Search

Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of intraoral scanners by comparing the trueness and precision of several types of scanners in measuring the distance between the ball abutments on pairs of multiple implants. Methods Seven implants were placed on a fully edentulous upper jaw model. After ball abutments were attached to the implants on the master model, the three-dimensional (3D) shape of the model was evaluated using a computer numerical control 3D coordinate-measuring machine. Subsequently, the 3D shape-related data of the model were obtained using two types of intraoral scanners (3M True Definition Scanner [TDS] and 3Shape Trios3 [TR3]) and two types of laboratory scanners (KaVo ARCTICA Auto Scan [KA] and Identica Hybrid [IH]). Using the obtained 3D shape-related data, the trueness and precision in measuring the distance between the balls within seven pairs of ball abutments were compared among the scanners using 3D analysis software. Results Intraoral scanners produced significantly greater errors in trueness and precision than laboratory scanners in measuring the distances between the ball abutments in all the dental regions. Between the intraoral scanners, powder-requiring TDS produced significantly lower errors at inflection points than powder-free TR3. Conclusions These results indicate that an optical impression technique using an intraoral scanner is suitable for dental implant treatment in patients with a few missing teeth.

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to examine morphological changes in the superstructure of implants in relation to the degree of attrition of the implant superstructure and its antagonists. METHODS Thirty-three patients participated. The implant superstructures of the first molar and its antagonists were scanned with an intraoral scanner every 3 months. The amount of attrition was calculated in relation to the various materials used for the superstructure, and differences were analyzed statistically (P < 0.05). RESULTS Attrition of the implant superstructure was 110 ± 30 µm for monolithic zirconia and 105 ± 27 µm for resin-veneered metal after 12 months. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups. In contrast, attrition of the antagonists was 75 ± 25 µm for zirconia and 105 ± 20 µm for resin-veneered metal after 12 months. A statistically significant difference in the attrition levels between the two groups was observed after 9 and 12 months. CONCLUSION During the 12-month observation period, there was no difference in superstructure attrition between zirconia and resin-veneered metal. Attrition of the antagonists was higher for hybrid composite resin-veneered metal than for zirconia, suggesting that surface roughness affected the degree of attrition.