Search

Objective: To identify parents' priorities when making a decision on genetic testing and antiseizure drug (ASD) options for pediatric epilepsy and their support needs for informed decision-making in multi-ethnic Asian clinical settings., Methods: Qualitative in-depth interviews, using a semi-structured interview guide, were conducted with purposively selected parents of pediatric patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy or known diagnosis of epilepsy (n = 26). Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was undertaken to generate themes., Results: Parents' narratives showed difficulty assimilating information, while knowledge deficit and emotional vulnerability led parents' desire to defer a decision for testing and ASDs to mitigate decisional burden. Priorities for decisions were primarily based on intuitive ideas of the treatment's risks and benefits, yet very few could elaborate on tradeoffs between risks and efficacy. Priorities outside the purview of the healthcare team, such as children's emotional wellbeing and family burden of ASD administration, were also considered important. Authority-of-medical-professional heuristic facilitated the ASD decision for parents who preferred shared rather than sole responsibility for a decision. Importantly, parents' support needs for informed decision-making were very much related to the availability of support mechanisms in post-treatment decisions owing to perceived uncertainty of the chosen ASD., Conclusions: Findings suggest that multiple priorities influenced ASD decision process. To address support needs of parents for informed decision-making, more consideration should be given to post-treatment decision support through the provision of educational opportunities, building peer support networks, and developing a novel communication channel between healthcare providers and parents., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)