Search

Objective: To determine oncological and functional outcomes in patients with T3 and T4 laryngeal carcinoma, in which choice of treatment was based on expected laryngeal function and not T classification. Methods: Oncological outcomes (disease-specific survival and overall survival) as well as functional outcomes (larynx preservation and functional larynx preservation) were analysed. Results: In 130 T3 and 59 T4 patients, there was no difference in disease-specific survival or overall survival rates after radiotherapy (RT) (107 patients), chemoradiotherapy (36 patients) and total laryngectomy (46 patients). The five-year disease-specific survival rates were 83 per cent after RT, 78 per cent after chemoradiotherapy and 69 per cent after total laryngectomy, whereas overall survival rates were 62, 54 and 60 per cent, respectively. Five-year larynx preservation and functional larynx preservation rates were comparable for RT (79 and 66 per cent, respectively) and chemoradiotherapy (86 and 62 per cent, respectively). Conclusion: There is no difference in oncological outcome after (chemo)radiotherapy or total laryngectomy in T3 and T4 laryngeal carcinoma patients whose choice of treatment was based on expected laryngeal function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are rapidly developing tumours, and substantial delay in treatment initiation is associated with decreased overall survival. The effect of delay on health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of delay on QOL and overall survival. Methods: Patients with mucosal HNSCC were prospectively included. HRQOL and 2‐year overall survival were analysed using linear mixed‐model analyses and cox regression, respectively. Delay was defined as care pathway interval (CPI) of ≥30 days between first consultation and treatment initiation. Results: Median CPI was 39 days for the 173 patients included. A trend towards higher HRQOL‐scores (indicating better HRQOL) during 2‐year follow‐up for patients with delay in treatment initiation was visible in the adjusted models (HRQOL summary score—β: 2.62, 95% CI: 0.57–4.67, p = 0.012). Factors associated with decreased overall survival were moderate comorbidities (HR: 5.10, 95% CI: 1.65–15.76, p = 0.005) and stage‐IV tumours (HR: 12.37, 95% CI: 2.81–54.39, p = 0.001). Delay was not associated with worse overall survival. Conclusion: Timely treatment initiation is challenging, especially for patients with advanced tumours and initial radiotherapy treatment. Encountering delay in treatment initiation did not result in clinically relevant differences in HRQOL‐scores or decreased overall survival during 2‐year follow‐up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are relatively fast‐growing tumours, and delay of treatment is associated with tumour progression and adverse outcomes. The aim of this study is to identify determinants of delay in a head and neck oncology centre. Methods: This cohort study with prospectively collected data investigated associations between patient (including geriatric assessment at first consultation), tumour and treatment characteristics and treatment delay. Two quality indicator intervals assessing value‐based healthcare were studied: care pathway interval (CPI, interval between first visit in an HNOC and treatment initiation) and time‐to‐treatment initiation (TTI, interval between histopathological confirmation of HNSCC and treatment initiation), using regression analyses. Results: Stage‐IV tumours and initial radiotherapy were independent predictors of delay in CPI. Initial radiotherapy was associated with delay in TTI. Overall, 37% of the patients started treatment within 30 days after first consultation (67% in case of initial surgical treatment and 11.5% if treated with (chemo)radiation, p < 0.001). Geriatric assessment outcomes were not associated with delay. Indicators for delay in initial surgery patients were stage‐IV tumours (CPI). Conclusion: The majority of HNSCC patients encounter delay in treatment initiation, specifically in patients with advanced‐stage tumours or when radiotherapy is indicated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]