Search

Aims: The aim of this prospective multicentre study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of the new bidirectional rotational mechanical lead extraction (LE) sheath (Evolution RL, Cook Medical, USA) in chronically implanted leads (>1-year-old leads)., Methods and Results: Between September 2013 and June 2016, a total of 238 leads in 124 consecutive patients were removed by using the new Evolution RL rotational mechanical sheath. Indications for LE were cardiac device infection in 63 (50.8%) cases, lead malfunction in 41 (33.1%), upgrade in 1 (0.8%) case and for other reasons in the remaining 19 cases (15.3%). Ninety-one leads (38.2%) were implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads (81 dual coil vs. 10 single coil), 38 (16%) right ventricular leads, 86 (36.1%) right atrial leads, and 23 (9.7%) coronary sinus leads. The mean implant duration was 92.2 ± 52.9 months (range 12-336). 91.6% of the leads (218/238) were extracted completely with the Evolution RL alone, with the complete success rate rising to 98.7% (235/238 leads) with combined use of a snare. Overall clinical success rate was 100%. No Evolution sheath-related complications were noted. There were no deaths or major complications. Five minor complications (4%) were encountered. In cases of companion leads no wrapping or lead damage were observed., Conclusion: On the basis of our prospective multicentre study, the new hand-powered bidirectional rotational mechanical LE sheath is an effective and safe tool for the extraction of chronically implanted leads without major complications and lead wrapping or lead damage.

Background: Successful late potential (LP) abolition and postprocedural ventricular tachycardia (VT) noninducibility constitute significant end points after catheter ablation for VT. We investigated the prognostic impact of a combined procedural end point of VT noninducibility and LP abolition in a large series of post-myocardial infarction patients with VT., Methods and Results: A total of 160 (154 men, 94% with implantable cardioverter defibrillators) consecutive post-myocardial infarction patients undergoing first-time ablation procedures from 2010 to 2012 were included. Of the 159 patients surviving the procedure, 137 (86%) were either inducible or in VT at baseline and 103 (65%) had baseline LP presence, of which 79 (77%) underwent successful LP abolition. The combined end point was assessable in 155 (97%) patients. There were 50 (32%) patients with VT recurrences and 17 (11%) cardiac deaths during follow-up. Patients who fulfilled the combined end point of VT noninducibility and LP abolition compared with inducible patients exhibited a significantly lower incidence of VT recurrence (16.4% versus 47.4%; log-rank P<0.001) and cardiac death (4.1% versus 42.1%; log-rank P<0.001). Among noninducible patients, those with additional LP abolition also had a lower incidence of VT recurrence (16.4% versus 46.0%; log-rank P<0.001). After multivariate analysis, the combined end point of VT noninducibility and LP abolition (hazard ratio, 0.205, P<0.001) was independently associated with VT recurrence and cardiac death (hazard ratio, 0.106; P=0.001)., Conclusions: Achieving a combined catheter ablation procedural end point of VT noninducibility and LP abolition reduces VT recurrence rates to low levels (16%). The overall strategy was associated with a significant impact on cardiac survival., (© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Aim: The evolution mechanical dilator sheath has been reported to be an effective tool for chronic lead extraction (LE). We examined safety and efficacy of evolution system as compared with laser system., Methods and Results: From 2005 to 2009, all extractions requiring the use of a powered sheath were performed using the excimer laser system (n = 73). Since 2009, laser system was no longer available and the evolution system was introduced as the first-line method for powered extraction (n = 48). All procedures were performed by a single first operator. Success and complications were defined according to the current guidelines. Patients of the evolution group compared with those of the laser group had a greater number of extracted leads per patient (2.77 vs. 2.4, P = 0.049) and a longer implant duration (101.1 vs. 62.4 months, P = 0.001). Additional use of snare was required in 27.1% of the evolution group and 8.2% of the laser group (P = 0.005). Complete procedural success was achieved in 91.7% of the evolution group and 97.3% of the laser group (P = 0.16). There was also no difference between evolution and laser groups in clinical success (97.9 vs. 98.6%, P = 0.76), as well as regarding major (4.2 vs. 2.7%, P = 0.66) or minor complications (4.2 vs. 5.5%, P = 0.76)., Conclusion: Use of the recently introduced evolution system for LE exhibit acceptably high levels of safety, as well as of procedural and clinical success, although additional use of snare was required more frequently in the evolution compared with the laser group.