Search

Purpose: To determine the validity of intrapartum ultrasound (IPUS), and particularly the angle of progression (AOP), in predicting delivery mode when measured in real-life clinical practice among women with protracted second stages of labor. Methods: Using electronic medical records, nulliparous women with a second stage of labor of ≥ 3 h ("prolonged") and a documented AOP measurement during the second stage were identified. The ability of a single AOP measurement in "prolonged" second stage to predict a vaginal delivery (VD) was assessed. Fetal head descent, measured by AOP change/h (calculated from serial measurements), was compared between women who delivered vaginally and those who had a cesarean delivery (CD) for arrest of descent. Results: Of the 191 women who met the inclusion criteria, 62 (32.5%) delivered spontaneously, 96 (50.2%) had a vacuum extraction (VE) and 33 (17.3%) had a CD. The mean AOP was wider among women who had VD (spontaneous or VE) compared to those who had CD (153° ± 19 vs. 133° ± 17, p < 0.001). Wider AOPs were associated with higher rates of VD and an AOP ≥ 127° was associated with a VD rate of 88.6% (148/167). Among the 87 women who had more than one AOP measurement, the mean AOP change per hour was higher in the VD group than in the CD group (15.1° ± 11.4° vs. 6.2° ± 6.3°, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Ultrasound-assessed fetal head station in nulliparous women with a protracted second stage of labor can be an accurate and objective additive tool in predicting the mode and interval time to delivery in real-life clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective:: To compare maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with two methods to extract the impacted fetal head during Cesarean delivery. Study design:: We retrospectively analyzed cases with difficult extraction of the impacted fetal head during Cesarean section. We compared maternal and neonatal outcomes between cases that were delivered by head extraction following pushing through the vagina (‘push’ method) and those that were delivered by the reverse breech technique (‘pull’ method). Results:: We reviewed 3105 Cesarean section reports. Difficult extraction necessitating the ‘push’ or ‘pull’ methods was noted in 48 (1.5%) instances. Women that were delivered by the ‘pull’ method had significantly lower rate of postpartum fever (5% versus 46%; odds ratios, 0.06; 95% confidence intervals, 0.007–0.51) and extensions of the uterine incision (15% versus 50%; odds ratio, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04–0.74) compared to those that were delivered by the ‘push’ method. Neonatal outcomes were good in all cases. Conclusions:: In cases with difficult extraction of the impacted fetal head during Cesarean section, ‘pull’ method may result in lower maternal morbidity compared to the traditional ‘push’ method. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]