Search

Purpose: Currently, there are several oxaliplatin combination regimens for first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In this study, we compared the survival outcomes of mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab in combination with either modified 5-FU/FA/oxaliplatin (mFOL- FOX6) or capecitabine/oxaliplatin (XELOX)., Methods: We designed a two-arm retrospective study of mCRC patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum who were treated with bevacizumab and either mFOLFOX6 or XELOX and who had complete clinical and treatment data. We analysed their therapeutic responses, adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), and then determined whether there were any statistically significant differences., Results: A total of 131 patients (85 male; 65% and 46 female; 35%) were evaluated. Fifty-seven patients (43.5%) were treated with bevacizumab and mFOLFOX6 and 74 (56.5%) with bevacizumab and XELOX. The median PFS was 9.1 months (95% CI, 4.9-13.1) and 10 months (95% CI, 4.2-15.9) in the mFOLFOX6 and XELOX arms, respectively (p=0.610). The median OS was 29 months (95% CI, 21.6- 34.3) and 27.5 months (95% CI 20-38) in the mFOLFOX6 and XELOX arms (p=0.812), respectively. The most common reason for treatment withdrawal was disease progression (102 patients; 91%) and the most common grade 3-4 toxicity was neuropathy (≤14%)., Conclusion: Our results show that XELOX is a safe and effective alternative to mFOLFOX6 when combined with bevacizumab as first-line treatment for mCRC patients.

Purpose: Erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume (MCV) increase has been described in patients treated with capecitabine. In this study, we sought to evaluate the potential association of the erythrocyte MCV increase with tumor response and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with capecitabine., Methods: A retrospective review of 131 patients with mCRC who were treated with capecitabine for at least 3 months at the Izmir Training and Research Hospital was undertaken. Complete blood count (CBC) including red blood cell indices were recorded at baseline and after 9 weeks from capecitabine treatment., Results: The mean patient age was 57.9 years (range 28- 82). In patients treated with capecitabine, MCV increased significantly at 9 weeks compared with baseline (p=0.000). Median ΔMCV [(post-treatment MCV values) - (baseline MCV values)] level was 9.3 fL. Patients were grouped according to ΔMCV into two groups (> 9.3 or ≥ 9.3) in order to carry out survival analysis and correlation with tumor response. ΔMCV was >9.3 in 65 patients and ≤9.3 in 66 patients. Fifty-six of the 65 patients with ΔMCV levels >9.3 and 37 of the 66 patients with ΔMCV levels ≤9.3 had a clinical benefit (complete response + partial response + stable disease) from capecitabine treatment (p=0.000). The difference between progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the patients who had ΔMCV>9.3 and those who had ≤9.3 was statistically significant (9.48 and 6.94 months, p=0.001 respectively; and 17.5 and 13.6 months respectively, p=0.018). Univariate analysis suggested that a favorable prognosis for OS and PFS was associated with MCV increase (p=0.000). In multivariate analysis, MCV increase was independently associated with favorable survival outcomes., Conclusions: Erythrocyte MCV increase may be used as a predictive marker for treatment response, PFS and OS in patients with mCRC treated with capecitabine.

Background: The role of second-line therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer is not clear. In this study, we aimed to explore the second-line efficiency of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who have received gemcitabine-based first-line therapy., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 47 patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine-based first-line regimens. Treatment consisted of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily with a 3 week interval, until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression., Results: Median number of cycles was 4 (range, 2-10). The overall disease control rate was 38.3%. The median overall survival and progression-free survival from the start of second-line therapy were 23 weeks (95%CI: 16.6-29.5 weeks) and 12 weeks (95%CI: 9.8-14.4 weeks), respectively. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were nausea, vomiting and hematologic side effects., Conclusions: Our result suggests that the combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin was tolerated with manageable toxicity and showed encouraging activity as second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients with ECOG performance status 0-2.

The administration of antineoplastic agents are associated with various vascular events. A case of acute bilateral renal infarction in a patient with non-small cell lung carcinoma during chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine is reported. The patient was misdiagnosed as having renal colic. To our knowledge, bilateral renal infarction following cisplatin and gemcitabine has not been reported previously. Renal infarction should be considered in the differential diagnosis of flank pain in a patient treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin.