1. A comparison of prediction and forecasting artificial intelligence models to estimate the future energy demand in a district heating system.
- Author
-
Runge, Jason and Saloux, Etienne
- Subjects
- *
DEMAND forecasting , *ARTIFICIAL intelligence , *ENERGY consumption , *GREENHOUSE gas mitigation , *MACHINE learning , *HEATING - Abstract
Forecasting the short-term future energy demand in buildings and districts is a vital component towards the optimization of energy use and consequently the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. This paper explores artificial intelligence approaches applied to estimate the future heating load in a district heating system. A distinction is made within thisd work between a prediction and forecasting based approach; a comparison is then accomplished by applying each method with prominent Machine Learning and Deep Learning based algorithms to estimate the future heating demand over 6 h and 24 h ahead. This analysis used available data from a Canadian district heating system in Quebec and actual weather forecasts obtained from Canadian meteorological services. All models within this work applied a grid search in order to calibrate their respective hyperparameters. Results of this work indicated that the prediction-based approach (with forecasted inputs) obtained a higher accuracy than the forecasting approach. All the machine learning models obtained good accuracy with errors not exceeding 16% CV(RMSE) and closer to 10% CV(RMSE) for the top performing models. Furthermore, the LSTM and XGBoost were consistently among the top performing algorithms and provided good performance over a variety of hyperparameters. The biggest difference between the two algorithms was the computational times; it was observed that the XGBoost was significantly faster to train. • Artificial Intelligence models are investigated to forecast district heating demand. • Prediction and forecasting based approaches are compared. • Model performance is estimated using accuracy, training time and stability. • The prediction approach using forecasted inputs shows slightly better results. • LSTM and XGBoost models outperform other techniques with an error of 11%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF