Search

Aim: At the state of art it's unknown the correlation between diabetes and lower gastrointestinal disorders. Some studies show a significantly higher prevalence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with type I diabetes in particular complicated by autonomic neuropathy. No data exists about gastrointestinal methane production in patients with diabetes and autonomic diabetic neuropathy. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the correlation of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and gastrointestinal methane production with metabolic control and daily insulin requirements in patients with type 1 diabetes and. autonomic diabetic neuropathy., Methods: Thirty subjects with type 1 diabetes and autonomic diabetic neuropathy were underwent hydrogen and methane lactulose breath test (LBT) to evaluate the presence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (double peak of hydrogen) and methane production. The metabolic control was evaluated through the glycated hemoglobin and the daily insulin requirement (calculated as ratio between total insulin units in a day and body weight). Methane producers were treated with metronidazole (500 mg bid for 10 days) and perform a LBT 8 weeks after the end of therapy, Results: Eight over thirty patients (26.6%) met the diagnostic criteria for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. 11/30 patients (36%) were methane-producers (mean baseline value 16.37 ± 13.01 ppm; mean peak 26.62 ± 11.41 ppm); interestingly this subset of patients showed a worse glycemic control (mean HbA1c 8.16 ± 0.9% vs. 7.49 ± 0.8%, P<0.05). After metronidazole therapy 7/11 (63.3%) reduced CH4 production and they showed a mean HbA1c significantly lower than corresponding value before antibiotic therapy (7.63 ± 0.7% vs. 8.25 ± 0.8%)., Conclusion: Our study showed for the first time a possible role of CH4 production in metabolic control. In particular, the most interesting data is that an increased values of HbA1c seems to be related to a gut CH4 production as confirmed by its significant improvement after eradication therapy. We are not yet able to determine whether poor glycemic control is the cause or the consequence of the selection of methanogenic flora.

In western countries, diabetes mellitus, because of macrovascular and microvascular complications related to it, is still an important cause of death. Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) have a six-time higher risk of mortality than healthy patients. Since the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) established how an intensive therapy is necessary to prevent diabetes mellitus complications, many studies have been conducted to understand which method is able to reach an optimal metabolic control. In the past 30 years continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion established/introduced as a validate alternative to multiple daily injections. Several trials demonstrated that, when compared to MDI, CSII brings to a better metabolic control, in terms of a reduction of glycated hemoglobin and blood glucose variability, hypoglycemic episodes and improvement in quality of life. Because of their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, rapid-action insulin analogues are imposed as best insulin to be used in CSII. The rapid onset and the fast reached peak make them better mimic the way how pancreas secretes insulin. CSII by pump is not free from issues. Catheter occlusions, blockages, clogs can arrest insulin administration. The consequent higher levels of glycemic values, can easily bring to the onset of ketoacidosis, with an high risk for patients' life. Aspart is a rapid analogue obtained by aminoacidic substitution. It is as effective as lispro and glulisine in gaining a good metabolic control and even better in reducing glucose variability. Some studies tried to compare rapid analogues in terms of stability. Obtained data are controversial. An in vivo study evidenced higher stability or glulisine, while studies in vitro highlighted a higher safety of aspart. Nowadays it is not possible to assess which analogues is safer. When the infusion set is changed every 48 hours equivalent rates of occlusions have been observed.

Aims: Several studies have investigated the effects of metformin treatment in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). No study has hitherto examined its effects on endothelial function in these patients. In this study we sought to evaluate the effect of metformin on endothelial function in type 1 diabetic patients., Methods: Forty-two uncomplicated T1DM patients were randomized in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, 6-month trial to treatment with either metformin or placebo. Glycometabolic and clinical parameters as well as flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and nitrate-mediated dilation (NMD) of the right brachial artery were measured at baseline and at the end of the study. Glycaemic variability (GV, calculated from continuous glucose monitoring data) and a biomarker of oxidative stress [urinary 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α)] were also assessed., Results: Baseline data were similar in the two groups. Compared with placebo, metformin significantly reduced body weight [-2.27 kg (95% confidence interval: -3.99; -0.54); p = 0.012] whilst improved FMD [1.32% (0.30; 2.43); p = 0.013] and increased PGF2α [149 pg/mg creatinine (50; 248); p = 0.004]. Notably, the improvement of FMD did not correlate with the decrease of body weight (r(2)  < 1%). NMD, haemoglobin A1c, GV, daily insulin dose and other parameters did not significantly change after the treatment comparing the two groups., Conclusions: Our pilot trial showed that, in uncomplicated type 1 diabetic subjects, metformin improved FMD and increased PGF2α, a marker of oxidative stress, irrespective of its effects on glycaemic control and body weight. Randomized, blinded clinical trials are needed to evaluate the benefits and risks of metformin added to insulin in type 1 diabetes., (© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a pandemics that affects more than 170 million people worldwide, associated with increased mortality and morbidity due to coronary artery disease (CAD). In type 1 (T1) DM, the main pathogenic mechanism seems to be the destruction of pancreatic β -cells mediated by autoreactive T-cells resulting in chronic insulitis, while in type 2 (T2) DM primary insulin resistance, rather than defective insulin production due to β -cell destruction, seems to be the triggering alteration. In our study, we investigated the role of systemic inflammation and T-cell subsets in T1- and T2DM and the possible mechanisms underlying the increased cardiovascular risk associated with these diseases.

Objective: Type 1 diabetes is associated with increased platelet reactivity. We investigated whether α-lipoic acid (ALA) has any effect on platelet reactivity in these patients., Research Design and Methods: We randomly assigned 51 type 1 diabetic patients to ALA (600 mg once daily) or placebo for 5 weeks. Platelet reactivity was evaluated by the PFA-100 method and by measuring CD41 and CD62 platelet expression. C-reactive protein (CRP) and 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α serum levels also were measured., Results: Baseline variables were similar in the two groups. After treatment, closure time was longer (P = 0.006) and CD62P platelet expression was lower, both before (P = 0.002) and after (P = 0.009) ADP stimulation in the ALA group compared with the placebo group. CRP and 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α levels showed no differences between the two groups., Conclusions: Our data show that ALA reduces measures of platelet reactivity ex vivo in type 1 diabetic patients, independently of antioxidant or anti-inflammatory effects.

We describe the case of a 66-year-old man with chronic hepatitis C who developed type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and thyroid autoimmunity during Interferon alpha (INFalpha) therapy and then stiff-person syndrome (SPS). This is the first reported case in which SPS has appeared as complication of IFNalpha therapy., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aims: The effect of a balanced, carbohydrate-counting diet on glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetic subjects is unclear. Our aim was to determine its effect in a small, pilot trial., Methods: We randomized 256 Type 1 diabetic subjects to a Nutritional Education Programme (group A) or not (group B). Weight, body mass index, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), lipid profile, urate, creatinine, microalbuminuria and daily insulin requirements were measured at baseline and at the end of the study (9 months). During the study, the number of hypoglycaemic events (blood glucose<3.9 mmol/l) was also measured., Results: Compared with group B, group A showed: (i) a reduction in HbA1c (group A: 7.8+/-1.3-7.4+/-0.9%; group B: 7.5+/-0.8-7.5+/-1.1%; P<0.01); (ii) less hypoglycaemic events (4% vs. 7%; P<0.05); (iii) a reduction in dose of rapid insulin analogues (23.5+/-10.9 vs. 27.7+/-17.1 IU/24 h; P=0.03). No other between-group changes were observed., Conclusions: This study shows the importance of medical nutritional therapy on glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetic subjects.