Search

Dealing with distributed data is one of the challenges for clustering, as most clustering techniques require the data to be centralized. One of them, k -means, has been elected as one of the most influential data mining algorithms for being simple, scalable, and easily modifiable to a variety of contexts and application domains. However, exact distributed versions of k -means are still sensitive to the selection of the initial cluster prototypes and require the number of clusters to be specified in advance. Additionally, preserving data privacy among repositories may be a complicating factor. In order to overcome k -means limitations, two different approaches were adopted in this paper: the first obtains a final model identical to the centralized version of the clustering algorithm and the second generates and selects clusters for each distributed data subset and combines them afterwards. It is also described how to apply the algorithms compared while preserving data privacy. The algorithms are compared experimentally from two perspectives: the theoretical one, through asymptotic complexity analyses, and the experimental one, through a comparative evaluation of results obtained from a collection of experiments and statistical tests. The results obtained indicate which algorithm is more suitable for each application scenario. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: One of the challenges for clustering resides in dealing with data distributed in separated repositories, because most clustering techniques require the data to be centralized. One of them, k-means, has been elected as one of the most influential data mining algorithms for being simple, scalable and easily modifiable to a variety of contexts and application domains. Although distributed versions of k-means have been proposed, the algorithm is still sensitive to the selection of the initial cluster prototypes and requires the number of clusters to be specified in advance. In this paper, we propose the use of evolutionary algorithms to overcome the k-means limitations and, at the same time, to deal with distributed data. Two different distribution approaches are adopted: the first obtains a final model identical to the centralized version of the clustering algorithm; the second generates and selects clusters for each distributed data subset and combines them afterwards. The algorithms are compared experimentally from two perspectives: the theoretical one, through asymptotic complexity analyses; and the experimental one, through a comparative evaluation of results obtained from a collection of experiments and statistical tests. The obtained results indicate which variant is more adequate for each application scenario. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: One of the top ten most influential data mining algorithms, k-means, is known for being simple and scalable. However, it is sensitive to initialization of prototypes and requires that the number of clusters be specified in advance. This paper shows that evolutionary techniques conceived to guide the application of k-means can be more computationally efficient than systematic (i.e., repetitive) approaches that try to get around the above-mentioned drawbacks by repeatedly running the algorithm from different configurations for the number of clusters and initial positions of prototypes. To do so, a modified version of a (k-means based) fast evolutionary algorithm for clustering is employed. Theoretical complexity analyses for the systematic and evolutionary algorithms under interest are provided. Computational experiments and statistical analyses of the results are presented for artificial and text mining data sets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The recent growing size of datasets requires scalability of data mining algorithms, such as clustering algorithms. The MapReduce programing model provides the scalability needed, alongside with portability as well as automatic data safety and management. k -means is one of the most popular algorithms in data mining and can be easily adapted to the MapReduce model. Nevertheless, k -means has drawbacks, such as the need to provide the number of clusters ( k ) in advance and the sensitivity of the algorithm to the initial cluster prototypes. This paper presents two evolutionary scalable metaheuristics in MapReduce that automatically seek the solution with the optimal number of clusters and best clustering structure for scalable datasets. The first consists in an algorithm able to iteratively enhance k -means clusterings through evolutionary operators designed to handle distributed data. The second consists in applying evolutionary k -means to cluster each distributed portion of a dataset in an independent way, combining the obtained results into an ensemble afterwards. The proposed techniques are compared asymptotically and experimentally with other state-of-the-art clustering algorithms also developed in MapReduce. The results are analyzed by statistical tests and show that the first proposed metaheuristic yielded results with the best quality, while the second achieved the best computing times. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]