Search

Introduction: Coats disease is a sporadic, retinal vascular abnormality, causing blindness. Several interventional methods, including laser photocoagulation, have been proposed; however, the use of intravitreal dexamethasone in refractory Coats disease is not well described., Patient Concerns: A 38-year-old man presented with a painless reduction in visual acuity in his right eye, commencing 15 days prior to initial assessment., Diagnosis: Clinical manifestations and multimodal imaging indicated Coats disease., Interventions: Retinal laser photocoagulation was performed in the nonperfused areas, 15 months later, the exudative retinal detachment, and macular edema remained, the patient was then treated with an intravitreal slow-release dexamethasone implant., Outcomes: The exudative retinal detachment and macular edema had resolved, and the BCVA had also improved., Conclusion: Dexamethasone intravitreal implantation was effective in treating refractory Coats disease.

Purpose: To investigate changes in axial length after intravitreal dexamethasone implantation in patients with macular edema., Methods: We performed a prospective comparative study of 46 patients with unilateral macular edema, due to diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion, and non-infectious uveitis, who underwent dexamethasone implantation. The fellow eyes of the patients were considered the control group. The central macular thickness was measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, and axial length was measured by IOLMaster 700 optical coherence biometry. We compared axial length and central macular thickness values within the groups., Results: In the study group, the baseline central macular thickness was 460.19 ± 128.64 mm, significantly decreasing to 324.00 ± 79.84 mm after dexamethasone implantation (p=0.000). No significant change in central macular thickness measurements was seen in the control group (p=0.244). In the study group, the baseline axial length was 23.16 ± 0.68 mm, significantly increasing to 23.22 ± 0.65 mm after dexamethasone implantation (p=0.039). However, the control group exhibited no significant change in axial length (p=0.123)., Conclusions: In addition to significantly reducing central macular thickness measurements, intravitreal dexamethasone implantation also significantly changes optical biometry-based axial length measurements.

Background and Objectives: Ozurdex intravitreal injection is performed via a patented injection device. However, there is a common misconception among ophthalmologists regarding the relation between the speed of applicator button depression and the speed of pellet injection., Patients and Methods: Six dexamethasone intravitreal implants were injected into a calibrated ex vivo water bath. Three of the pellets were injected via rapid compression, whereas the other three implants were injected using a 3-second compression technique. The procedures were recorded using high-speed photography followed by calculation of pellet velocity and impact force., Results: The mean impact velocity and force of the pellet insertion is significantly higher in the fast injection group compared to the slow injection group., Conclusions: By depressing the Ozurdex implant injector during a 3-second time interval, the impact force of the implant pellet is reduced by about 95%. This new technique will theoretically reduce the risk of retinal injury and vitreous hemorrhage from Ozurdex injections. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019;50:e23-e25.]., (© 2019 Krambeer, Wannamaker, Tie, et al.)

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implants (DEX implant) in patients with treatment-resistant macular edema (ME) owing to branch and central retinal vein occlusion (BRVO/CRVO), and the influence of prior vitrectomy on this treatment. Methods: Multicenter retrospective chart review was performed on 40 CRVO and 32 BRVO eyes with persistent ME despite intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents and/or intravitreal triamcinolone, and/or laser therapy. Each patient received ≥1 dexamethasone 700 μg implant between March 2011 and December 2015. Thirteen patients underwent prior vitrectomy. Data were collected on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), time to relapse, and adverse events. Results: At the end of follow-up, BRVO eyes had a lesser CMT reduction from baseline compared to CRVO eyes (-122.50 ± 152.47 μm and -202.26 ± 194.09 μm, respectively). Neither BRVO nor CRVO eyes had a sustained BCVA benefit ( P  = 0.7041 and P  = 0.7027, respectively). Vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes overall had a sustained significant CMT reduction throughout the study with -192.46 ± 172.62 μm and -164.02 ± 180.36 μm, respectively, at final follow-up. Similar time to relapse of 24.4 ± 6.5 and 23.3 ± 13.5 weeks, respectively, was observed. By the end of follow-up, BCVA had only improved in vitrectomized eyes. However, multivariable regression analyses showed no significant association between vitrectomy status and CMT or BCVA change after the first and last injection. Cataract formation and ocular hypertension occurred in 25% and 17%, respectively. Conclusions: Multiple DEX implant are effective in reducing CMT in patients resistant to previous treatments and appear to be similarly effective in vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes.

Blinding retinal diseases become more epidemic as the population ages. These diseases, such as diabetic retinopathy and macular edema, are of chronic nature and require protracted drug presence at the disease site. A sustained intravitreal porous silicon delivery system with dexamethasone (pSiO 2 -COO-DEX) was evaluated in a new rabbit model of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) in a real treatment design. In contrast to the pretreatment design model, pSiO 2 -COO-DEX was intravitreally injected into the eyes with active inflammation. Subretinal injection of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Matrigel induced a late-onset vitreoretinal inflammation that gradually developed into PVR. This method mimics the human disease better than PVR induced by either intravitreal cell injection or trauma. The pSiO 2 -COO-DEX intervened eyes had minimal PVR, while balanced saline solution or free dexamethasone intervened eyes had significantly more PVR formation. In addition, adding VEGF to the Matrigel for subretinal injection induced greater inflammation and retinal neovascularization in comparison to only Matrigel injected under the medullary ray. Clinical and pathological examinations, including fundus fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography, confirmed these changes. In the current study, neither subretinal injection of Matrigel or subretinal injection of VEGF and Matrigel induced choroidal neovascularization. However, the current PVR model demonstrates a chronic course with moderate severity, which may be useful for drug screening studies.

Purpose: To study the suitability of injectable microspheres based on poly(ester amide) (PEA) or poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as potential vehicles for intravitreal drug delivery in rat eyes. Dexamethasone-loaded PEA microspheres (PEA + DEX) were also evaluated., Methods: Forty male Sprague Dawley rats were divided into four groups that received different intravitreally injected microspheres: PEA group (n = 12); PLGA group (n = 12); PEA + DEX group (n = 8); and control group (no injection, n = 8). Electroretinography (ERG), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (sdOCT) were performed at baseline, weeks 1 and 2, and months 1, 2, and 3 after intravitreal injection. Eyes were histologically examined using light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy at the end of the in vivo study., Results: There were no statistically significant changes in ERG among the groups. Abnormal FAF pattern and abnormal deposits in OCT were observed after injection but almost completely disappeared between week 2 and month 3 in all injected groups. GFAP staining showed that Müller glia cell activation was most pronounced in PLGA-injected eyes. Increased cell death was not observed by TUNEL staining at month 1. In electron microscopy at month 3, the remnants of microparticles were found in the retinal cells of all injected groups, and loss of plasma membrane was seen in the PLGA group., Conclusions: Although morphological changes such as mild glial activation and material remnants were observed histologically 1 month and 3 months after injection in all injected groups, minor cell damage was noted only in the PLGA group at 3 months after injection. No evidence of functional abnormality relative to untreated eyes could be detected by ERG 3 months after injection in all groups. Changes observed in in vivo imaging such as OCT and FAF disappeared after 3 months in almost all cases., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: to evaluate the effect of dexamethasone intravitreal implant on the functional state of the eye in macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion., Material and Methods: The study included two groups of patients: group 1 (control group) - 8 patients (16 eyes) without ocular pathology and group 2 (study group) - 8 patients (8 eyes) with macular edema on the background of newly diagnosed thrombosis of the central retinal vein. All the patients from the study group underwent insertion of an intravitreal dexamethasone implant - Ozurdex. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and retinal light sensitivity of the central visual field were followed up. The maximum follow-up period was 12 months., Results: In group 1 (controls), BCVA averaged 0.93±0.2 and retinal light sensitivity of the central visual field - 19.01±1.18 dB. In group 2, baseline BCVA and retinal light sensitivity were 0.08±0.02 and 4.23±0.2 dB, 1 month after Ozurdex implantation - 0.21±0.04 and 11.77±0.98 dB, at 12 months - 0.23±0.17 and 5.2±0.78 dB, respectively., Conclusion: Macular edema associated with central retinal vein thrombosis has a strong deteriorating effect on the functional state of the eye. The dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with postthrombotic macular edema contributes to functional improvement, including BCVA and light sensitivity of the central retina, over the first year. At that, different functional parameters show different dynamics after dexamethasone treatment. Light sensitivity values, in contrast to BCVA, change unevenly and significantly during the year. Intravitreal implantation of a dexamethasone implant in patients with postthrombotic macular edema is an effective symptomatic treatment of occlusive processes within the retinal venous system.

Background: Ozurdex is a 700 mcg dexamethasone intravitreal implant, approved for the management of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion, and other related pathoglogiesAnterior chamber dislocation of Ozurdex represents an uncommon complication of the intravitreal injection, which can be managed by repositioning the implant into the vitreous cavity. We describe the case of a successful repositioning of an Ozurdex implant by mobilization and subsequent balanced saline solution injection in the anterior chamber., Case Presentation: An 83-year-old white woman presented to our Emergency Unit complaining of pain and vision loss in herright eye lasting a week. Her anamnesis revealed a history of persistent cystoid macular edema after phacoemulsification with scleral-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation, recently treated with an intravitreal Ozurdex implant. She also took a long-distance flight 2 days after the injection. An anterior segment examination showed corneal edema and the rod implant adherent to corneal endothelium. To avoid corneal decompensation, we opted for a implant repositioning. Under topical anesthesia, a 30-gauge needle was introduced through a limbar incisionto mobilize the dislocated rod. Balanced saline solution was injected, with a successful repositioning of the implant into the vitreous cavity. Topical 5 % hypertonic saline solution and 0.2 % betamethasone associated with 0.5 % chloramphenicol drops were administered four times a day. To prevent redislocation of the Ozurdex implant, she was instructed to avoid prone position, any kind of physical effort, and not to undertake long-distance flights during the first postoperative week. One week after surgery, an anterior segment examination showed an improvement of corneal edema. Funduscopy showed that the Ozurdex implant was settled into the vitreous cavity., Conclusions: Anterior chamber dislocation of Ozurdex from the vitreous cavity is rare. In our patient, in addition to the posterior capsule tearing, the long-distance flight could have contributed to implant dislocation. Repositioning of the implant is necessary to avoid endothelial decompensation. It can be carried out by using saline balanced solution with the same efficacy as other surgical procedures reported in the literature. A possible disadvantage of this procedure could be implant migration.

Aim: To evaluate functional and morphometric parameters of the central retina in patients with postocclusive macular edema treated with dexamethasone intravitreal implant injection., Material and Methods: We examined 5 patients (5 eyes) with newly diagnosed central retinal vein occlusion complicated by macular edema, including 4 men and 1 woman aged 55.8±3.65 years (experimental group). All the patients received a single injection of dexamethasone intravitreal implant. The maximum follow-up period was 12 months. The control group consisted of 5 presbiopic patients (10 eyes) aged 59.14±3.14 years., Results: One month after injection, the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal light sensitivity improved (from 0.09±0.03 to 0.19±0.05 and from 3.18±0.19 to 11.07±0.97 dB, correspondingly), while foveolar thickness decreased from 425.36±57.87 to 273.75±36.65 µm. One year after the treatment, BCVA remained high and averaged 0.21±0.14. The total light sensitivity also remained higher than that at baseline, however, decreased down to 4.8±0.76 dB. Optical coherence tomography showed some flatness of the fovea. Foveolar thickness appeared 1.5 times higher than that in the control group and 1.2 times higher than that at the 1-month follow-up after dexamethasone intravitreal implant injection. Over the whole follow-up period, IOP has never significantly exceeded the baseline, optical media remained clear., Conclusion: 1. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant has been shown effective in resolving postocclusive macular edema, improving visual functions, and increasing central retinal light sensitivity within the first month after injection. 2. Positive changes in morphometric parameters of the central retina induced by the injection involve inner segments of photoreceptors as well as the outer nuclear, outer plexiform and inner nuclear layers. The morphofunctional effect persists for no less than 12 months after injection. 3. Over the 1-year follow-up period, there has been no negative influence of the implant on either intraocular pressure level, or lens transparency.

Objective: To present the influence of dexamethasone intravitreal implant due to macular edema in non-infectious uveitis in the fellow eye., Patients and Methods: A 25-year-old patient with a long history of juvenile arthritis with concomitant recurrent bilateral uveitis, complicated with increases of intraocular pressure and macular edema was treated with a single intravitreal dexamethasone implant into the eye with lower visual acuity., Results: During a 36-month follow-up, the patient's bilateral visual acuity improved. The retinal thickness in both maculae decreased., Conclusions: Treating macular edema in the course of recurrent uveitis accompanying a systemic disease with dexamethasone depot in vitreous may play a beneficial role also in the fellow eye, when affected. This therapeutic effect in the fellow eye may suggest that the medication can penetrate into the circulatory system and reach such other organs as the fellow eye.

Delivery of therapeutic agents to posterior segment of the eyes is challenging due to the anatomy and physiology of ocular barriers and thus long-acting implantable formulations are much desired. In this study, a thermogelling system composed of two poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid)-poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA-PEG-PLGA) triblock copolymers was developed as an injectable matrix for intravitreal drug delivery. The thermogel was prepared by mixing a sol and a precipitate of PLGA-PEG-PLGA triblock copolymers with different block ratios, among which a hydrophobic glucocorticoid, dexamethasone (DEX), was incorporated. The DEX-loaded thermogel was a low-viscous liquid at low temperature and formed a non-flowing gel at body temperature. The in vitro release rate of DEX from the thermogel could be conveniently modulated by varying the mixing ratio of the two copolymers. The long-lasting intraocular residence of the thermogel was demonstrated by intravitreal injection of a fluorescence-labeled thermogel to rabbits. Compared with a DEX suspension, the intravitreal retention time of DEX increased from a dozen hours to over 1week when being loaded in the thermogel. Additionally, intravitreal administration of the thermogel did not impair the morphology of retina and cornea. This study reveals that the injectable PLGA-PEG-PLGA thermogel is a biocompatible carrier for sustained delivery of bioactive agents into the eyes, and provides an alternative approach for treatment of posterior segment diseases., (Copyright © 2015 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To describe the outcomes of concurrent Ozurdex implantation during anterior segment surgery in patients with chronic recurrent uveitis., Methods: Retrospective chart review. Data recorded from preoperative and 1-, 3-, and 6-month postoperative visits included visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), medications, and clinical examination findings of inflammation., Results: Twelve patients (12 eyes) with chronic, recurrent noninfectious uveitis undergoing cataract extraction (n=9) or intraocular lens (IOL) explantation (n=3) were included. Mean duration of follow-up after Ozurdex implantation was 12.9 months. There was a significant reduction (n=10, P=0.02) in the average number of inflammation recurrences 6 months before surgery compared to 6 months after surgery with Ozurdex in affected eyes. IOP remained stable in the postoperative period. One patient undergoing anterior chamber IOL (ACIOL) explantation experienced migration of Ozurdex into the anterior chamber resulting in corneal edema that resolved after 1 month., Conclusions: Ozurdex safely and effectively controlled postoperative inflammation in eyes with chronic recurrent uveitis when concurrently implanted during anterior segment surgery in our patients. Caution should be exercised in cases of IOL explantation, as Ozurdex use is now contraindicated in eyes with posterior capsule rupture and ACIOLs.

The clinical efficacy of one or two intravitreal injections of a continued deliverance dexamethasone 700 μg implant in ten patients with persistent macular edema following uncomplicated phacoemulsification was evaluated. Complete ophthalmological examination and spectral domain optical coherence tomography were carried out. Follow-up was at day 7 and months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12. At baseline mean best corrected visual acuity was 62 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Chart letters, which showed statistically significant improvement at each follow-up, except at month 6, to reach 79 letters at month 12 (P = 0.018). Prior to treatment mean central foveal thickness was 622 μm, which showed statistically significant improvement at each follow-up to reach a mean value of 282 μm (P = 0.012) at month 12. Five patients received a second dexamethasone implant at month 7. Two patients were excluded from the study at months 4 and 8. Intraocular pressure remained stable during the study period with the exception of mild increase in two patients requiring topical therapy. In conclusion there was statistically significant improvement of best corrected visual acuity and mean central foveal thickness with one or two intravitreal dexamethasone implants over 12 months.

Two cases of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex) use are reported. The drug promotes resolution of macular edema and ensures a long-term improvement of visual acuity. The latter may depend on such factors as the duration of the disease and localization of the occlusion. Application of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant provides new opportunities for the treatment of retinal vein occlusions.

Retinitis pigmentosa denotes a heterogeneous group of rare genetic diseases in which both rods and cones eye are damaged. It is a disease of poor prognosis. We describe the case of a 22 years old woman successfully treated with intravitreal implant of dexamentasone (OZURDEX®, Allergan, USA) for the treatment of macular edema due to retinitis pigmentosa.

The purpose of this research was to investigate the possibility of dexamethasone (DEX)-loaded PLGA-TPGS nanoparticles (NPs) in rabbits after intravitreal administration for the treatment of posterior segment diseases. The DEX-loaded PLGA-TPGS NPs were fabricated and characterized in terms of surface morphology, particle size and size distribution, entrapment efficiency, and in vitro drug release. The animals were classified randomly into two groups: experimental group with thirty rabbits, and control group with eighteen rabbits. Rabbits in the experimental group received intravitreal injections of 0.1 mL of DEX-loaded PLGA-TPGS NPs suspension and the control rabbits received intravitreal injection of 0.1 mL DEX (20 g/L in saline). The DEX concentrations in plasma and the ocular tissues such as the cornea, aqueous humor, lens, iris, vitreous humor, and chorioretina were determined by HPLC. The DEX-loaded PLGA-TPGS nanoparticle suspension were transparent and maintained a sustained release of DEX for about 45 days in vitreous and provided relatively constant DEX levels for more than 30 days with a mean concentration of 3.93 mg/L. Based on the area-under-the-curve (AUC), the bioavailability of DEX in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group administrated with regular DEX. These results suggest that intravitreal administration of DEX-loaded PL.3A-TPGS NPs leads to a sustained release of DEX with a high bioavailability, providing a basis for a novel approach to treat posterior segment diseases.