Search

Objective: In the management of the aortic aneurysm, 4D flow magnetic resonance Imaging provides valuable information for the computation of new biomarkers using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). However, accurate segmentation of the aorta is required. Thus, our objective is to evaluate the performance of two automatic segmentation methods on the calculation of aortic wall pressure., Methods: Automatic segmentation of the aorta was performed with methods based on deep learning and multi-atlas using the systolic phase in the 4D flow MRI magnitude image of 36 patients. Using mesh morphing, isotopological meshes were generated, and CFD was performed to calculate the aortic wall pressure. Node-to-node comparisons of the pressure results were made to identify the most robust automatic method respect to the pressures obtained with a manually segmented model., Results: Deep learning approach presented the best segmentation performance with a mean Dice similarity coefficient and a mean Hausdorff distance (HD) equal to 0.92+/- 0.02 and 21.02+/- 24.20 mm, respectively. At the global level HD is affected by the performance in the abdominal aorta. Locally, this distance decreases to 9.41+/- 3.45 and 5.82+/- 6.23 for the ascending and descending thoracic aorta, respectively. Moreover, with respect to the pressures from the manual segmentations, the differences in the pressures computed from deep learning were lower than those computed from multi-atlas method., Conclusion: To reduce biases in the calculation of aortic wall pressure, accurate segmentation is needed, particularly in regions with high blood flow velocities. Thus, the deep learning segmen-tation method should be preferred., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology (ESMRMB).)

Background: 4D flow MRI allows the analysis of hemodynamic changes in the aorta caused by pathologies such as thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA). For personalized management of TAA, new biomarkers are required to analyze the effect of fluid structure iteration which can be obtained from 4D flow MRI. However, the generation of these biomarkers requires prior 4D segmentation of the aorta., Objective: To develop an automatic deep learning model to segment the aorta in 4D from 4D flow MRI., Methods: Segmentation is addressed with a U-Net based segmentation model that treats each 4D flow MRI frame as an independent sample. Performance is measured with respect to Dice score (DS) and Hausdorff distance (HD). In addition, the maximum and minimum surface areas at the level of the ascending aorta are measured and compared with those obtained from cine-MRI., Results: The segmentation performance was 0.90 ± 0.02 for the DS and the mean HD was 9.58 ± 4.36 mm. A correlation coefficient of r = 0.85 was obtained for the maximum surface and r = 0.86 for the minimum surface between the 4D flow MRI and cine-MRI., Conclusion: The proposed automatic approach of 4D aortic segmentation from 4D flow MRI seems to be accurate enough to contribute to the wider use of this imaging technique in the analysis of pathologies such as TAA., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In the management of the aortic aneurysm, 4D flow magnetic resonance Imaging provides valuable information for the computation of new biomarkers using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). However, accurate segmentation of the aorta is required. Thus, our objective is to evaluate the performance of two automatic segmentation methods on the calculation of aortic wall pressure. Methods: Automatic segmentation of the aorta was performed with methods based on deep learning and multi-atlas using the systolic phase in the 4D flow MRI magnitude image of 36 patients. Using mesh morphing, isotopological meshes were generated, and CFD was performed to calculate the aortic wall pressure. Node-to-node comparisons of the pressure results were made to identify the most robust automatic method respect to the pressures obtained with a manually segmented model. Results: Deep learning approach presented the best segmentation performance with a mean Dice similarity coefficient and a mean Hausdorff distance (HD) equal to 0.92+/− 0.02 and 21.02+/− 24.20 mm, respectively. At the global level HD is affected by the performance in the abdominal aorta. Locally, this distance decreases to 9.41+/− 3.45 and 5.82+/− 6.23 for the ascending and descending thoracic aorta, respectively. Moreover, with respect to the pressures from the manual segmentations, the differences in the pressures computed from deep learning were lower than those computed from multi-atlas method. Conclusion: To reduce biases in the calculation of aortic wall pressure, accurate segmentation is needed, particularly in regions with high blood flow velocities. Thus, the deep learning segmen-tation method should be preferred. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A thoracic aortic aneurysm is an abnormal dilatation of the aorta that can progress and lead to rupture. The decision to conduct surgery is made by considering the maximum diameter, but it is now well known that this metric alone is not completely reliable. The advent of 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging has allowed for the calculation of new biomarkers for the study of aortic diseases, such as wall shear stress. However, the calculation of these biomarkers requires the precise segmentation of the aorta during all phases of the cardiac cycle. The objective of this work was to compare two different methods for automatically segmenting the thoracic aorta in the systolic phase using 4D flow MRI. The first method is based on a level set framework and uses the velocity field in addition to 3D phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. The second method is a U-Net-like approach that is only applied to magnitude images from 4D flow MRI. The used dataset was composed of 36 exams from different patients, with ground truth data for the systolic phase of the cardiac cycle. The comparison was performed based on selected metrics, such as the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorf distance (HD), for the whole aorta and also three aortic regions. Wall shear stress was also assessed and the maximum wall shear stress values were used for comparison. The U-Net-based approach provided statistically better results for the 3D segmentation of the aorta, with a DSC of 0.92 ± 0.02 vs. 0.86 ± 0.5 and an HD of 21.49 ± 24.8 mm vs. 35.79 ± 31.33 mm for the whole aorta. The absolute difference between the wall shear stress and ground truth slightly favored the level set method, but not significantly (0.754 ± 1.07 Pa vs. 0.737 ± 0.79 Pa). The results showed that the deep learning-based method should be considered for the segmentation of all time steps in order to evaluate biomarkers based on 4D flow MRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ascending aortic aneurysm is a pathology that is important to be supervised and treated. During the years the aorta dilates, it becomes stiff, and its elastic properties decrease. In some cases, the aortic wall can rupture leading to aortic dissection with a high mortality rate. The main reference standard to measure when the patient needs to undertake surgery is the aortic diameter. However, the aortic diameter was shown not to be sufficient to predict aortic dissection, implying other characteristics should be considered. Therefore, the main objective of this work is to assess in-vivo the elastic properties of four different quadrants of the ascending aorta and compare the results with equivalent properties obtained ex-vivo. The database consists of 73 cine-MRI sequences of thoracic aorta acquired in axial orientation at the level of the pulmonary trunk. All the patients have dilated aorta and surgery is required. The exams were acquired just prior to surgery, each consisting of 30 slices on average across the cardiac cycle. Multiple deep learning architectures have been explored with different hyperparameters and settings to automatically segment the contour of the aorta on each image and then automatically calculate the aortic compliance. A semantic segmentation U-Net network outperforms the rest explored networks with a Dice score of 98.09% (±0.96%) and a Hausdorff distance of 4.88 mm (±1.70 mm). Local aortic compliance and local aortic wall strain were calculated from the segmented surfaces for each quadrant and then compared with elastic properties obtained ex-vivo. Good agreement was observed between Young's modulus and in-vivo strain. Our results suggest that the lateral and posterior quadrants are the stiffest. In contrast, the medial and anterior quadrants have the lowest aortic stiffness. The in-vivo stiffness tendency agrees with the values obtained ex-vivo. We can conclude that our automatic segmentation method is robust and compatible with clinical practice (thanks to a graphical user interface), while the in-vivo elastic properties are reliable and compatible with the ex-vivo ones. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]