1. Does a Brief Educational Session Produce Positive Change for Individuals Waiting for Tertiary Chronic Pain Services?
- Author
-
Burke, Anne L. J., Denson, Linley A., and Mathias, Jane L.
- Subjects
- *
CHI-squared test , *CHRONIC pain , *PATIENT education , *QUESTIONNAIRES , *RESEARCH funding , *STATISTICAL sampling , *SCALE analysis (Psychology) , *STATISTICS , *T-test (Statistics) , *DATA analysis , *EDUCATIONAL outcomes , *DATA analysis software , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *BRIEF Pain Inventory , *ONE-way analysis of variance - Abstract
Objectives. To examine: 1) whether a single brief pre-clinic educational session improved the wellbeing and quality of life of individuals entering the wait-list for a tertiary chronic pain (CP) service; and 2) the impact of waiting for services on these outcomes. Methods. Participants were 346 adults, with basic English skills and non-urgent triage codes, who were recruited on referral to a tertiary Australian metropolitan CP unit. Participants were randomized across two conditions: "treatment as usual" (normal wait-list) and "experimental" (normal wait-list plus a 3-hour CP educational session). The educational session encouraged self-management and life engagement despite pain. Multiple outcomes (pain acceptance, pain-related interference, psychological distress, health care utilization [frequency, types], quality of life, health knowledge/beliefs), as well as pain severity and symptom exaggeration, were assessed at intake and again at 2 weeks and 6 months post-educational session (or equivalent for the wait-list group). Results. Satisfaction with the educational session was moderate-to-high, but attendance was not associated with improved outcomes. At 2 weeks, all study participants reported significant improvements in pain acceptance (willingness, overall acceptance), health care utilization (frequency) and quality of life (physical), which were maintained/ enhanced at 6 months. Use of psychological and physical therapies increased significantly by 6 months. There was no functional deterioration while wait-listed. Conclusions. Attending a brief pre-clinic education session did not improve function. There was no deterioration in wait-listed participants who agreed to be involved in research and who completed study measures at 2 and 6 months, but referral was associated with short-term functional improvements. This is the first study to link positive change with referral to, rather than treatment by, a tertiary CP service. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF