Search

Background: Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) is a treatment to deal with microorganisms, which is limited to treating microbial biofilms due to poor light penetration. Sonodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (SACT) can be used for circumventing the limitations of aPDT to inhibit the polymicrobial biofilms. The objective of this study has been focused on the simultaneous use of aPDT and SACT, which is called photo-sonodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (P-SACT) to inhibit the biofilms of periopathogens bacteria on surfaces of the titanium dental implants., Materials and Methods: Following synthesis and confirmation of Chitosan Nanoparticles-Indocyanine green (CNPs-ICG) as photo-sonosensitizer, the mature biofilm model of the polymicrobial synergism of periopathogens was formed on the surface of the titanium dental implants. The quantitative and qualitative evaluations of periopathogens biofilms were performed using microbial viability and scanning electron microscopy analysis of the following groups of treatment modalities (n = 5): 1- Control (periopathogens biofilm without treatment), 2- ICG, 3- CNPs-ICG, 4- diode laser, 5- aPDT/ICG, 6- aPDT/CNPs-ICG, 7- ultrasound, 8- SACT/ICG, 9- SACT/CNPs-ICG, 10- PSACT/ICG, 11- PSACT/CNPs-ICG, and 12-0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX)., Results: A significant reduction in the log 10 CFU/mL of periopathogens was observed in the groups treated with aPDT/ICG, aPDT/CNPs-ICG, SACT/ICG, SACT/CNPs-ICG, PSACT/ICG, PSACT/CNPs-ICG, and 0.2% CHX up to 5.3, 6.5, 5.6, 6.6, and 8.8 log, respectively, when compared with control group (P < 0.05). PSACT/CNPs-ICG group demonstrated significantly higher capacity in eliminating the periopathogens biofilm compared with other groups (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between PSACT/CNPs-ICG and 0.2% CHX (P > 0.05). Microscopic images revealed that biofilms treated with PSACT were comprised mainly of deformed and dead cells., Conclusions: These results highlight the potential of PSACT/CNPs-ICG for the decontamination of the dental implant surfaces from the polymicrobial synergism of periopathogens biofilm., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare short implants (SH; 4-8 mm) to standard implants (ST; longer than 8 mm) in edentulous jaws, evaluating pri-implant marginal bone levels (MBLs) changes, implant failures (IFs), complications, and prosthesis failures (PFs)., Materials and Methods: Electronic searches were conducted through the PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov to locate all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SH to ST. Meta-analysis procedures were performed on the weighted mean difference (WMD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) of MBLs using Stata., Results: Twenty-three articles were included in this review. The WMD of MBLs when comparing SH to ST in both jaws up to 1-year follow-up was statistically significant preferring SH (WMD: -0.09 [CI: -0.12, -0.06], I 2 : 67.0%). The efficacy of SH vs ST on SMD of MBLs was moderate (SMD: -0.43 [CI: -0.57, -0.28], I 2 : 55.7%). There were no significant differences in IF (RR: 0.75 [0.44,1.27]) and PF (RR: 0.58 (0.22,1.581), and significantly higher biological complications (RR: 0.25 [0.15, 0.40]) for SH was observed compared to the ST in both jaws up to 1-year follow-up., Conclusions: SH and ST implants showed the comparable outcomes except biological complication preferring SH. Future systematic review and meta-analysis with longer and larger RCTs are required to confirm the present outcomes., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Short implants have been proposed as an alternative for the rehabilitation of atrophic edentulous areas. Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of 4‐mm implants vs longer implants in the atrophic posterior mandibles. Materials and Methods: Eleven patients with bilateral atrophic mandibles were rehabilitated with two to four 4‐mm implants and 10 or 8‐mm long implants in augmented bone using Guided Bone Regeneration procedure. One side of the mandibles was randomly allocated to vertical augmentation with mixed autogenous bone and allograft. Implants were placed in both sides of the mandible after 6 months, and loaded after another 2 months. Subsequently, implant and prosthesis failures, marginal bone levels changes, and any complication were evaluated after 1‐year follow‐up. Results: In this study, one patient dropped out and no failures occurred. However, 4‐mm implants loss of 0.30 ± 0.34 mm peri‐implant marginal bone and long implants loss of 0.47 ± 0.54 mm marginal bone were observed after 1‐year of follow‐up. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (difference = −0.16 ± 0.68 mm; P = 0.46). Eight complications occurred in five augmented sites of the patients, and no complication was found to occur in the short implants sites. Conclusions: One‐year after loading, 4‐mm implants had similar outcomes as long implants in augmented bone. Therefore, short implants might be a feasible treatment in atrophic mandibles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the accuracy and errors of linear measurements of mesiodistal dimensions of Kennedy Class III edentulous space using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in comparison with clinical measurements. Materials and Methods: Nineteen Kennedy Class III dental arches were evaluated. An impression was made of each dental arch and poured with dental stone. The distance was measured on dental cast using a digital Vernier caliper with an accuracy of 0.1mm and on CBCT scans. Finally, the linear mesiodistal measurements were compared and the accuracy of CBCT technique was evaluated by calculating absolute value of errors, intra-class correlation coefficient and simple linear regression model. Results: In comparison with the cast method, estimation of size on CBCT scans had an error of -8.46% (underestimation) to 5.21% (overestimation). In 26.5% of the cases, an accepted error of ±1% was found. The absolute value of errors was found to be in the range of 0.21-8.46mm with an average value of 2.86 ±2.30mm. Conclusions: Although the measurements revealed statistically significant differences, this does not indicate a lower accuracy for the CBCT technique. In fact, CBCT can provide some information as a paraclinical tool and the clinician can combine these data with clinical data and achieve greater accuracy. Undoubtedly, calibration of data collected by clinical and paraclinical techniques and the clinician's expertise in use of CBCT software programs can increase the accuracy of implant placement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Implant primary stability is one of the important factors in achieving implant success. The osteotome technique may improve primary stability in patients with poor bone quality. The aim of this study was to compare implant stability using two different techniques namely osteotome versus conventional drilling in the posterior maxilla. Materials and Methods: In this controlled randomized clinical trial, 54 dental implants were placed in 32 patients; 29 implants were placed in the osteotome group and 25 in the conventional drilling group. Implant stability was assessed at four time intervals namely at baseline, one, two and three months after implant placement using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Results: Primary stability based on implant stability quotient (ISQ) units was 71.4±7 for the osteotome group and 67.4±10 for the control group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in implant stability at any of the measurement times. In each group, changes in implant stability from baseline to one month and also from two months to three months post-operatively were not significant but from one month to two months after implant placement, implant stability showed a significant increase in both groups. Conclusion: The results of this study revealed that in both techniques, good implant stability was achieved and osteotome technique did not have any advantage compared to conventional drilling in this regard. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of the present randomized clinical trial was to evaluate marginal bone loss around two types of implants modified at the neck area: Nobel Active and Nobel Replace Groovy, both manufactured by Nobel Biocare. Materials and Methods: A total of 25 Nobel Active and 21 Nobel Replace Groovy implants were included in the present study. The implants were placed based on the relevant protocol and patient inclusion and exclusion criteria. The amount of bone loss around implants was compared at 6 and 12-month intervals using digital periapical radiographs. Results: The mean bone loss values in the Nobel Active and Nobel Replace Groovy groups were 0.682 mm and 0.645 mm, respectively, with no statistically significant difference based on the results of independent t-test (P=0.802). Conclusion: Use of both implant types yielded favorable results, with high durability. The two implant types exhibited no superiority over each other in terms of bone loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]