Search

Fecobionics is an integrated device that has shown promise for assessment of anorectal function. We used a wireless Fecobionics prototype to visualize defecatory patterns and to compute volume-pressure, contraction work, and flow. Twelve normal subjects were studied. The probe was 10 cm-long and contained pressure sensors and electrodes for impedance planimetry. Pressures, diameters, and volume data during defecation were analyzed. The bag was distended inside rectum to the urge-to-defecate level where after the subjects were asked to evacuate. The contraction work and defecatory flow were computed from the volume changes during expulsion. The minimum anal diameter during the evacuation was 17.6 ± 1.5 mm. The middle diameter recording was 10-20% lower than the front diameter channels and 10-20% bigger than the rear channels. The bag volume at urge correlated with the minimum diameter (r = 0.63). The diameter-pressure and volume-pressure loops were counterclockwise with phases of bag filling, isometric contraction, ejection and anal passage. The defecatory contraction work was 3520 ± 480 mL × cmH 2 O. The maximum flow during defecation was 302 ± 33 mL/s. The flow was associated with the anal diameter (r = 0.84) but not with the rectoanal pressure gradient (r = 0.14). Volume-pressure loops have a tremendous impact on the understanding of cardiopulmonary pathophysiology. Future studies will shed light on potential clinical impact in defecatory pathophysiology., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Several technologies have been developed for assessing anorectal function including the act of defecation. We used a new prototype of the Fecobionics technology, a multi-sensor simulated feces, to visualize defecatory patterns and introduced new metrics for anorectal physiology assessment in normal subjects. Fourteen subjects with normal fecal incontinence and constipation questionnaire scores were studied. The 10-cm-long Fecobionics device provided measurements of axial pressures, orientation, bending, and shape. The Fecobionics bag was distended to the urge-to-defecate level inside rectum where after the subjects were asked to evacuate. Physiological evacuation parameters were assessed. Special attention was paid to the Fecobionics rectoanal pressure gradient (F-RAPG) during evacuation. Anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET) were done as references. The user interface displayed the fine coordination between pressures, orientation, bending angle, and shape. The pressures showed that Fecobionics was expelled in 11.5 s (quartiles 7.5 and 18.8s), which was shorter than the subjectively reported expulsion time of the BET balloon. Six subjects did not expel the BET balloon within 2 min. The F-RAPG was 101 (79-131) cmH 2 O, whereas the ARM-RAPG was -28 (-5 to -47) cmH 2 0 (p < 0.001). There was no association between the two RAPGs (r 2  = 0.19). Fecobionics showed paradoxical contractions in one subject (7%) compared to 12 subjects with ARM (86%). Fecobionics obtained novel physiological data. Defecatory patterns and data are reported and can be used to guide larger-scale studies in normal subjects and patients with defecatory disorders. In accordance with other studies, this Fecobionics study questions the value of the ARM-RAPG., (© 2022 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society.)

Introduction: Defecatory disorders including obstructed defecation (OD) are currently diagnosed using specialized investigations including anorectal manometry and the balloon expulsion test. Recently, we developed a simulated stool named Fecobionics that provides a novel type of pressure measurements and analysis. The aim was to study OD phenotypes compared with slow transit constipation (STC) patients and normal subjects (NS)., Methods: Fecobionics expulsion parameters were assessed in an interventional study design. The Fecobionics device contained pressure sensors at the front, rear, and inside a bag. All constipation patients had colon transit study, defecography, anorectal manometry, and balloon expulsion test performed. The Fecobionics bag was distended in the rectum until desire-to-defecate in 26 OD compared with 8 STC patients and 10 NS. Rear-front pressures (preload-afterload parameters) and defecation indices (DIs) were compared between groups., Results: The Wexner constipation scoring system score was 13.8 ± 0.9 and 14.6 ± 1.5 in the OD and STC patients (P > 0.5). The median desire-to-defecate volume was 80 (quartiles 56-80), 60 (54-80), and 45 (23-60) mL in OD, STC, and NS, respectively (P < 0.01). The median expulsion duration was 37 (quartiles 15-120), 6 (3-11), and 11 (8-11) seconds for the 3 groups (P < 0.03). Fecobionics rear-front pressure diagrams demonstrated clockwise loops with distinct phenotype differences between OD and the other groups. Most DIs differed between OD and the other groups, especially those based on the anal afterload reflecting the nature of OD constipation. Several OD subtypes were identified., Discussion: Fecobionics obtained novel pressure phenotypes in OD patients. DIs showed pronounced differences between groups. Larger studies are needed on OD subtyping., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Introduction: Defecation is a complex process that can be easily disturbed. Defecatory disorders may be diagnosed using specialized investigation, including anorectal manometry (ARM) and the balloon expulsion test (BET). Recently, we developed a simulated stool named Fecobionics that integrates several tests and assesses pressures, orientation, and bending during evacuation. The aim was to evaluate the feasibility and performance of Fecobionics for assessing defecatory physiology in normal subjects., Methods: Physiological expulsion parameters were assessed in an interventional study design. The 10-cm-long Fecobionics probe contained pressure sensors at the front and rear and inside a bag and 2 motion processor units. The bag was distended in the rectum of 20 presumed normal subjects (15 female/5 male) until urge to defecate. ARM-BET was also performed. Three subjects used +2 minutes to evacuate BET, and 1 subject had a high fecal incontinence score. Therefore, the normal group consisted of 16 subjects (13 female/3 male aged 25-78 years)., Results: All subjects reported that Fecobionics evacuation was similar to normal defecation. Fecobionics expulsion pressure signatures demonstrated 5 phases, reflecting rectal pressure, anal relaxation, and anal passage. Preload-afterload loop diagrams demonstrated clockwise contraction cycles. The expulsion duration for BET and Fecobionics was 16 ± 2 and 23 ± 5 seconds (P > 0.2), respectively. The duration of the Fecobionics and BET expulsions was associated (P < 0.001). The change in bending of Fecobionics during defecation was 40 ± 3°., Discussion: Fecobionics obtained reliable data under physiological conditions. Agreement was found for comparable variables between ARM-BET and Fecobionics but not for other variables. The study suggests that Fecobionics is safe and effective in evaluation of key defecatory parameters.

During defecation, solid, semisolid or liquid stools are eliminated via the anus in a complex physiological process. Up to 25% of the population are affected by anorectal disorders that are poorly recognized and treated. We developed a new bionics device, a simulated stool named Fecobionics, to replace several current tests of anorectal function. Fecobionics was developed to simulate the defecation process that depends on rectal forces, the anorectal size angle, and anorectal size and sensitivity. Fecobionics provided axial pressure signatures, measurement of bending (anorectal angle) and geometric mapping in a single examination. It had the consistency and shape of normal stool. The device had a soft core with embedded electronics and a bag for distension. The paper describes the device development and validation. Furthermore, data were obtained in preliminary experiments in pigs, healthy human subjects and patients with focus on four important features of the system, i.e. measurements of pressure signatures, bending characteristics, impedance measurements and data transmission. Accurate pressure and orientation data as well as geometric profiles were successfully obtained on the bench as well as in vivo in pigs and human subjects during defecation. Fecobionics is a novel technology imitating defecation. The clinical future ultimately depends on its ability to impact on daily treatment of anorectal disorders. A potential long-term clinical application is use of the device for biofeedback training for dyssynergic defecation.

Background: Opioid analgesics inhibit anal sphincter function and contribute to opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD). However, it is unknown whether the inhibition can be reduced by opioid antagonism with prolonged-release (PR) naloxone and how this compares to laxative treatment., Aims: To compare the effects of combined PR oxycodone/naloxone or PR oxycodone plus macrogol 3350 on anal sphincter function and gastrointestinal symptoms., Methods: A randomized, double-blind, crossover trial was conducted in 20 healthy men. Participants were treated for 5 days with combined PR oxycodone/naloxone or PR oxycodone plus macrogol 3350. Resting anal pressure, anal canal distensibility, and relaxation of the internal sphincter to rectal distension were evaluated before treatment (baseline) and on day 5. The Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptom (PAC-SYM) questionnaire, stool frequency, and stool consistency were assessed daily., Results: Both PR oxycodone/naloxone and PR oxycodone plus macrogol treatment decreased sphincter relaxation compared to baseline (- 27.5%; P < 0.001 and - 14.7%; P = 0.01). However, sphincter relaxation was increased after PR naloxone/oxycodone treatment compared to macrogol (difference = + 17.6%; P < 0.001). Resting anal pressure and anal canal distensibility did not differ between treatments. PAC-SYM abdominal symptoms score was lower during PR naloxone compared to macrogol (0.2 vs. 3.2; P = 0.002). The number of bowel movements was lower during PR naloxone versus macrogol (4.2 vs. 5.4; P = 0.035)., Conclusion: Relaxation of the internal anal sphincter was significantly better after PR oxycodone/naloxone treatment compared to PR oxycodone plus macrogol 3350. These findings highlight that OIBD may require specific therapy against the complex, pan-intestinal effects of opioids.

Background/Aims: It is a common belief that constipated patients have hard feces that contributes to the difficulties defecating. To the best of our knowledge, no studies had been published on controlled evacuation of simulated feces with different consistencies. Methods: Twelve normal subjects were recruited for studies with the simulated feces device "Fecobionics" of different consistency (silicone shore 0A-40A corresponding to Bristol stool form scale types 2-4). The subjects filled out questionnaires and had the balloon expulsion test and anorectal manometry done for reference. The Fecobionics probes were inserted in rectum in random order with +20 minutes between insertions. The bag was filled to urge-to-defecate and evacuations took place in privacy. Non-parametric statistics with median and quartiles are provided. Results: One subject was excluded due to technical issues, and another had abnormal anorectal manometry-balloon expulsion test. The 4 females/6 males subjects were aged 23 (range 20-48) years. Most differences were observed between the 0A and 10A probe (duration, maximum bag pressure, duration x maximum bag pressure, and relaxation of the front pressure and the bend angle during evacuation), eg, the duration was 9 (8-12) seconds at 0A and 18 (12-21) seconds at 10A (P < 0.05), and maximum bag pressure was 107 (96-116) cmH2O at 0A and 140 (117-162) cmH2O at 10A (P < 0.05). The bend angle before evacuation differed between the probes whereas only the 10A differed from 40A during defecation. The 10A was harder to evacuate than the 0A probe. Except for the bend angles, no further significant change was observed from 10A to 40A. Conclusion: Fecal consistency affects defecatory parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Contractile patterns in rectum, puborectalis muscle and anal sphincter must be studied to understand defecation. Six subjects had contractile waveforms studied with Fecobionics. Symptom questionnaires, balloon expulsion test and anorectal manometry were done for reference. The Fecobionics bag was filled in rectum to urge-to-defecate volume and measurements were done for 4 h before the subjects attempted to evacuate the device. Pressures and bend angle (BA) variations were analyzed with Fast Fourier Transformation. Four normal subjects exhibited low frequency waves (< 0.06 Hz) for pressures and BA. The waves were uncoordinated between recordings, except for rear and bag pressures. Peak wave amplitudes occurred at 0.02–0.04 Hz. Pressures and the BA differed for peak 1 (p < 0.001) and peak 2 amplitudes (p < 0.005). The front pressure amplitude was bigger than the others (rear and BA, p < 0.05; bag, p < 0.005) for peak 1, and bigger than bag pressure (p < 0.005) and BA (p < 0.05) for peak 2. One subject was considered constipated with lower front pressure amplitudes compared to normal subjects and increased amplitudes for other parameters. The sixth subject was hyperreactive and differed from the other subjects. In conclusion, the rectum, anal sphincter and puborectalis muscle showed different contraction waves during prolonged measurements. The data call for larger studies to better understand normal defecation, feces-withholding patterns, and the implications on anorectal disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Defecatory disorders including fecal incontinence (FI) are diagnosed on the symptom pattern supplemented by anorectal manometry (ARM), the balloon expulsion test (BET), and endo-anal ultrasonography. In this study, we used a simulated stool named Fecobionics to study distinct defecation patterns in FI patients using preload-afterload diagrams and to provide comparative data on defecation indices (DIs) between passive and urge incontinent patients. All subjects had Fecobionics, endo-anal ultrasonography and ARM-BET done. The Fecobionics bag was distended in rectum until urge in 37 female patients (64.1 ± 1.5 yrs) and a group of normal subjects (NS, 12F, age 64.8 ± 2.8 yrs). Rear-front pressure (preload-afterload) diagrams and DIs were compared between groups. The FISI score in the patients was 8.6 ± 0.6. The NS did not report FI-related symptoms. All patients and NS defecated Fecobionics and ARM-BET within 2 min. The urge volume was 46.1 ± 3.6 and 35.3 ± 5.9 mL in the FI and normal groups (P > 0.1). The expulsion duration was 14.8 ± 2.4 and 19.8 ± 5.1 s for the two groups (P > 0.1). The preload-afterload diagrams demonstrated clockwise loops that clearly differed between the FI subtypes and NS. The DIs showed profound difference between patients and NS. Fecobionics data showed higher correlation with symptoms in FI patients than ARM-BET. Fecobionics obtained novel pressure signatures in subtypes of FI patients and NS. Fecobionics provides DI data that cannot be obtained with ARM-BET. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Most patients who have undergone low anterior resection suffer from bowel dysfunction postoperatively. This condition is referred to as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). The aim was to study defecatory patterns in LARS patients compared to a primary control group of fecal incontinence (FI) patients and normal subjects (NS) with the Fecobionics device. Methods: Fecobionics expulsion parameters were assessed in an interventional study design. The Fecobionics probe contained pressure sensors at the front, rear, and inside the bag. The bag was distended until urge sensation in rectum in 11 LARS patients (5F/6M, 63.2 ± 2.9 years), 11 FI subjects (7F/4M, 64.4 ± 2.5 years), and 11 NS (7F/4M, 63.6 ± 3.0 years). Defecation indices were computed from the Fecobionics data. All subjects had high‐resolution anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET) done. Symptoms were evaluated with LARS and Wexner scores. Key Results: The LARS score in the LARS patients was 39.0 ± 0.6. The Wexner score in the LARS, FI, and NS groups was 14.2 ± 0.7, 10.1±1.0, and 0.0 ± 0.0 (p < 0.01). The resting anal pressure and squeeze pressure were lowest in LARS patients (p < 0.05). The urge volume was 11.8 ± 4.2, 59.6 ± 6.4, and 41.6 ± 6.4 ml in the LARS, FI, and NS groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The expulsion duration did not differ between groups. Defecation indices were lowest in the LARS patients (p < 0.05). ARM‐BET confirmed the low urge volume in LARS patients whereas anal pressures did not differ between groups. Conclusions and Inferences: The LARS patients had low anal pressures and urge volume. Most Defecation Indices differed between the LARS group and the other groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Defecation is a complex process that is difficult to study and analyze. Here, we present new analytical tools to calculate frictional force and tension during expulsion of the Fecobionics simulated stool in human subjects. The 12-cm-long Fecobionics device contained pressure sensors, motion processor units for measurement of orientation and bending, and impedance rings for measurement of cross-sectional areas. Eight normal subjects defecated Fecobionics. The bending angle of the device, frictional force between the device and the surrounding tissue, and the stretch tensions were calculated. The bending angle and pressures changed during expulsion with the maximum pressure recorded at the rear. The averaged circumferential tension, longitudinal tension and friction force in each subject were associated with the front-rear pressure difference (r > 0.7, p < 0.005). The peak circumferential tension, longitudinal tension, and friction force immediately before expulsion of the rear were significantly higher compared to when the front entered the anal canal (F = 164.7, p < 0.005; F = 152.1, p < 0.005; F = 71.4, p < 0.005; respectively.). This study shows that Fecobionics obtained reliable data under physiological conditions. Mechanical features such as frictional force and stretch tensions were assessable during Fecobionics expulsion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]