1. Comparison of the transformation temperatures of heat-activated Nickel-Titanium orthodontic archwires by two different techniques
- Author
-
Maria Therese S. Galang-Boquiren, Carla A. Evans, David W. Berzins, Tzong Guang Peter Tsay, Grace Viana, Noor Aminah Obaisi, and Spiro Megremis
- Subjects
Hot Temperature ,Materials science ,02 engineering and technology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Differential scanning calorimetry ,Recovery method ,Nickel ,Materials Testing ,Orthodontic Wires ,Humans ,Standard test ,General Materials Science ,Composite material ,General Dentistry ,Titanium ,Austenite ,Metallurgy ,Temperature ,030206 dentistry ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,Elasticity ,Mechanics of Materials ,Nickel titanium ,0210 nano-technology ,Dental Alloys - Abstract
Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the suitability of the Bend and Free Recovery (BFR) method as a standard test method to determine the transformation temperatures of heat-activated Ni-Ti orthodontic archwires. This was done by determining the transformation temperatures of two brands of heat-activated Ni-Ti orthodontic archwires using the both the BFR method and the standard method of Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC). The values obtained from the two methods were compared with each other and to the manufacturer-listed values. Methods Forty heat-activated Ni-Ti archwires from both Rocky Mountain Orthodontics (RMO) and Opal Orthodontics (Opal) were tested using BFR and DSC. Round (0.016 inches) and rectangular (0.019 × 0.025 inches) archwires from each manufacturer were tested. The austenite start temperatures (A s ) and austenite finish temperatures (A f ) were recorded. Results For four of the eight test groups, the BFR method resulted in lower standard deviations than the DSC method, and, overall, the average standard deviation for BFR testing was slightly lower than for DSC testing. Statistically significant differences were seen between the transformation temperatures obtained from the BFR and DSC test methods. However, the A f temperatures obtained from the two methods were remarkably similar with the mean differences ranging from 0.0 to 2.1 °C: A f Opal round (BFR 26.7 °C, DSC 27.6 °C) and rectangular (BFR 27.6 °C, DSC 28.6 °C); A f RMO round (BFR 25.5 °C, DSC 25.5 °C) and rectangular (BFR 28.0 °C, DSC 25.9 °C). Significant differences were observed between the manufacturer-listed transformation temperatures and those obtained with BFR and DSC testing for both manufacturers. Significance The results of this study suggest that the Bend and Free Recovery method is suitable as a standard method to evaluate the transformation temperatures of heat-activated Ni-Ti orthodontic archwires.
- Published
- 2016