Search

Introduction: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is an established treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) with motor complications; the contribution of sex in determining the outcome is still not understood., Methods: We included 107 patients (71 males) with PD consecutively implanted with STN-DBS at our center. We reviewed patient charts from our database and retrospectively collected demographical and clinical data at baseline and at three follow-up visits (1, 5 and 10 years)., Results: We found a long-lasting effect of DBS on motor complications, despite a progressive worsening of motor performances in the ON medication condition. Bradykinesia and non-dopaminergic features seem to be the major determinant of this progression. Conversely to males, females showed a trend towards worsening in bradykinesia already at 1-year follow-up and poorer scores in non-dopaminergic features at 10-year follow-up. Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose (LEDD) was significantly reduced after surgery compared to baseline values; however, while in males LEDD remained significantly lower than baseline even 10 years after surgery, in females LEDD returned at baseline values. Males showed a sustained effect on dyskinesias, but this benefit was less clear in females; the total electrical energy delivered was consistently lower in females compared to males. The profile of adverse events did not appear to be influenced by sex., Conclusion: Our data suggest that there are no major differences on the motor effect of STN-DBS between males and females. However, there may be some slight differences that should be specifically investigated in the future and that may influence therapeutic decisions in the chronic follow-up., (© 2021. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Objective: Bilateral globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation (GPi-DBS) is an established and effective therapy for primary refractory dystonia. However, the comparison of frameless vs. frame-based DBS surgery technique is still controversial. This retrospective study aims to compare the clinical outcome of two GPi-DBS surgical techniques for patients affected by primary generalized or multi-segmental dystonia. Methods: For lead's stereotaxic placement, 10 patients underwent frame-based surgery and the other 10 subjects DBS surgery with a frameless technique. Clinical features were evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 months after surgery by means of the Burke–Fahn–Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale. Results: Frame-based GPi-DBS and frameless stereotaxic group revealed a comparable clinical outcome with no surgical complications. Conclusions: Frameless technique is safe and well-tolerated by patients and showed similar effectiveness of the frame-based stereotaxic surgery during GPi-DBS for primary dystonia. Notably, it could be a valid alternative solution because of the great advantage in improving the patient's discomfort during awake surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]