Search

Objectives. Investigate the effect of using short bursts of moderate-intensity activity between meals to lower hyperglycaemia on glucose metrics. Design and Methods. Children and young people with type 1 diabetes (CYPD) attending continuous glucose monitoring education were taught to use moderate-intensity activity to lower high glucose levels (to <10.0 mmol/L using 10–15 minlowers ∼2.0 mmol/L) between meals. Retrospective cross-sectional data analysis of CYPD at a single tertiary centre between 2019 and 2022. Data were collected on demographics and glucose metrics (HbA1c, time in range (TIR, 3.9–10.0 mmol/L), time above range (TAR, >10.0 mmol/L), time below range (TBR, <3.9 mmol/L)). Minutes of activity usually performed to lower a glucose level of 14.0 mmol/L trending steady at 6 months grouped the CYPD into low (<5 min), mild (5–10 min), or moderate (11–20 min) activity groups. Results. 125 (n = 53, 40% male) CYPD with a mean (standard deviations) age of 12.3 (±3.7) years and diabetes duration of 7.0 ± 3.7 years were included. HbA1c improved from 58.5 (±8.6) mmol/mol at baseline to 54.9 (±7.2) mmol/mol at 6 months (p < 0.001). Low, mild, and moderate activity was reported by 30% (n = 37), 34% (n = 43), and 36% (n = 45), respectively. At 6 months, HbA1c (52.0 vs. 54.3 vs. 59.4 mmol/mol, p < 0.001), TIR (68.0% vs. 59.71 vs. 51.1%, p < 0.001) and TAR (29.9% vs. 38.3% vs. 45.3%, p < 0.001) were significantly different across the moderate, mild, and low activity groups, respectively. No association was found for TBR (2.16% vs. 2.32% vs. 2.58%, p = 0.408) across groups. Conclusion. Increasing the use of moderate-intensity activity to lower hyperglycaemia between meals is associated with improved glucose control without increasing hypoglycaemia for CYPD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Compare the clinical and cost‐effectiveness of an established face to face (F2F) structured education program to a new remote (VIRTUAL) program teaching dynamic glucose management (DynamicGM) to children and young people with type 1 diabetes (CYPD) using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). To ascertain the most effective DynamicGM strategies predicting time in range (TIR) (3.9–10.0 mmol/L) and incorporating these into a user‐friendly teaching aid. Design and methods: Effectiveness of the F2F and VIRTUAL programs were ascertained by comparing the mean change (Δ) from baseline to 6 months in HbA1c, TIR and severe hypoglycemia. Delivery cost for the two programs were evaluated. Factors predicting TIR in the combined cohort were determined and incorporated into a user‐friendly infographic. Results: First 50 graduates per group were evaluated. The mean difference in Δ HbA1c, Δ TIR and Δ episodes of severe hypoglycemia between VIRTUAL and F2F groups were 1.16 (p = 0.47), 0.76 (p = 0.78) and −0.06 (p = 0.61) respectively. Delivery cost per 50 CYPD for VIRTUAL and F2F were $5752 and $7020, respectively. The strongest predictors of TIR (n = 100) were short bursts of exercise (10–40 min) to lower hyperglycemia (p < 0.001), using trend arrow adjustment tools (p < 0.001) and adjusting pre‐meal bolus timing based on trend arrows (p < 0.01). These strategies were translated into a GAME (Stop highs), SET (Stay in target), MATCH (Prevent lows) mnemonic. Conclusion: Teaching DynamicGM VIRTUALLY is just as effective as F2F delivery and cost saving. Short bursts of exercise and using CGM trend arrows to adjust insulin dose and timing improves TIR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Create and evaluate the effectiveness of a structured education program in children and young people (CYP) with type 1 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Design and methods: Step 1: CGM devices were evaluated for predetermined criteria using a composite score. Step 2: The education program was developed following review of international structured education guidance, dynamic glucose management (DynamicGM) literature, award‐winning diabetes educators' websites, and CGM user feedback. Step 3: Program effectiveness was assessed at six months by change in time below range (TBR) (<3.9mmol/L), time in range (TIR) (3.9‐10.0mmol/L), time above range level 2 (TAR2) (>13.9mmol/L), severe hypoglycemia and HbA1c using a paired T‐test. A DynamicGM score was developed to assess proactive glucose management. Factors predicting TBR and TIR were assessed using regression analysis. Results: Dexcom G6 was chosen for integrated CGM (iCGM) status and highest composite score (29/30). Progressive DynamicGM strategies were taught through five sessions delivered over two months. Fifty CYP (23 male) with a mean (±SD) age and diabetes duration of 10.2 (±4.8) and 5.2 (±3.7) years respectively, who completed the education program were prospectively evaluated. Evaluation at six months showed a significant reduction in TBR (10.4% to 2.1%, p<.001), TAR2 (14.1% to 7.3%, p<.001), HbA1c [7.4 to 7.1% (57.7 to 53.8 mmol/mol), p<.001] and severe hypoglycemic episodes (10 to 1, p<.05); TIR increased (47.4% to 57.0%, p<.001). Number of Dexcom followers (p<.05) predicted reduction in TBR and DynamicGM score (p<.001) predicted increased TIR. Conclusion: Teaching DynamicGM strategies successfully improves TIR and reduces hypoglycemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]