Search

Background: The purpose of this scoping review was to examine the nature and quality of research regarding paediatric supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures in low and lower middle-income countries (LICs)., Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and African Journals Online on January 9, 2018, for studies of SCH fractures in LICs. Studies were categorized by geographic region, Gartland classification of included patients, and study design. We evaluated each study's methodology and conclusions., Results: Out of 1805 results, we analyzed 105 studies, most of which included type 3 fractures only (66%). Many were conducted in South Asia (58%) and assessed treatment outcomes (78%). Most of the studies had level IV evidence (67%). Common limitations of research were small sample size (12%) and inadequate follow-up (6%). Epidemiological studies concluded that SCH fractures are more common among male children, are usually secondary to falls, and rarely present with nerve injuries. Most therapeutic studies reported outcomes of surgery (91%). Thirteen studies concluded that all-lateral versus cross-pinning techniques have similar outcomes. Seven studies reported preference for closed reduction over open reduction, when intra-operative fluoroscopy was available. Most common outcome measures were Flynn criteria (77%) and range of motion (53%). None of the papers looked at treatment costs., Conclusions: Our data show a predominance of small level IV studies from LICs, with few studies of higher level of evidence. Many studies examined controversies with surgical technique, similar to studies performed in high-income countries. Few studies examined non-operative treatment, which is commonly the predominant treatment available for patients in LICs. Further investigation of common treatment modalities and outcomes for SCH fractures in LICs is needed.

Background: The burden of injuries is high in low-income and middle-income countries such as Malawi, where access to musculoskeletal trauma care is limited. Delayed treatment can worsen trauma-related disability. Understanding risk factors for delayed hospital presentation will assist in guiding trauma system development., Methods: We examined the records of 1,380 pediatric and adult patients with fractures who presented to the orthopaedic clinics of 2 urban referral hospitals and 2 rural district hospitals in Malawi. We used multivariate Poisson regression to evaluate the association between presentation to a hospital ≥2 days after the injury (delayed presentation) and 11 covariates: age, sex, education level, occupation, season of injury, day of injury, injury mechanism, injury type or extremity of injury, referral status, hospital of presentation, and estimated travel time., Results: Twenty-eight percent of pediatric patients and 34% of adult patients presented late. In the pediatric cohort, fall (relative risk [RR], 1.40 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02 to 1.93]), sports injuries (RR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.09 to 2.49]), tibial or fibular injuries (RR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.77]), injury over the weekend (RR, 2.30 [95% CI, 1.88 to 2.80]), estimated travel time of ≥20 minutes (RR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.16 to 1.81]), referral from another facility (RR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.05 to 2.02]), and presentation to Kamuzu Central Hospital, Mangochi District Hospital, or Nkhata Bay District Hospital (RR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.07 to 1.69]) independently increased the risk of delayed presentation. In the adult cohort, fall (RR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.38 to 2.46]), injury over the weekend (RR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.38 to 2.36]), estimated travel time ≥20 minutes (RR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.03 to 1.80]), and presentation to Kamuzu Central Hospital (RR, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.30 to 2.33]) independently increased the risk of delayed presentation., Conclusions: Delayed presentation to the hospital after a musculoskeletal injury is common in Malawi. Interventions are needed to improve access to musculoskeletal trauma care, especially for pediatric patients with tibial or fibular injuries, all patients after falls, patients injured over the weekend, and patients living far from health facilities.

Objectives: Injury is a significant source of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and often disproportionately affects younger, more productive members of society. While many have made the case for improved injury prevention and trauma care, health system development in low- and middle-income countries is often limited by resources. This study aims to determine the economic benefit of improved injury prevention and trauma care in low- and middle-income countries., Methods: This study uses existing data on injury mortality worldwide from the 2010 Global Burden of Disease Study to estimate the number of lives that could be saved if injury mortality rates in low- and middle-income countries could be reduced to rates in high-income countries. Using economic modeling--through the human capital approach and the value of a statistical life approach--the study then demonstrates the associated economic benefit of these lives saved., Results: 88 percent of injury-related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. If injury mortality rates in low- and middle-income countries were reduced to rates in high-income countries, 2,117,500 lives could be saved per year. This would result in between 49 million and 52 million disability adjusted life years averted per year, with discounting and age weighting. Using the human capital approach, the associated economic benefit of reducing mortality rates ranges from $245 to $261 billion with discounting and age weighting. Using the value of a statistical life approach, the benefit is between 758 and 786 billion dollars per year., Conclusions: Reducing injury mortality in low- and middle-income countries could save over 2 million lives per year and provide significant economic benefit globally. Further investments in trauma care and injury prevention are needed.

Abstract: Globally, the burden of musculoskeletal conditions continues to rise, disproportionately affecting low and middle-income countries (LMICs). The ability to meet these orthopaedic surgical care demands remains a challenge. To help address these issues, many orthopaedic surgeons seek opportunities to provide humanitarian assistance to the populations in need. While many global orthopaedic initiatives are well-intentioned and can offer short-term benefits to the local communities, it is essential to emphasize training and the integration of local surgeon-leaders. The commitment to developing educational and investigative capacity, as well as fostering sustainable, mutually beneficial partnerships in low-resource settings, is critical. To this end, global health organizations, such as the Consortium of Orthopaedic Academic Traumatologists (COACT), work to promote and ensure the lasting sustainability of musculoskeletal trauma care worldwide. This article describes global orthopaedic efforts that can effectively address musculoskeletal care through an examination of 5 domains: clinical care, clinical research, surgical education, disaster response, and advocacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]