Search

The aim of this article was to compare baseline residual ridge height using Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and panoramic radiographs. A secondary aim was to examine the magnitude of vertical bone gain 6 months after trans-crestal sinus augmentation and compare it between operators. Thirty patients, who underwent trans-crestal sinus augmentation simultaneously with dental implant placement, were included in this retrospective analysis. Surgeries were done by 2 experienced surgeons (EM and EG) using the same surgical protocol and materials. Preoperative residual ridge height was measured on panoramic and CBCT images. The final bone height and the magnitude of the vertical augmentation were measured on panoramic X ray taken 6 months after surgery. Mean residual ridge height measured preoperatively using CBCT was 6.07 ± 1.38 mm, whereas these same measurements on the panoramic radiographs yielded similar results (6.08 ± 1.43 mm), which were statistically insignificant (P = .535). Postoperative healing was uneventful in all cases. All 30 implants were successfully osseointegrated at 6 months. The mean overall final bone height was 12.87 ± 1.39 mm (12.61 ± 1.21 and 13.39 ± 1.63 mm for operators EM and EG, respectively; P = .19). Likewise, mean postoperative bone height gain was 6.78 ± 1.57 mm, which was 6.68 ± 1.32 and 6.99 ± 2.06 mm for operators EM and EG, respectively (P = .66). A moderate positive correlation was found between residual bone height and final bone height (r = 0.43, P = .002). A moderate negative correlation was found between residual bone height and augmented bone height (r = -0.53, P = .002). Sinus augmentation performed trans-crestally produce consistent results with minimal interoperator differences between experienced clinicians. Both CBCT and panoramic radiographs produced similar assessment of the preoperative residual bone height.

Background: Chlorhexidine (CHX) is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent commonly used in medicine. Application of (CHX) during abutment connection reduced the bacterial load at the implant-abutment interface. We hypothesize this treatment may consequently reduce peri-implant soft tissue inflammation and marginal bone loss., Purpose: To evaluate the effect of a single application of CHX gel inside the dental implant internal hexagon on peri-implant tissue., Methods: Forty patients were recruited to this randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial. At the time of implant installation, a 4-mm healing abutment was connected to the implant. In the test group, chlorhexidine gel 1% was applied inside the implant hex, whereas control implants did not receive any gel. Clinical and radiographic measurements included soft tissue recession (REC), plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), keratinized mucosa width (KM), probing depth (PD), and a peri-apical parallel x-ray. Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) was collected for cytokine analysis. t-Test was used to compare changes from baseline to 3 months. Mann-Whitney U test and t test were used to compare test and control groups., Results: Twenty patients in the test group and 17 in the control group completed the study. One implant in the control group failed to osteointegrate. There were no significant differences between the control and test groups for REC changes, bone loss, and PD. GI was significantly lower in the test group after 1 week (1.79 ± 0.24 vs 0.75 ± 0.18, respectively) and 3 months (1.18 ± 0.21 vs 0.25 ± 0.12, respectively) although PI was equal. At 3 months, interleukin 1-β (IL1-β) was higher in the control group (p < 0.01) and a positive correlation was found between GI and IL1-β (r s  = 0.60424, p = 0.00032)., Conclusions: Application of chlorhexidine gel reduced inflammation and IL1-β levels in the peri-implant soft tissue., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objectives: To examine whether a surgeons' position affects the axial angulation of dental implants placed freehand., Method and Materials: Implants' axial angulation was assessed on digital panoramic radiographs. An occlusal line was plotted based on the neighboring teeth/crowns. The mesial angle between the long axis of the implant and the occlusal line was measured. In addition, post-hoc ideal implant-positioning planning was done on the panoramic digital image, and the angle of the intersection between the long axis of the actual and post-hoc ideal implant was measured. Student t test for unpaired observations and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov nonparametric tests were utilized to compare the ipsi- and contralateral sides and between clinicians., Results: Seventy-seven patients (149 implants) were eligible for the study. Implants had slight mesial inclination (mean 97.7 ± 8.7 degrees) which was similar for both the ipsi- (98.2 ± 8.4 degrees) and contralateral sides (97.2 ± 9.1 degrees), P = .491. For the post-hoc planning versus actual placement comparison, the overall median (interquartile range) of implant angular deviation was minimal (-0.25 degrees [-2.98, +3.47]). This was true for both the ipsilateral (-0.5 degrees [-2.9, +2.9]) and contralateral (-0.2 [-4.2, +5.4]) sides, P = .55. For the actual versus post-hoc planning, most observations clustered around the midline (zero to minimal deviation), while for the implant to occlusal plane angle, a tendency towards slight mesial angulation was observed., Conclusions: Dental implants placed freehand by experienced clinicians have only slight axial deviation as measured from post-hoc optimal position. Implants placed in ipsilateral and contralateral sides and by left- and right-dominant-hand clinicians had similar angulations.

Purpose: To describe the postoperative complications following lateral wall sinus augmentation using (poly L-lactideco-ε-caprolactone; PLCL) and natural polysaccharides polymers-coated bovine bone (PBB). The secondary aims were to examine histologic findings and to propose complication management alternatives., Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 61 subjects who underwent 67 lateral wall sinus augmentation procedures using PBB in the standard protocol. In cases that presented complications, treatment included additional antibiotic therapy, implant removal, or sinus reentry and total removal of the grafting material. In three cases, biopsy specimens were taken from the sinuses, and histologic analyses were performed., Results: The prevalence of postoperative complications was 32.8% (22 of 67 cases) in 18 of the patients (29.5%). The most prevalent symptoms were persistent pain (68.2%), swelling (63.6%), and oroantral fistula (54.5%). Radiographic signs appeared in 45.5% of the complications. A total of 24 implants failed; thus, an overall 80.3% survival rate was established at 19 months. The vast majority of complications (86.4%) were treated eventually with reentry surgery and revealed that the sinus was full with granulation tissue surrounding pieces of a nonossified rubber-like material. In cases where implants were placed, nonosseointegrated implants were surrounded by soft tissue. The sinus was cleaned thoroughly; the graft material remnants were removed together with inflamed parts of the sinus membrane, followed by chlorhexidine and saline lavages. In the biopsy specimens taken from the sinus cavity, there were no histologic features of new bone formation around the grafted material., Conclusion: Lateral wall maxillary sinus augmentation using PBB was associated with an acute sinus infection histologic appearance and with a 7-times-higher failure rate compared with previous reports. This serious adverse event suggests that PBB cannot be recommended for maxillary sinus augmentations.

Objective: To evaluate implant and patient characteristics 4 to 8 years after implant installation in a study involving immediate fixed restoration of dental implants. Method and materials: The study was a follow-up of treated generalized chronic periodontitis patients who received immediate restorations on dental implants as part of a previous study. The patients were examined clinically and radiographically at implant placement, 6 months, 1 year, and 4 to 8 years later. Supportive periodontal therapy (SPT), teeth and implant probing pocket depth (TPPD and IPPD), bleeding on probing (BOP [teeth, TBOP; implant, IBOP]), and bone level (BL) measurements around implants were documented. Cases were divided into three groups according to annual SPT rate: 0.00 to 0.99/year (SPT0), 1.00 to 1.99/year (SPT1), 2.00 or more/year (SPT2). Results: Twelve patients, with 26 implants and 242 teeth, were included. The mean ± standard deviation follow-up period was 6.08 ± 1.25 years (range 4.04 to 7.94 years). All implants in the follow-up group were osseointegrated and survived during the follow-up period. The mean number of SPT appointments was 6.17 ± 5.65. A weak negative correlation was found between SPT rate and ΔTPPD (-0.24, P = .0005), whereas a strong negative correlation was found between SPT rate and ΔIPPD (-0.76, P = .0005). Negative correlations were found between SPT rate and ∆TBOP (-0.20, P = .003), and between SPT rate and ∆IBOP (-0.5, P = .009). A moderate correlation was found between SPT rate and ΔBL (0.46, P = .02). Conclusion: SPT has a significant positive effect on PPD, BOP, and on implant BLs in long-term follow-up and should be an essential part of implant therapy.

The aim of this prospective cohort observational field trial was to examine 1-year survival and success rates of a recently introduced tapered implant system with switched platform conical abutments and to evaluate patient related outcomes of therapy. Partially edentulous patients aged between 18 and 75 years, with available bone height for dental implants ≥10 mm desiring to restore the missing tooth/teeth with implant supported restoration, were recruited by 7 periodontists in their respective private practices. Dental implants were installed according to standard implant therapy protocol. Three to 6 months postoperatively, after evaluating interim implant success, implants were restored by the referring dentists. Patient, Ramfjord teeth, and implant data, including baseline and 1-year postoperative, were collected. A total of 60 patients were recruited and received 117 implants. Complete 1-year clinical and radiographic data were available for 83 and 65 implants, respectively. Two implants failed during the first year, resulting in a 1-year survival rate of 98.3%. Mean implant probing pocket depth was 2.29 ± 0.84 mm. Mean radiographic bone distance from implant's shoulder at the mesial and distal sites at 1 year was 0.66 ± 0.5 and 0.79 ± 0.64mm, respectively, resulting in a success rate of 95.4%. Patient subjective evaluation of therapy exhibited a median pain experience of 1 and median esthetics, function, and general satisfaction evaluation of 10 on a scale of 1 to 10. The tapered conical connection dental implant system, used in private dental practices, shows good 1-year survival and success rates that are similar to other implant systems on the market.

Objective: The purpose of the study was to assess the clinical accuracy of a novel open-lattice-frame implant positioning system by evaluating the deviation between planned and actual implant positions on pre- and postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients treated with dental implants. Secondary aims were to record surgical time from first incision to end of implant surgery and start of suturing, and to record patient and surgeon satisfaction from the implant surgical procedure. Pre- and postoperative CBCT of 10 patients receiving 18 dental implants were used to generate implant angular deviations and implant shoulder and apex deviations. Mean angular deviation was 2.96 ± 1.31 degrees (range 0.75 to 5.60 degrees). Mean shoulder and apex deviations were 1.07 ± 0.49 mm (range 0.38 to 1.85 mm) and 1.35 ± 0.57 mm (range 0.52 to 2.19 mm), respectively. Mean time from first incision to start of suturing was 24 ± 7 minutes. Patient satisfaction ranged between 8 and 10, and surgeon satisfaction regarding the procedure ranged between 9 and 10, on a scale of 1 to 10. The open-lattice-frame implant positioning system provided adequate accuracy, and may aid in improving patient-related and surgeon-related outcomes by improving surgical accuracy and shortening surgical treatment duration.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare periapical radiographs (PA) and panoramic radiographs (PAN) in the measurement of proximal bone height around implants., Method and Materials: Patients files that contained digital PAN and PA together with information on implant lengths and diameters were selected for this study. For each radiograph, the implant size served as reference for calibration. Proximal radiographic bone levels and the linear distance between the bone crest and implant shoulder were measured twice by one examiner. Paired t test was used to assess intra-examiner variability and differences between the two radiographic methods. Correlation was then assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient test. Significance level was determined at 5%., Results: For the PAN measurements, the median mesial distances from bone crest to implant shoulder were 0.53 and 0.56 mm (first and second sets, P = .53). Likewise, for distal measurements these readings were 0.92 and 0.86 mm respectively (P = .66). For PA measurements, the corresponding measurements were 0.33 and 0.44 mm (P = .48) and 0.99 and 0.99 mm (P = .42), respectively. When PAN and PA measurements were compared, no statistically significant differences were detected between the two radiographic modalities. A very high positive correlation (r > 0.91) was attained for the PAN - PA measurements (P < .0001)., Conclusion: PAN are potentially as reliable and reproducible as PA for the assessment of proximal bone height around dental implants.

The relationship of dental implants with neighboring teeth will affect both occlusal relationship and distribution of forces; thus, the purpose of this study was to examine implants' axial relationship with adjacent and opposing teeth/implants. Data of dental implants patients was retrieved. Panoramic X rays were digitized. Computer-based software was used to measure the angular relationship between the implants and adjacent/opposing teeth and implants. Data was further sorted by the mode of placement and implants position. 50 patients (219 implants) were included. Mean angle to adjacent tooth/implant was 178.71° ± 9.18° (range 129.7°-206°). Implants were more parallel to adjacent teeth (180.99° ± 1.06°) than to adjacent implants (176.32° ± 0.54°; P = .0001). Mean angular relationship to opposite tooth was 167.88° ± 8.92° (range 137.7°-179.8°). Implants that were placed freehand or with positional guide had similar intra-arch relationship (178.22° and 178.81°, respectively) and similar inter-arch angulations (164.46° and 167.74°). Molars had greater deviation of the angular relationship (175.54°) compared to premolars (181.62°) and incisors (180.55°, P = .0001). Implants placed in the maxilla had smaller axial deviation compared to implants in the mandible (180.41° ± 0.64 vs 177.14° ± 1.02; P = .0081). Good axial relationship may be obtained in most implants placed by an experienced clinician, even when placed freehand. The mandibular posterior region is more prone to axial deviation and as such requires special attention.

Purpose: To evaluate implant and patient characteristics in a prospective clinical study involving immediate fixed restoration of delayed placement of dental implants., Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed with generalized chronic periodontitis and previously treated were accepted into the study when they expressed a wish to receive immediate restoration of dental implants. Treatment planning and implant placement were computer assisted, using computerized tomography, planning software, and a surgical template. Patients received abutments and cemented provisional prostheses no later than 72 hours following implant surgery. Patients were followed at 2 and 4 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months., Results: Eighteen patients were accepted and completed the study, ages ranged from 34 to 69 years (mean 54.5±8.5 years). Five patients (27.8%) were smokers (2.5 to 60 pack years). Fifty implants were placed, ranging between 1 to 8 implants per patient. Median implant length was 13 mm (range, 10 to 13 mm) and median implant diameter was 3.75 mm (range, 3.75 to 5 mm). Mean insertion torque was 43 NCm±6.2 SD (range 30 to 50 NCm). Mean implant stability quotient was 71±11 (range 37 to 85). One implant in a patient who smoked and three implants in another patient who smoked failed for a total of four failed implants. At 12 months, the overall survival rate was 92% (100% and 73% among nonsmokers and smokers, respectively)., Conclusions: The survival of immediately restored dental implants in periodontally treated patients is greater than 90%. Smokers with a past history of chronic periodontitis seem to have a lower implant survival rate.

The treatment of furcation defects is one of the most challenging aspects of periodontal therapy. The periodontal therapist can utilize various treatment modalities, including: non surgical root debridement, local drug delivery, open flap surgery, tunneling, root resection, guided tissue regeneration and extraction. Each treatment method has its advantages and disadvantages. The dilemmas concerning tooth prognosis and prosthetic considerations in such cases are especially demanding, especially in comparison to implant therapy. The clinician's decision in these situations must comply with the objective condition in the particular case based on his abilities and knowledge and the patient expectations. In order to evaluate the relevancy of root resection procedures we reviewed the literature focusing on root resection therapy prognosis as well as the different therapeutic alternatives for furcated molar teeth. Root resection treatment guidelines, indications and contraindication are presented along with clinical examples. Root resection is currently a relevant treatment modality for furcation defects. By using proper case selection, good surgical technique, proper prosthetic treatment and good periodontal supportive care, a good 5 year prognosis can be achieved and complications can be minimized. In light of the growing literature concerning dental implants complications, extraction and dental implant placement should be recommended as the last option when all other conservative options cannot be used, or following their failure.

Purpose: There is little information available about radiographic bone changes around immediately restored implants in periodontally compromised patients. The aims of this study were to evaluate the effect of immediate restoration on radiographic bone changes and to compare radiographic changes between arches and between healed and extraction sites in periodontally susceptible patients., Materials and Methods: Patients received periodontal treatment. "All in one" implant surgery was then performed: Hopeless teeth were extracted, debridement around remaining adjacent teeth was performed, implants were inserted guided by a surgical stent, and a prefabricated screwed provisional restoration was immediately delivered on selected implants. Periapical radiographs using a parallelism appliance were taken at implant surgery and 6 and 12 months postsurgery. The distance between the alveolar crest and the implant shoulder was measured at the mesial and distal aspect of each implant. Bone changes were compared between immediately restored, submerged, and nonrestored implants; between arches; and between healed and extraction sites., Results: Nineteen patients received 74 implants. Twelve implants in 4 patients failed within the first 6 months. Mean bone changes (+/- SE) between baseline and 12 months ranged between -1.19 +/- 0.19 mm and -1.88 +/- 0.3 mm. No difference was found between restored versus nonrestored sites or between maxillary and mandibular sites. Bone loss was slightly higher in healed sites., Conclusions: First-year bone changes around immediately restored dental implants in periodontally susceptible patients were slightly higher than most reports in the literature. This indicates a potential influence of periodontal disease on the success rate of dental implants.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival of dental implants in periodontally susceptible patients using immediate loading/restoration (ILR) protocols and the factors that modulate this response., Methods: Systemically healthy patients who were treated previously for chronic periodontitis and who required implant therapy were recruited. Following data collection, "surgical templates" and provisional fixed restorations were fabricated. Transgingival implants were inserted, and surgical measurements were performed. After abutment connection, the crown/bridge was relined and cemented. Patients were monitored for 12 months, at which time final measurements were performed., Results: Twenty patients (49 implants) completed this study; five implants failed and were removed (90% survival rate). All implants were removed during the first 6 months. At 12 months, the mean implants' probing depth was 2.87 +/- 0.9 mm. The mean electronic mobility testing device value (-1.3 +/- 0.7) was slightly higher than at baseline (-3.53 +/- 10.7). Radiographic bone loss ranged between -1.24 and 2.77 mm (mean +/- SD: 0.91 +/- 0.2 mm). All of the implants (16) that were inserted in the premolar region were successful, whereas three of nine implants in the molar region and two of 24 implants in the canine/incisor region failed (P = 0.0278). Survival in the immediately loaded group (83%) was slightly lower than in the immediately restored group (96%); however, these differences did not reach statistical significance. None of the other variables (smoking, arch, stability, implant length and diameter, and bone width) affected the outcome of this procedure., Conclusions: ILR protocols are predictable alternatives in periodontally susceptible patients. Results in the molar regions suggested that careful consideration should be given to implants placed in these sites. Long-term success in these patients has not been addressed.

Background: The growing popularity of non-submerged dental implants in recent years requires a greater emphasis on microbial plaque control. Chlorhexidine (CHX), the most commonly used mouthwash in implant surgery, is sometimes associated with tooth staining and alteration in taste perception. Amine fluoride/stannous fluoride (AmF/SnF2) mouthwash has been shown to have anti-infective properties; however, it has not been tested as an adjunct anti-infective means in non-submerged dental implants. The purpose of this trial was to compare AmF/SnF2 and CHX mouthwashes as adjuncts to single-stage dental implants., Methods: Thirty-three patients aged 34 to 79 (mean 54.30 +/- 8.69 SD) requiring dental implants were accepted into the study. Following comprehensive periodontal therapy patients received one to three non-submerged dental implants (maxilla: 17; mandible: 45; anterior: 3, posterior: 59). After surgery patients were given analgesics and antibiotics as well as 2,400 ml of coded mouthwash bottles previously randomized between the two above mentioned formulations. Clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at baseline and 3 and 12 months post-surgery., Results: Twelve-month survival rates were 100% and 92.9% for the AmF/SnF2 and CHX groups, respectively. Compliance was slightly higher in the AmF/SnF2 group (84.35% +/- 3.39% versus 78.15% +/- 4.59% SE) but statistically similar. There was no statistically significant difference between the AmF/SnF2 and CHX groups in staining index at 3 months (1.519 +/- 0.22 versus 1.457 +/- 0.24 SE) and patient subjective evaluation of the mouthwashes. Radiographic bone loss was 0.79 +/- 0.23 and 1 +/- 0.13 SE at 3 months and 1.06 +/- 0.13 and 1.27 +/- 0.25 at 12 months for the CHX and AmF/SnF2 groups, respectively; the difference was statistically insignificant (P = 0.388 and 0.504, respectively)., Conclusion: Both CHX and AmF/SnF2 mouthwashes can be used post-surgically after one-stage implant surgery.

Immediate loading of dental implants aims to shorten treatment time. Stability at implant insertion is critical to success. The aim of this prospective study is to compare primary implant stability, measured by insertion torque (IT) with resonance frequency analysis (RFA) expressed as ISQ. Patients requiring implant therapy were treated by teeth extractions, placement of 1-9 MIS implants, bone augmentation as needed and fixed provisional restorations. We measured IT and ISQ for non-submerged loaded (NSL), non-submerged non loaded (NSNL) and submerged (S) implants. 14 patients, aged 34-79 years, were recruited. 53 implants were inserted (38 maxillary & 15 mandibular). 30 implants, 18 in fresh extraction sites, were immediately loaded. ISQ was 63.3 +/- 2.8 (S.E.), 67.2 +/- 3.5 (S.E.) and 58.8 +/- 2.7 for the NSL, NSNL and S groups, respectively (p = 0.0459). IT was 40.4 +/- 1.8 Ncm, 46 +/- 4.0 and 35.3 +/- 2.1 (p = 0.0646). ISQ and IT were not statistically different between extraction vs. non-extraction and augmented vs. non-augmented sites. We found a significant difference in IT between maxillary & mandibular sites, and a significant correlation between ISQ & IT and between ISQ & implant diameter. These data suggest that ISQ is correlated to IT and is influenced mainly by implant diameter and not by implant length, location or bone level. Finally, a case including immediate implants, bone augmentation and immediate provisional restoration is presented.

Dental implants are a functional and esthetic solution to partial and total edentulism. The initial success rate of this treatment modality is 90-95%. But, that treatment modality is not free of complications. One of the rare complications yet, with severe clinical results is fracture of dental implants. The current literature review presents the various causative factors that may lead to implant fracture. Implant failures may be sorted into groups by the timing of their appearance, or by the origin of failure. Fractures belong to the group of late complications, caused by a biomechanical overload. Overload may be caused by inappropriate seat of the superstructure, in-line arrangement of the implants, leverage, heavy occlusal forces (bruxing, clenching), location of the implant and the size of the implant or metal fatigue. Good clinical examinations and correct treatment plans may reduce the risk of implant fracture.

Fracture of dental implants is a rare phenomenon with severe clinical results. In this article, the literature is reviewed and various causative factors that may lead to fracture are presented. Galvanic activity has not been mentioned before as a possible cause for implant fracture, yet, it can occur at the level of contact with the superstructure. This is illustrated by the case of a titanium implant restored with a non-precious porcelain-fused-to-metal cemented crown that fractured 4 years after loading. The radiographs show alveolar bone resorption around the fixture. Metallurgical analysis of the implant indicated that the fracture was caused by metal fatigue and that the crown metal, a nickel-chromium-molybdenum alloy, exhibited corrosion. These findings suggest a new explanation for implant fractures; cytotoxic nickel ions, leaching from the base metal alloy may cause bone resorption. This in turn leads to increased mobility, facilitating washout of the luting cement. Contact of the base metal with titanium in the presence of oral fluids produces galvanic currents that hasten corrosion and leaching out of nickel ions, thus leading to further bone resorption. Loss of bone support allows lateral bending moments that cause metal fatigue, eventually leading to fracture. Therefore, good treatment planning and appropriate case selection might have prevented this fracture. Furthermore, the use of nonprecious metal alloy for the crown's infrastructure had further contribution to the chain of events that led to the implant's fracture.