Search

Objective: To evaluate the caregivers' opinions regarding decision-making in termination of pregnancy (TOP) for fetal anomaly., Material and Methods: Questionnaire survey using a semi-structured survey based on visual analogue scales, sent to all multidisciplinary centres for prenatal diagnosis in France. Answers were received from 26 centres nation-wide., Results: Response rate was 39% (213 responses received over 550 questionnaires sent). Fifty-five percent of respondents were women, 90% physicians, 7,5% midwives. A vast majority (69.8%) believes that their own convictions play a bigger role in decision in real practice than in their ideal. The major decisional factors in decision-making for TOP are: the long-term prognosis of the anomaly, a specialized opinion on its curability, the quality of the information given to the future parents, their expressed opinion, the existence of a multidisciplinary decision, the ability of the future parents to understand the medical data, the obtention of a medical consensus, the proof level of the medical information. For only 55% of the respondents, the current legal framework is adequate to manage the situations that result from prenatal diagnostic practices today. The question of late third-trimester TOP raises ethical debate: over a third (37%) see no ethical difference between TOP and withdrawal of care during the neonatal period; the majority (48% versus 43%) feel that ethically speaking a neonate and a foetus at 39 weeks gestational age (GA) should not be treated differently; 37% of the respondents feel that current practice is likely to lead to eugenism., Discussion and Conclusion: As far as TOP is concerned, the huge discrepancies in responses from the professionals highlight the ongoing ethical debate, especially concerning the concept of informed choice in TOP, which we believe should be entirely revisited., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The present investigation looks for a solution to the problem of the influence of feelings and emotions on our ethical decisions. This problem can be formulated in the following way. On the one hand, emotions (fear, pity and so on) can alter our sense of discrimination and lead us to make our wrong decisions. On the other hand, it is known that lack of sensitivity can alter our judgment and lead us to sacrifice basic ethical principles such as autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. Only emotions can turn a decision into an ethical one, but they can also turn it into an unreasonable one. To avoid this contradiction, suggest integrating emotions with the decisional factors of the process of "retrospective thinking". During this thinking, doctors usually try to identify the nature and impact of feelings on the decision they have just made. In this retrospective moment of analysis of the decision, doctors also question themselves on the feelings they did not experience. They do this to estimate the consequences of this lack of feeling on the way they behaved with the patient.