Search

Purpose: To better understand opportunities and barriers to implementation and adoption, this mixed‐methods study qualitatively examined attitudes toward telecardiology services among veterans who use in‐person (IP) outpatient cardiology service versus those using telecardiology (TC) outpatient services. Methods: Free‐text responses were collected from N = 179 veterans enrolled in Veteran Health Administration (VHA) IP or TC services in 3 rural‐serving, outpatient telehealth clinics and 1 large, metropolitan outpatient center. Mixed‐method analyses of responses included thematic analysis, followed by comparison of code categories and themes between IP and TC groups. Findings: Fifteen thematic coding categories were identified, which comprised 4 valence categories (favorable or unfavorable attitudes toward TC and IP), as well as themes pertaining to obstacles and opportunities for TC implementation. Overall, veterans enrolled in TC held more favorable attitudes toward TC than those enrolled in IP. Veteran responses included structural concerns (eg, time demands, access, and travel), as well as humanistic qualities (rapport, competence, and face‐to‐face contact). Differences were observed between the responses of veterans who reported dwelling in urban, suburban, and rural communities, with rural‐identifying veterans generally holding more favorable attitudes toward TC than suburban‐identifying veterans. Conclusions: TC users had overwhelmingly positive perceptions of TC. Conversely, unfavorable attitudes from IP patients toward TC did not appear to be borne out in the responses of TC users. On the contrary, TC users' responses may indicate opportunities for allaying the concerns of TC‐naïve veterans. This suggests promise for developing tailored education to dispel barriers for TC service implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether a brief educational video administered online improved nurse practitioners' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding skin cancer and skin cancer prevention counseling. Participants completed an online test assessing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors, before and after viewing an online video. Thirty Arizona nurse practitioners completed the pilot study. There were statistically significant increases from the pretest to the posttest for all main variables. This pilot study found that the online intervention was highly effective for improving nurse practitioners' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding skin cancer and skin cancer prevention counseling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Skin cancer is the most common cancer worldwide and one of the most preventable. Skin cancer incidence continues to rise among adolescents. The inconsistent practice guidelines for skin cancer prevention create challenges for counseling. The purposes of this study were to investigate skin cancer knowledge, attitudes, and primary prevention counseling practices by Arizona nurse practitioners caring for adolescents on an outpatient basis and to determine congruency of counseling with evidence-based guidelines. Participants completed a quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional study using an online survey. The main variables were knowledge of skin cancer, skin cancer prevention, attitudes regarding counseling, current practice guideline use, and recommendations. Of the 67 participants who responded to the survey, 51 were eligible, and 44 completed the survey. Participant knowledge regarding skin cancer was moderate to low, and less was known about skin cancer in adolescents. Despite positive attitudes toward skin cancer prevention, participants reported low rates of counseling in practice, similar to previous interdisciplinary research. Reported recommendations used in practice were not reflective of any one particular guideline. Future research should explore barriers to incorporating primary prevention counseling practices and aim to educate nurse practitioners on skin cancer prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]