Search

Background: Consistent bone changes occur after tooth removal, often compromising the success of implants placed within the socket left to natural healing The long-term effect of ridge preservation on implant outcomes is still unclear., Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess success and survival rates of implants placed in extraction sockets, with spontaneous healing, or grafted with cortical porcine bone, or collagenated corticocancellous porcine bone., Materials and Methods: Ninety patients in need for a single premolar/molar tooth extraction and an implant treatment were selected for the present study. Patients were randomly distributed among 3 groups: sites that healed naturally (ctrl), or sites that received ridge preservation with either cortical (cort) or collagenated corticocancellous porcine bone (coll). Three months after, all the experimental sites were reentered to insert implants. Marginal bone levels were recorded; soft tissues were analyzed and summarized with the Pink Esthetic Score (PES). Forty-two patients out of 90 (initial cohort study) completed the entire follow-up of 4 years., Results: Cumulative survival and success rates for all implants were 100% at a 4-year evaluation. Mean marginal bone loss (MBL) was 1.14 ± 0.23 mm in the cort group, 1.13 ± 0.29 mm in the coll group, and 1.92 ± 0.07 mm in the ctrl group. There were no significant differences between the 2 grafting materials but MBL was significantly greater in the nongrafted sites (P value < .001). The PES resulted significantly better (9.42 ± 0.75) for the cort group than for the coll group (8.53 ± 1.18) and ctrl group (6.07 ± 1.89) at 4-year evaluation., Conclusions: Ridge preservation was more effective than natural healing in preserving marginal bone and in achieving better esthetic outcomes around implants 4 years after placement. The cortical porcine bone showed better clinical outcomes than collagenated corticocancellous porcine bone., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Patient-centered outcomes are being given great attention by the dental scientific community. The Oral Health Impact Profile -14 questionnaire (OHIP-14) has been introduced to address patients' success criteria when describing the impact of oral rehabilitations on quality of life (OHrQoL)., Methods: Thirty-five patients wearing a full-arch implant-prosthesis being in place between 4 and 6 years before this analysis were considered eligible and then enrolled in the present retrospective study. According to their prosthetic anamnesis, two groups were defined: delayed loading group (IL-group) and immediate loading group (IL-group). At the moment of analysis, clinical and radiographic parameters were collected, and patients were asked to complete the Oral Health Impact Profile -14 questionnaire (OHIP-14) in order to measure their OHrQoL., Results: Independent t-test showed total OHIP-14 scores to be not significantly different between groups; however, the domains "functional limitation" and "physical disability" resulted significantly higher in patients within the DL-group. On the contrary, social disability was higher in the IL-group. When the comparison was performed taking sex into account, no significant differences between groups were highlighted. Instead, the stratification for years of follow-up led to significant evidences. When the follow-up was shorter (less-than-5 years), the functional limitation reported scores were higher., Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the analysis supports the absence of significant differences between immediate loading and delayed loading full-arch protocol in term of clinical, radiological parameters and OHrQoL.

Background: Implant stability is commonly related to insertion torque. Recently, it has been suggested that higher insertion torque may lead to greater bone resorption., Purpose: The aim of the present randomized clinical study was to evaluate the role of different insertion torque values in terms of implant success, marginal bone loss, and facial soft tissues recession., Materials and Methods: Patients requiring a single dental implant were recruited and randomized to receive one of two implants with the same macro-geometry but different cutting designs. First group consists of a 90 degrees cutting groove know as self-tapping implant, and the second group known as Blossom™ cutting groove. (Intra-Lock, Boca Raton, Florida). The insertion torque (IT) was assessed and two groups followed: high-IT (≥50 Ncm) group and regular-IT (<50 Ncm) group. After 3 months, all the implants were restored. At baseline, buccal bone thickness (BBT) was recorded. During the 3-year survey, the following outcomes had been registered: implant failures and success, radiographic marginal bone level around dental implant (MBL) and facial soft tissue level (FSTL)., Results: A hundred and sixteen implants were placed in healed sites. The overall survival rate after 3 years was 96.5%. The Cumulative Success Rate was 91.3% for the High IT group and 98.2% for the Regular IT group. The mean marginal bone loss and facial soft tissue recession, at a 3-year evaluation, were significantly greater for the High-IT group and in the mandible than that reached in the Regular-IT group and in the maxilla., Conclusion: Present findings showed that implants placed with higher insertion torque in mandible led to greater bone resorption and mucosal recession than that registered for implants placed with a regular IT. Moreover, sites with a thick buccal bone wall (≥1 mm) showed smaller recession at the facial soft tissue level after 3 years., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)