inflammation, oxidative stress and fibrosis. In clinical studies, metformin use has been shown to be associated with reduced rates of mortality, cardiovascular disease and progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in T2D patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, metformin should be administered with caution to patients with CKD because it may increase the risk of lactic acidosis. In this review article, we summarize our current understanding of the safety and efficacy of metformin for DKD.

Osteoporosis is a complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Blockade of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) improves osteoporosis, but might also improve glucose tolerance through reduction of hepatic insulin resistance. However, the effect of denosumab (a human monoclonal antibody of RANKL) upon glycemic and metabolic parameters is controversial. We revealed the effect of denosumab upon glycemic and metabolic parameters for 52 weeks. We evaluated 20 individuals diagnosed with both osteoporosis (male and female: postmenopausal) and T2DM. We measured glycemic and metabolic parameters before and 26/52 weeks after administration of denosumab (60 mg per 26 weeks) without changing any other medication each patient was taking. All patients completed the study without complications and the T-score (lumbar spine and femoral neck) improved significantly from baseline to 52 weeks after denosumab administration (P < .001, .001, respectively). None of the glycemic parameters changed significantly from baseline to 26 weeks after denosumab administration, but levels of glycated hemoglobin and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance improved significantly from baseline to 52 weeks after administration (P = .019, .008, respectively). The levels of liver enzymes did not change significantly from baseline to 26 weeks after denosumab administration, but levels of aspartate transaminase and alanine aminotransferase improved significantly from baseline to 52 weeks after administration (P = .014, .004, respectively). None of the markers of lipid metabolism and body mass index changed significantly from baseline to 26/52 weeks after denosumab administration. These data demonstrated that denosumab is useful for T2DM patients with osteoporosis for glycemic control via improvement of insulin resistance. Also, the effect of denosumab might be due to improvement of hepatic function.

Aims/introduction: Advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), which are a major cause of diabetic vascular complications, accumulate in various tissues under chronic hyperglycemic conditions, as well as with aging in patients with diabetes. The loss of muscle mass and strength, so-called sarcopenia and dynapenia, has recently been recognized as a diabetic complication. However, the influence of accumulated AGEs on muscle mass and strength remains unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the association of sarcopenia and dynapenia with accumulated AGEs in patients with type 2 diabetes., Materials and Methods: We recruited 166 patients with type 2 diabetes aged ≥30 years (mean age 63.2 ± 12.3 years; body mass index 26.3 ± 4.9 kg/m 2 ; glycated hemoglobin 7.1 ± 1.1%). Skin autofluorescence as a marker of AGEs, limb skeletal muscle mass index, grip strength, knee extension strength and gait speed were assessed., Results: Sarcopenia and dynapenia were observed in 7.2 and 13.9% of participants, respectively. Skin autofluorescence was significantly higher in patients with sarcopenia and dynapenia. Skin autofluorescence was the independent determinant for skeletal muscle mass index, grip strength, knee extension strength, sarcopenia and dynapenia., Conclusions: Accumulated AGEs could contribute to reduced muscle mass and strength, leading to sarcopenia and dynapenia in patients with type 2 diabetes., (© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), new antidiabetic agents, were reported to improve not only glycemic parameters but also metabolic and circulatory parameters. Whereas, several adverse events caused by SGLT2is were also reported. We aimed to investigate the changes of glycemic, metabolic, and circulatory parameters as well as safety with low-dose administration of two SGLT2is, canagliflozin and ipragliflozin, and also the difference between the two agents. 25 individuals with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were recruited and administered with low-dose SGLT2is, canagliflozin (n = 10, 50 mg/day) and ipragliflozin (n = 15, 25 mg/day). We examined glycemic, metabolic, and circulatory parameters at baseline and 24 weeks after administration. All patients completed the study without complications. Compared with baseline, levels of glycated hemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, and homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function improved significantly at 24 weeks after administration (p < 0.05). Levels of body weight, low-density lipoproteincholesterol, aspartate transaminase, γ-glutamyl transferase, and urinary excretion of albumin also improved significantly (p < 0.05). Moreover, systolic/diastolic blood pressure and levels of brain natriuretic peptide improved significantly (p < 0.05). The comparison of improvement ratio (values of improvement/values of basement) of each agent revealed that there was a significant difference between low-dose canagliflozin and low-dose ipragliflozin for brain natriuretic peptide (0.4404 vs. 0.0970, p = 0.0275). Hence, low-dose SGLT2is could be useful for patients of T2DM not only for hyperglycemia but also for metabolic and circulatory disorders without eliciting adverse events. In addition, with regard to the efficacy upon cardiovascular function, canagliflozin could be more suitable than ipragliflozin.

It has been reported that there is an intimate relationship between diabetes and bone metabolism including undercarboxylated osteocalcin (ucOC). In contrast, data on the relationship between ucOC and glucose metabolism are limited in type 2 diabetes. We recruited 50 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes, and examined the association with ucOC on the insulin secretion, evaluated by both glucagon loading test and meal tolerance test. UcOC was shown to correlate positively with the change in C-peptide response in the glucagon loading test and C-peptide response after eating a meal (P = 0.025, P = 0.047). Therefore, ucOC reflects the reserve capacity of β-cell function, such as the bolus insulin secretion ability in patients with type 2 diabetes., (© 2016 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)