Search

Objective: To investigate the relationship between urine specific gravity (USG) and the risk of arterial hypotension during general anaesthesia (GA) in healthy dogs premedicated with dexmedetomidine and methadone., Study Design: Prospective clinical cohort study., Animals: A total of 75 healthy client-owned dogs undergoing GA for elective tibial plateau levelling osteotomy., Methods: After placing an intravenous catheter, dogs were premedicated with dexmedetomidine (5 μg kg -1 ) and methadone (0.3 mg kg -1 ) intravenously. After induction of GA with alfaxalone to effect, the bladder was expressed and USG measured. An arterial catheter was placed, and residual blood was used to measure packed cell volume (PCV) and total protein (TP). GA was maintained with isoflurane vaporised in oxygen and a femoral and sciatic nerve block were performed. Arterial blood pressure < 60 mmHg was defined as hypotension and recorded by the anaesthetist. Treatment for hypotension was performed in a stepwise manner following a flow chart. Frequency of hypotension, treatment and response to treatment were recorded. Logistic regression modelling was used to assess the association between USG, TP and PCV and incidence of perioperative hypotension; p < 0.05., Results: Data from 14 dogs were excluded. Of the 61 dogs, 16 (26%) were hypotensive during GA, 15 dogs needed treatment of which 12 were responsive to a decrease in inhalant vaporiser setting. The logistic regression model was not statistically significant (p = 0.8). There was no significant association between USG (p = 0.6), TP (p = 0.4), PCV (p = 0.8) and arterial hypotension during GA., Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: In healthy dogs premedicated with dexmedetomidine and methadone and maintained under GA with isoflurane and a femoral and sciatic nerve block, there was no relationship between the specific gravity of urine collected after premedication and intraoperative arterial hypotension., (Copyright © 2023 Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists and American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The sedative and analgesic effects of continuous rate infusion (CRI) of dexmedetomidine (DEX) were investigated in Beagle dogs (n=8) using auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials (AEPs and SEPs) recorded before, during and after a CRI of saline or DEX (1.0, 3.0, 5.0 μg/kg bolus, followed by 1.0, 3.0, 5.0 μg/kg/h CRI, respectively). The results showed a significant reduction in AEP at doses of 1.0 μg/kg/h and above and a significant reduction of the SEP at doses of 3.0 and 5.0 μg/kg/h. Neither the AEP nor the SEP was further reduced at 5.0 μg/kg/h when compared to 3.0 μg/kg/h, although a slower return towards baseline values was observed at 5.0 μg/kg/h. The mean plasma levels (±SEM) of DEX during infusion were 0.533±0.053 ng/mL for the 1.0 μg/kg/h dose, 1.869±0.063 ng/mL for the 3.0 μg/kg/h dose and 4.017±0.385 for the 5.0 μg/kg/dose. It was concluded that in adult dogs, a CRI of DEX had a sedative and analgesic effect that could be described quantitatively using neurophysiological parameters. Sedation was achieved at lower plasma levels than required for analgesia, and DEX had a longer (but not larger) effect with infusion rates above 3.0 μg/kg/h., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

It was investigated whether continuous rate infusion of the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine can suppress memory formation by mechanisms other than reducing perception of sensory input in a fear-conditioning paradigm. Different groups of rats infused with either saline or dexmedetomidine (2.0, 4.0 or 10.0microg/kg bolus, followed by 2.0, 4.0 or 10.0microg/kg/h continuous rate infusion respectively), were subjected to a somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) fear-conditioning paradigm. This paradigm combined the pairing of an innoxious conditioned stimulus (CS) and a noxious unconditioned stimulus (US), of which the latter was used to generate the SEPs (training phase).The following day, the perception of the US during the training phase was assessed by presenting the CS only and subsequently scoring the resulting duration of freezing behaviour (testing phase). Freezing behaviour was reduced only in those groups which demonstrated reduced SEPs. Based on these findings, it is concluded that dexmedetomidine suppresses memory formation only at doses reducing central nervous system activity in response to sensory input., (Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To study, the analgesic and sedative effects of different constant rate infusions (CRI) of dexmedetomidine, in the rat, by measurement of specific electroencephalographic parameters. The recorded parameters were somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) and auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs), which have been shown to be related to analgesia and sedation respectively., Animals: Nine male Wistar rats (HsdCpb:Wu, Harlan Netherlands BV, body weight 300-350 g)., Methods: Somatosensory-evoked potentials were recorded from the primary somatosensory cortex and the vertex location (SI/Vx-SEPs). Auditory-evoked potentials were recorded from the primary auditory cortex and vertex location (AI/Vx-AEPs). Primary somatosensory cortex and vertex location recorded SEPs and AI/Vx-AEPs were recorded alternately, during CRI of dexmedetomidine (4.0, 10.0, 20.0 microg kg(-1) hour(-1)) and a control (saline)., Results: The primary somatosensory cortex-evoked potentials were not affected by the dexmedetomidine CRI, but the other three parameters were significantly affected; although the AI-SEP to a lesser extent than the Vx-SEP and Vx-AEP. A maximum effect on the Vx-AEP was reached at lower doses than on the Vx-SEP., Conclusions: Based on the present findings, it is suggested that CRI of dexmedetomidine provided profound sedation at low doses, whereas higher doses are needed to provide concurrent analgesia., Clinical Relevance: A constant rate infusion of dexmedetomidine can be a valuable adjunct in the provision of sedation and/or analgesia. However, analgesia cannot be produced without sedation, and sedation is not necessarily accompanied by comparative degrees of analgesia.

Abstract: It was investigated whether continuous rate infusion of the α2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine can suppress memory formation by mechanisms other than reducing perception of sensory input in a fear-conditioning paradigm. Different groups of rats infused with either saline or dexmedetomidine (2.0, 4.0 or 10.0µg/kg bolus, followed by 2.0, 4.0 or 10.0µg/kg/h continuous rate infusion respectively), were subjected to a somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) fear-conditioning paradigm. This paradigm combined the pairing of an innoxious conditioned stimulus (CS) and a noxious unconditioned stimulus (US), of which the latter was used to generate the SEPs (training phase).The following day, the perception of the US during the training phase was assessed by presenting the CS only and subsequently scoring the resulting duration of freezing behaviour (testing phase). Freezing behaviour was reduced only in those groups which demonstrated reduced SEPs. Based on these findings, it is concluded that dexmedetomidine suppresses memory formation only at doses reducing central nervous system activity in response to sensory input. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]