Search

Background: Therapeutic intervention has recently been actively performed for metastatic spine tumor even though spinal cord paralysis is not clearly observed, but there has been no report in which the degree of spinal cord compression by tumor was taken into consideration for the paralysis-preventing effect of treatment. Thus, we investigated the neurological outcome after treatment of patients with spinal cord compression in a state of impending paralysis., Methods: A retrospective cohort study. The subjects were 88 patients with epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) scale 1b or severer compression with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) E spinal metastasis. The neurological outcome after the therapeutic intervention was investigated at regular intervals until death. The therapeutic intervention was posterior decompression and stabilization in 18 patients, stabilization without posterior decompression in 15, and radiotherapy in 55 patients (3 groups)., Results: The ASIA aggravation group was comprised of 15 patients, and the severity of paralysis was ASIA A in 3, B in 3, C in 6, and D in 3. Paralysis appeared in 16.7% in the posterior decompression and stabilization group, 13.3% in the posterior stabilization without decompression group, and 18.8% in the radiotherapy group. In the transverse view, the incidence was high in cases with advancement to the intervertebral foramen and circumferential-type advancement, and paralysis developed in more than 20% of ESCC 1c or severer cases. Factors influencing neurological aggravation were investigated, but there was no significant factor., Conclusion: In ESCC 1b or severer cases with ASIA E spinal metastasis, paralysis aggravated after therapeutic intervention in 16.7% in the posterior decompression and stabilization group, 13.3% in the stabilization without decompression group, and 16.7% in the radiotherapy group. There was no significant factor influencing the development of paralysis.

OBJECTIVE The range of decompression in posterior decompression and fixation for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the thoracic spine (T-OPLL) can be established using an index of spinal cord decompression based on the ossification-kyphosis angle (OKA) measured in the sagittal view on MRI. However, an appropriate OKA cannot be achieved in some cases, and posterior fixation is applied in cases with insufficient decompression. Moreover, it is unclear whether spinal cord decompression of the ventral side is essential for the treatment of OPLL. In this retrospective analysis, the efficacy of posterior decompression and fixation performed for T-OPLL was investigated after the range of posterior decompression had been set using the OKA. METHODS The MRI-based OKA is the angle from the superior margin at the cranial vertebral body of the decompression site and from the lower posterior margin at the caudal vertebral body of the decompression site to the prominence of the maximum OPLL. Posterior decompression and fixation were performed in 20 patients. The decompression range was set so that the OKA was ≤ 23° or the minimum if this value could not be achieved. Cases in which an OKA ≤ 23° could and could not be achieved were designated as groups U (13 patients) and O (7 patients), respectively. The mean patient ages were 50.5 and 62.1 years (p = 0.03) and the mean preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were 5.9 and 6.0 (p = 0.9) in groups U and O, respectively. The postoperative JOA score, rate of improvement of the JOA score, number of levels fused, number of decompression levels, presence of an echo-free space during surgery, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and perioperative complications were examined. RESULTS In groups U and O, the mean rates of improvement in the JOA score were 50.0% and 45.6% (p = 0.3), the numbers of levels fused were 6.7 and 6.4 (p = 0.8), the numbers of decompression levels were 5.9 and 7.4 (p = 0.3), an echo-free space was noted during surgery in 92.3% and 42.9% of cases (p = 0.03), the operative times were 292 and 238 minutes (p = 0.3), and the intraoperative blood losses were 422 and 649 ml (p = 0.7), and transient aggravation of paralysis occurred as a perioperative complication in 2 and 1 patient, respectively. CONCLUSIONS There was no significant difference with regard to the recovery rate of the JOA score between patients with (group U) and without (group O) sufficient spinal cord decompression. The first-line surgical procedure of posterior decompression and fixation with the range of posterior decompression set as an OKA ≤ 23° before surgery involves less risk of postoperative aggravation of paralysis and may result in a better outcome.

Background: Posterior decompression and stabilization plays significant roles in palliative surgery for metastatic spinal tumor. However, the indication for addition of posterior decompression have not been examined. The purpose of this study was to investigate a retrospective cohort of outcomes of metastatic spinal tumor treated with minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) with or without posterior decompression., Methods: The subjects were 40 patients who underwent MISt using percutaneous pedicle screws for metastatic spinal tumor, including 20 patients treated with stabilization alone (group A) and 20 patients with added posterior decompression (group B). We analyzed baseline characteristics, postoperative survival time, and perioperative factors such as neurological outcomes, Barthel Index, VAS, and rate of discharge to home., Results: The mean ages were 70 and 66 years old (P = 0.06), the mean revised Tokuhashi scores were 7.2 and 5.8 (P = 0.1), the mean spinal instability neoplastic scores (SINS) were 10.5 and 9.0 (P = 0.04), and the mean Barthel Index for ADL were 65.5 and 41.0 (P = 0.06) in groups A and B, respectively. The median postoperative survival time did not differ significantly between groups A and B (12.0 vs. 6.0 months, P = 0.09). Patients in group A had a significantly shorter operation time (166 vs. 232 min, P = 0.004) and lower intraoperative blood loss (120 vs. 478 mL, P < 0.001). Postoperative paralysis (P = 0.1), paralysis improvement rate (P = 0.09), postoperative Barthel Index (P = 0.06), and postoperative VAS (P = 0.6) did not differ significantly between the groups. The modified Frankel classification improved from D1 or D2 before surgery to D3 or E after surgery in 4 of 10 cases (40%) in group A and 8 of 8 patients (100%) in group B (P = 0.01). Significantly more patients were discharged to home in group A (P = 0.02), whereas significantly more patients died in the hospital in group B (P = 0.02)., Conclusions: Patients treated without decompression had a shorter operation time, less blood loss, a higher rate of discharge to home, and lower in-hospital mortality, indicating a procedure with lower invasiveness. MISt without decompression is advantageous for patients with D3 or milder paralysis, but decompression is necessary for patients with D2 or severer paralysis.