Search

Background: The dermoscopic features of congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) have recently been described, and some structures have been proposed as distinctive of these moles. Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the agreement between observers, i.e. the reproducibility, in the identification of these features. Method: Fifty-two CMN, randomly selected from 127 male subjects carrying at least 1 CMN, were examined by a 1st medium-experienced observer. The image recording was performed according to the dermoscopic patterns of the Consensus Net Meeting on Dermoscopy and to the features proposed for CMN by Seidenari et al. The presence/absence of these features was recorded in a specifically developed patient’s card, and the most typical dermoscopic features of the lesions were also photographed and observed again in this form by the same investigator and by a 2nd basic-experienced observer. The reproducibility of the dermoscopic features assessed directly and on photographs by the 1st observer (intraobserver agreement) and the agreement between the 1st and the 2nd observers judging nevi on photographs (interobserver agreement) were estimated by Cohen’s kappa statistics. Results: Intraobserver agreement was highly satisfactory for all the dermoscopic features, with the exception of focal thickening of network lines and follicles (satisfactory), and hyperpigmented areas and target vessels (fairly satisfactory), which were more frequently identified on Dermaphot pictures. Interobserver agreementwas highly satisfactory for network, globules/dots, blotches, focal hypopigmentation, skin furrow hypopigmentation and follicles; it was satisfactoryfor perifollicular hypopigmentation, vessels and target vessels, and barely satisfactory for focal thickening of network lines, target globules and hyperpigmented areas; finally, it was fairly satisfactory for target network. Conclusion: The identification of dermoscopic features of CMN seems to show a good reproducibility, with a satisfactory intra- and interobserver agreement. Other studies involving a higher number of experienced and less experienced observers are requested to confirm these results. Copyright © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dermoscopic features of congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) have been mostly assessed by high-resolution videodermoscopy. However, optical dermoscopy with the 10-fold magnification is largely available. In some instances, the differential diagnosis between large CMN and Becker nevus (BN) may be difficult. Objective: The aims of this work were: (1) to assess by dermoscopy with the 10-fold magnification the morphological features which have been previously suggested as useful for the identification of CMN in high-resolution videodermoscopy; (2) to search and point out the dermoscopic features of BN; (3) to explore dermoscopic differences between CMN and BN. Methods: The subjects were observed among about 23,000 consecutive young men assessed at the Draft Council’s Medical Unit of the Italian Navy in Taranto for compulsory recruitment and referred to the Department of Dermatology of the Italian Navy Hospital for dermatological examination. Lesions were examined by the same observer using a dermatoscope with a 10-fold magnification, and both the dermoscopic criteria stated by the international Consensus Net Meeting on Dermoscopy and dermoscopic features previously suggested as useful for the identification of CMN by videodermoscopy were recorded in a predisposed patient’s card. Results: There were 127 male subjects, median age 19 years, with 127 CMN, measuring ≥1.5 to ≤19.9 cm in 78% and ≥20 cm in 22% of cases, and 64 male subjects, median age 19 years, with 64 BN. In the sample of medium-sized and large CMN, dermoscopic features previously identified as characteristic of congenital lesions (i.e. target network, focal thickening of network lines, target globules, skin furrow hypopigmentation, focal hypopigmentation, hair follicles, perifollicular hypopigmentation, vessels and target vessels) were observed in sufficiently high rates. In the BN group, network, focal hypopigmentation, skin furrow hypopigmentation, hair follicles, perifollicular hypopigmentation and vessels were the main dermoscopic features. Focal thickening of network lines, globules, target globules, homogeneous diffuse pigmentation, hyperpigmented areas, blotches and target vessels were more frequently observed in CMN than in BN. Conclusions: (1) The same dermoscopic features observed in small and medium-sized CMN by videodermoscopy with high magnifications are also detectable in medium-sized and large CMN, employing the dermoscopy with the 10-fold magnification. (2) Network, focal, skin furrow and perifollicular hypopigmentation, hair follicles and vessels could be considered as peculiar dermoscopic features of BN. (3) Major differences in the frequency of dermoscopic characteristics were detected between CMN and BN, and dermoscopy seems to provide some diagnostic aid in differentiating CMN from BN in equivocal cases. Copyright © 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]