Search

Objective: Alterations in the suprachiasmatic nucleus due to underlying pathologies disrupt the circadian rhythms in people living with dementia (PLWD). Circadian rhythms significantly impact sleep, emotional, and cognitive functions, with its synchronization depending on light exposure. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of light therapy on sleep, depression, neuropsychiatric behaviors, and cognition among PLWD., Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, EBSCOhost, Ovid-MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases. The pooled effect size was calculated using the Hedges' g with random-effects model adopted in comprehensive meta-analysis software. The Cochrane risk of bias (RoB 2.0) tool evaluated the quality of studies, while Cochrane's Q and I² tests assessed heterogeneity., Results: A total of 24 studies with 1,074 participants were included. Light therapy demonstrated small-to-medium effects on improving sleep parameters: total sleep time (Hedges' g = 0.19), wake after sleep onset (Hedges' g = 0.24), sleep efficiency (Hedges' g = 0.31), sleep latency (Hedges' g = 0.35), circadian rhythm (acrophase: Hedges' g = 0.36; amplitude: Hedges' g = 0.43), number of night awakenings (Hedges' g = 0.37), sleep disturbance (Hedges'g = 0.45), and sleep quality (Hedges' g = 0.60). Light therapy showed small-to-medium effect on reducing depression (Hedges' g = -0.46) with medium-to-large effect on cyclical function (Hedges' g = -0.68) and mood-related signs and symptoms (Hedges' g = -0.84) subscales. Light therapy also demonstrated small effect on reducing neuropsychiatric behaviors (Hedges' g = -0.34) with medium-to-large effect on agitation (Hedges' g = -0.65), affective symptom (Hedges' g = -0.70), psychosis (Hedges' g = -0.72), and melancholic behavior (Hedges' g = -0.91) subscales. Additionally, light therapy also improved cognition (Hedges' g = 0.39)., Conclusion: Light therapy could be used as a supportive therapy to improve sleep, depression, cognition, and neuropsychiatric behaviors among PLWD., Competing Interests: DISCLOSURES The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, or publication of this article., (Copyright © 2023 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ageing process and abnormal protein accumulation in dementia damage neural pathways affecting the swallowing process and leading to swallowing disorder., Objective: To estimate the prevalence of swallowing disorder among older adults with different dementia subtypes., Methods: We conducted a systematic search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and OVID Medline. The meta-analysis employed R (version 4.0.2) and utilised a generalised linear mixed model with a random-effect approach to estimate the pooled prevalence of swallowing disorder among older adults, considering various dementia subtypes. The quality of included studies was assessed using Hoy's criteria. Heterogeneity was identified through Cochrane's Q and I2 statistics. To further explore heterogeneity, moderator analysis was performed to identify the contributing variables among the included studies., Results: Eighteen studies with 12,532 older adults with different dementia subtypes were enrolled in our meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of swallowing disorder among older adults with dementia was 58%, with 46.5% for Alzheimer's dementia, 34.9% for Parkinson's dementia, 18.8% for vascular dementia, 16.3% for mixed dementia and 12.2% for Lewy body dementia. According to assessment tools, Alzheimer's dementia had the highest prevalence, with 58% in instrumental assessments and 39% in clinical assessments. Medical history, Alzheimer's dementia, moderate-to-severe Clinical Dementia Rating, delayed oral phase, delayed pharyngeal phase and poor tongue motility contributed to the heterogeneity of the included studies., Conclusions: More than half of older adults with dementia demonstrate to have swallowing disorder. Our findings offer valuable insights to healthcare professionals for the identification of swallowing disorder in ageing population with dementia., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Cognitive function, working memory, attention, and coordination are higher-level functions sharing a complex relationship. Limited evidence exists on the effectiveness of multi-domain cognitive function interventions to improve cognitive outcomes. We evaluated the effectiveness of such interventions on cognitive function, working memory, attention, and coordination in older adults with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia., Methods: We conducted a double-blind, two-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial in community care centres of Northern Taiwan. We recruited 72 participants aged≥65 years and randomly allocated them using 1:1 block randomization (block size = 4) into experimental (multi-domain cognitive function training) (MCFT) and control groups (passive information activities) (PIA) (n = 36/group). We administered the interventions in both groups for 30 minutes per session, three sessions per week for eight weeks, for a total of 24 sessions. The outcome indicators were cognitive function assessed (mini-mental status examination), working memory (digit span), selective attention (Stroop test), visual-spatial attention (trail making test-A (TMT-A)), divided attention (trail making test-B (TMT-B)), and coordination (Berry visual-motor integration (Berry-VMI)). We evaluated the study outcomes at baseline, immediate post-test, one-month follow-up, and one-year follow-up., Results: We found no significant differences between the groups at baseline except for education. The average age of participants was 82.3 years, and most (76.4%) were female. We analysed the results by generalised estimating equations (GEE) based on the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. The multi-domain cognitive function training was effective in improving cognitive function (β = 1.7; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.63-2.31; P = 0.001), working memory (β = -1.45; 95% CI = -2.62, -0.27; P = 0.016), and selective attention (β = -23.3; 95% = CI -43.9, -2.76; P = 0.026) compared to passive information activities at 1-month follow-up. The effects of multi-domain cognitive function training on cognitive function (β = 1.51; 95% CI = 0.40-2.63; P = 0.008), working memory (β = -1.93; 95% CI -3.33, -0.54; P = 0.007), selective attention (β = -27.8; 95% CI = -47.1, -8.48; P = 0.005), and coordination (β = 1.61; 95% CI = 0.25, 2.96; P = 0.020) were maintained for one year. There were no significant improvements in attention outcomes (visual-spatial and divided attention) after training., Conclusions: MCFT intervention demonstrated favourable effects in improving global cognitive function, working memory, selective attention, and coordination among older adults with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia. Thus, applying multi-domain cognitive training in older adults with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia could help to delay the cognitive decline., Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000039306)., Competing Interests: Disclosure of interest: The authors completed the ICMJE Disclosure of Interest Form (available upon request from the corresponding author) and disclose no relevant interest., (Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved.)

Background: Attention is essential to daily life and cognitive functioning, and attention deficits can affect daily functional and social behaviour, such as falls, risky driving, and accidental injuries. However, attention function is important yet easily overlooked in older adults with mild cognitive impairment, and evidence is limited. We aimed to explore the pooled effect of cognitive training on domains of attention in older adults with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia using a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials., Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) up to 3 November 2022. We included participants aged ≥50 years diagnosed with cognitive impairment, with various cognitive training interventions as the intervention measures. The primary outcome was overall attention and the secondary outcomes were attention in different domains and global cognitive function. We calculated the Hedges' g and confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model to evaluate the effect size of the outcome measures and evaluated heterogeneity using the χ 2 test and I 2 value., Results: We included 17 RCTs and found that cognitive training interventions improve overall attention (Hedges' g = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.13, 0.70), selective attention (Hedges' g = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.19, 0.55), divided attention (Hedges' g = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.03, 0.72), and global cognitive function (Hedges' g = 0.30; 95% CI = 0.02, 0.58) in older adults with mild cognitive impairment, but with relatively low effectiveness., Conclusions: Cognitive training intervention can improve some attention functions in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Attention function training should also be incorporated into routine activities and long-term sustainability planning to delay the deterioration of attention function in older adults. Besides reducing their risk of abnormal events in daily life (such as falls), it can also improve their quality of life and help reduce the progression of cognitive impairment, achieving early detection of secondary prevention., Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42022385211)., Competing Interests: Disclosure of interest: The authors completed the ICMJE Disclosure of Interest Form (available upon request from the corresponding author) and disclose no relevant interests., (Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The condition of caregivers is important to the quality of care received by people with Parkinson's disease (PD), especially at the late disease stages. This study addresses the distress placed on caregivers by participants' neuropsychiatric symptoms at different stages of PD in Taiwan.Methods: This prospective study enrolled 108 people with PD. All participants were examined with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI), and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale. Caregiver distress was measured using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Caregiver Distress Scale (NPI-D). Statistical analysis was used to explore the PD-related factors that contribute to caregiver distress.Results: The mean follow-up interval in the 108 PD participants were 24.0 ± 10.2 months with no participant lost to follow-up due to death. NPI-distress (the sum of NPI caregiver distress scale across the 12 domains of the NPI) was positively correlated with NPI-sum (the total score across the 12 domains of the NPI) (r = 0.787, p < 0.001), CDR (r = 0.403, p < 0.001), UPRDS (r = 0.276, p = 0.004), and disease duration (r = 0.246, p = 0.002), but negatively correlated with CASI (r = -0.237, p = 0.043) and MMSE (r = -0.281, p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that only NPI-sum and disease duration were independently correlated with NPI-distress.Conclusion: The disease duration and NPI-sum are independent predictors of caregiver distress in Taiwanese populations with PD. Early detection and reduction of neuropsychiatric symptoms in people with PD can help decrease caregiver distress. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine the effects of simultaneous dual-task training on cognitive function, physical function, and depression in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Comprehensive database searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Ovid-Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus up to December 2022. Randomized controlled trials were included to assess the efficacy of simultaneous dual-task training for older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia. The analysis utilized Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 3.0, presenting Hedges' g and the corresponding 95 % confidence interval (CI) for the pooled effect size and, applying a random-effects model. The I 2 and Cochran's Q tests were employed to evaluate heterogeneity. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool was employed to assess study quality. The Copenhagen Trial Unit (version 0.9.5.10 Beta) was employed for trial sequential analysis, providing a rigorous methodology for evaluating cumulative evidence from multiple studies. Of the 1676 studies identified, 20 studies involving 1477 older adults with cognitive impairment were included. Dual-task training significantly enhanced global cognition (0.477, 95 % CI: 0.282 to 0.671), executive function (− 0.310, 95 % CI: − 0.586 to − 0.035), working memory (0.714, 95 % CI: 0.072 to 1.355), gait (0.418, 95 % CI: 0.252 to 0.583), physical activity (0.586, 95 % CI: 0.012 to 1.16), and depression (− 0.703, 95 % CI: − 1.253 to − 0.153). Trial sequential analyses revealed the robustness of this meta-analysis, which was based on a sufficient sample size from the included studies. Moreover, dual-task training demonstrated beneficial effects on global cognition, executive function, working memory, and gait. Dual-task training improved cognition, physical function, and depression among older adults with cognitive impairment. Accordingly, dual-task training should be considered a clinical nonpharmacological intervention for older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Nevertheless, the trial sequential analysis results were consistent with those of the pairwise meta-analysis but only global cognition reached significance by crossing the trial sequential analysis boundary. Future studies with higher-quality designs and larger sample sizes are required to obtain more conclusive results regarding other outcomes. PROSPERO CRD42023418598. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aging and dementia are common and closely related health problems in older adults, affecting their ability to maintain a healthy diet and ultimately resulting in malnutrition. In this study, we estimated the global prevalence of malnutrition and malnutrition risk in older adults with dementia. Meta-analysis. Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched for articles published from database inception to October 2022. Pooled prevalence analysis was conducted using a generalized linear mixed model and a random-effects model. I 2 and Cochran's Q statistics were used for identifying heterogeneity. Publication bias was evaluated using Peters' regression test and a funnel plot. Moderator analyses were conducted to investigate variations in the prevalence estimates of the included studies. All statistical analyses were conducted using R software. A total of 16 studies involving a total of 6513 older adults with dementia were included in the analysis. The results indicated that 32.52 % (95 % confidence interval: 19.55–45.49) of all included older adults with dementia had malnutrition, whereas 46.80 % (95 % confidence interval: 38.90–54.70) had a risk of malnutrition. The prevalence of malnutrition was found to be high among older patients living in institutionalized settings (46.59 %) and those with Alzheimer's disease (12.26 %). The factors moderating the prevalence of malnutrition included adequate vitamin B 12 consumption, risk behaviors, medical comorbidities, and certain neuropsychiatric symptoms. The prevalence of malnutrition risk was high among women (29.84 %) and patients with Alzheimer's disease (26.29 %). The factors moderating the prevalence of malnutrition risk included total cholesterol level, vitamin B 12 consumption, risk behaviors, medical comorbidities, and certain neuropsychiatric symptoms. Approximately one-third of older adults with dementia are malnourished and nearly half of older adults are at a risk of malnutrition. Encouraging collaboration among health-care professionals and ensuring early assessment and effective management of malnutrition are crucial for maintaining a favorable nutritional status in older adults with dementia. This study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42022369329). Globally, approximately 32.52 % of older adults with dementia are malnourished and approximately 46.80 % are at a risk of malnutrition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]