Search

Background & Objectives: In India, vector-borne diseases, dengue and chikungunya are major public health concerns. In recent decades, dengue outbreaks have been reported in almost every part of India. In 2016, India recorded 101388 dengue cases and 210 deaths, including 4337 cases and six deaths in Delhi, whereas Chikungunya outbreaks were reported from several states in 2006, with 1.3 million cases. The Dengue virus (DENV) and Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) are both transmitted by the same Aedes mosquito species. DENV and CHIKV co-infections have been reported in 13 of 98 countries, with both viruses being transmitted locally. The reasons for the sudden upsurge in cases of these diseases are undetermined., Methods: From March to December 2016, a study was carried out in 66 localities of Delhi in collaboration with the Municipal Corporation of Delhi. Localities were selected on the basis of confirmed dengue cases reported during the last five years and the study area was visited once a month. A door-to-door entomological survey was conducted to identify Aedes breeding in all water-filled containers in and around houses. Both immature and mature stages of Aedes mosquitoes were collected. Mosquitoes were pooled (n≤10 each for male and female) breeding site-wise and stored in Trizol at -80°C. The Chikungunya and dengue viruses were detected using a multiplex RT-PCR., Results: A total of 981 Aedes mosquitos were distributed among 146 Pools, and DENV and CHIKV were detected using Multiplex Reverse Transcriptase-PCR. Chikungunya virus was identified in 19 pools of females captured adults, whereas dengue virus was found in 8 pools of females captured adults. There was no evidence of coinfection in any of the pools., Interpretation & Conclusion: In endemic areas, continuous surveillance for both dengue and Chikungunya viruses is required to identify and characterize these viral pathogens. This information will also help implement effective strategies to combat outbreaks produced by these emerging viral pathogens., Competing Interests: None

Background and Objective: The study is based on hypothesis that whether continuous entomological surveillance of Ae. aegypti and simultaneous appropriate interventions in key containers during non-transmission (December-May) months would have any impact on breeding of Aedes and dengue cases during the following transmission months (June-November). The impact of the surveillance and intervention measures undertaken during non-transmission months were assessed by entomological indicators namely container index (CI), house index (HI), pupal index (PI) and breteau index (BI)., Methods: A total of 28 localities of West Zone of Delhi with persistent dengue endemicity were selected for the study. Out of these localities, 20 were included in study group while other 8 localities were in control group. IEC and various Aedes breeding control activities were carried out in study group in both non-transmission and transmission season whereas control group did not have any such interventions during non-transmission months as per guidelines of MCD. These activities were undertaken by a team of investigators from NIMR and SDMC, Delhi. In control group, investigators from NIMR carried out surveillance activity to monitor the breeding of Aedes mosquito in localities., Results: Comparison of baseline data revealed that all indices in control and study group of localities were comparable and statistically non-significant (p>0.05). In both study and control groups, indices were calculated after pooling data on seasonal basis, i.e., transmission and non-transmission months for both years. The test of significance conducted on all the four indices, i.e., HI, PI, CI, and BI, revealed a significant difference (p<0.05) between the study group and control group during transmission and non-transmission months except in HI. Due to consistent intervention measures undertaken in non-transmission months in study group, reduction in CI, HI, BI and PI was observed 63%, 62%, 64% and 99% respectively during transmission months as compared to control group where increase of 59%, 102%, 73% and 71% respectively. As a result of reduction in larval indices, no dengue case (except one NS1) was observed in study group, whereas 38 dengue cases were observed in control group., Conclusion: Through this pilot study, it is concluded that proper intervention in non-transmission season reduces vector density and subsequently dengue cases in transmission season., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Delhi, the capital of India, is an important metropolitan hub for major financial and sociocultural exchanges, offering challenging threats to current public health infrastructure. In recent past, an upsurge of dengue cases in Delhi posed a significant menace to the existing dengue control policies. To reform the control strategies and take timely intervention to prevent future epidemics, an epidemiological study on the proportion of both asymptomatic and symptomatic dengue infections in selected population was conducted. The aim of the study was to investigate and assess the epidemiology of dengue infection and to estimate the proportion of asymptomatic and symptomatic dengue infections in Delhi. In this study, around 50 confirmed dengue cases, a total of 2125 individuals as household and neighbourhood contacts, with or without dengue febrile illness, were finger pricked and serologically detected as dengue positive or negative using SD Duo Bioline Rapid Diagnostic Test (SD Inc, Korea) with NS1, IgM & IgG combo test, which detected dengue virus antigen and antibodies to dengue virus in human blood. Out of 2125 individuals, 768 (36.1%) individuals showed positive dengue test with past (25.5%), primary (1.88%) or secondary (8.8%) dengue infections. Higher percentage of IgG was found in age groups 15-24 years and 25-50 years (36% each). Infants (<1 year) presented higher incidence of new infections (22% of NS1+IgM positives) as compared to adults. Further analysis revealed that out of the 226 newly infected cases (including NS1 and IgM positives), 142 (63%) were asymptomatic and 84 (37%) were symptomatic, as per WHO guidelines. Our findings also suggest that out of the total population screened, 10.6% dengue infection was either primary or secondary. On the basis of these results, it may be hypothesized that there are large number of asymptomatic dengue infections in the community as compared to reported symptomatic cases in Delhi. For the effective control of dengue transmission in such community like Delhi where dengue epidemics have frequently been encountered, it is essential to ascertain the proportion of asymptomatic dengue infections which may act as a reservoir for dengue transmission, as well as threat for developing dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF)., (Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.)