Search

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Politik is the property of Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Soziologische Revue is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Politik is the property of Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Politik is the property of Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Neue Politische Literatur is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Neue Politische Literatur is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Especially in current times of crisis and various challenges to democratic rules and processes, democracy is fundamentally dependent on public deliberation and therefore requires processes of learning and acquiring the necessary skills in dealing with political ambiguities. For the formation and cultivation of democratic consciousness, which is of great urgency in order to oppose anti-democratic attitudes and practices effectively, religious education has to take up a specific role and responsibility. From a fundamentally intersubjective orientation towards the acquisition and cultivation of tolerance of ambiguity, religious education contributes specifically in a theological sense by raising aspects of human dignity and the recognition of the other, equality regardless of gender, origin, race or religion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie is the property of Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Politik is the property of Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Die gegenwärtige Debatte um die „Krise“ der Demokratie hat nach 2016 eingesetzt und steht in engem Zusammenhang mit dem politischen Populismus. Diese Einleitung zum Schwerpunkt „Demokratie in der Krise – rechts- und sozialphilosophische Aspekte“ weist darauf hin, dass in vielen wichtigen Beiträgen zu dieser Debatte sowohl unklar bleibt, was genau eigentlich Populismus ist, als auch, welches Demokratieverständnis vorausgesetzt wird. Dies ist besonders misslich, wenn der Begriff des Populismus in Abgrenzung von der Demokratie verstanden werden soll. Meist wird ein Spannungsverhältnis zwischen Populismus und demokratischer Repräsentation betont. Die Beiträge in diesem Schwerpunkt zeigen allerdings, dass diese Sichtweise zu eng ist. Es müssen verschiedene Legitimationsebenen auseinandergehalten werden. Auch ist das Verhältnis zwischen Demokratie und Rechtsstaatlichkeit komplexer, als viele Autor*innen annehmen. Ferner erweisen sich einige der hauptsächlich vertretenen Vorschläge, wie man der populistischen Herausforderung begegnen kann, als äußerst voraussetzungsreich.

Populisten sind weder einfach Gegner der Demokratie noch des Rechtsstaats. Populismus ist vielmehr eine Herausforderung für ihre notwendige Einheit als konstitutionelle Demokratie. Das Gegenmittel ist deshalb auch nicht eine Stärkung des Rechtsstaats womöglich auf Kosten der Demokratie, sondern die Stärkung der dialektischen Einheit von Rechtsstaat und Demokratie durch die Durchsetzung der politischen Grundrechte, der Gewaltenteilung, der Rechtssicherheit und weiterer rechtsstaatlicher Elemente. Der Erfolg des Populismus würde die politische Freiheit selbst aufheben.

Copyright of Politische Vierteljahresschrift is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Dieser Beitrag untersucht die aktuellen Erzählkämpfe zwischen Populismus und Antipopulismus aus einer wissensstilistischen Perspektive am Kreuzungspunkt ihrer ästhetischen, epistemischen und politischen Dimensionen. Dazu werden zunächst die inszenatorischen Mechanismen rechtspopulistischer Entpluralisierungsstrategien am Beispiel von Arlie Russell Hochschilds Strangers in Their Own Land (2016) herausgearbeitet. Danach wird diesem populistischen Denkstil—anhand einer Analyse von David Simons und William F. Zorzis HBO‐Miniserie Show Me a Hero (2015)—ein antipopulistisches Wissen gegenübergestellt, dessen Stilistik sich mit Gilles Deleuzes Begriff des minoritär‐stotternden Nicht‐Stils auf eine pluralisierende Insistenz hin lesen lässt. Dabei wird deutlich, dass Show Me a Hero den Konflikt zwischen Rechtsstaat und Populismus als wechselseitigen Abnutzungskrieg um die Frage demokratischer Pluralität inszeniert: Die Serie zeigt einerseits, wie Demokratien durch fortwährende populistische Angriffe bis zur Kapitulation ermattet werden können, stilisiert andererseits aber auch einen Habitus rechtsstaatlicher Resilienz, der im Gegenzug die Kräfte des Populismus zu zermürben und zu redemokratisieren vermag. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie is the property of Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)