Search

Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine and compare decision‐making preferences on end‐of‐life care for older people in Japan, the Hong Kong SAR and South Korea. Background: Cultural values and beliefs influence decision‐making on end‐of‐life care. Design: A cross‐sectional design was adopted. Methods: Community‐dwelling people aged ≥65 with additional requirements were recruited in 2016–2017 in the three regions. Their decision‐making preferences on end‐of‐life care were assessed using Pang et al.'s questionnaire. These preferences and their sociodemographic and personal experience variables were compared and analysed using univariate and multiple logistic regressions. The STROBE checklist was followed. Results: This study involved 415 participants. In all three regions, the most preferred decision maker and person with whom to discuss end‐of‐life care issues was a family member. Participants in the Hong Kong SAR were less likely to select a family member as their preferred decision maker than those in Japan (adjusted odds ratio = 0.129). Koreans were less likely to discuss end‐of‐life care issues with medical professionals than people in Japan (adjusted odds ratio = 0.278). More than 70% of the participants in each region indicated that they would not prefer to leave an advance directive to decide their end‐of‐life care. Conclusion: Older Asians prefer to make their own decisions after consulting others. Family members play an important role in helping older people plan their preferred end‐of‐life care arrangements, even acting as decision makers when older people become incapable of deciding for themselves. Relevance to clinical practice: Sufficient information should be provided to older people and their families for the older people to determine their preferred care. Helping families to understand and support the planned care and advance directives is a strategy for maximising family compliance with the care. Continuous efforts should be made to promote advance care planning and advance directives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aims to examine the frailty transition patterns of older adults recruited from both community and residential care settings within a 5‐year period, and to identify the physical and psychosocial factors associated with the transitions. Design: This study is a secondary data analysis of a longitudinal study for tracking the change of health status of older adults 60 years of age or older. Participants who had undergone at least two assessments during 2013–2017 were selected for analysis. Guided by the Gobben's Frailty Model, biopsychosocial predictors were comprehensively identified from the literature, and their relationship to frailty state transition was explored. Methods: We compared the baseline characteristics of participants at the frail, pre‐frail, and robust states (categorized using the Fried Frailty Index). A generalized estimating equation was used to identify factors associated with an improvement or a deterioration in frailty. The probability of transitions between frailty states was calculated. Findings: Among the 306 participants, 19% (n = 59) improved and 30% (n = 92) declined in frailty within the project period. Sleep difficulties (odds ratio [OR] = 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07–2.90; p =.027), better cognitive status (OR = 0.80–0.84; 95% CI: 0.66–0.98 and 0.73–2.73; p =.031 and.018), good nutritional status (OR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.59–0.91; p =.005), slow mobility (OR = 1.03–1.13; 95% CI: 1.00–1.05 and 1.03–1.25; p =.047 and.014), hearing impairment (OR = 2.83; 95% CI: 1.00–8.01; p =.05), better quality of health—physical domain (OR = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.92–0.99; p =.006), and better functional ability (OR = 0.85–0.97; 95% CI: 0.79–0.92 and 0.96–0.99; p <.001 and p =.003) were significant associated factors in the worsening group. More physical activity (OR = 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00–1.01 and 1.01–1.02; p =.026 and p <.001), hearing impairment (OR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.08–0.86; p =.028), and slow mobility (OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.87–1.00; p =.037) were significant associated factors in the improvement group. Conclusions: Frailty is a crucial global public health issue. This study provides evidence for nurses to holistically consider the associated factors and to design effective interventions to combat frailty in our ageing society. Clinical Relevance: Frailty is a transient state that can be reversed. Professional nurses working in both community and residential care settings should be able to identify older adults at risk and improve their health conditions appropriately. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]