1. The Relationship Between Cardiorespiratory and Accelerometer-Derived Measures in Trail Running and the Influence of Sensor Location.
- Author
-
Staunton, Craig A., Swarén, Mikael, Stöggl, Thomas, Born, Dennis-Peter, and Björklund, Glenn
- Subjects
ANALYSIS of variance ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,LONG-distance running ,CARDIOPULMONARY fitness ,ACCELEROMETERS ,WEARABLE technology ,FISHER exact test ,ACCELEROMETRY ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,REPEATED measures design ,DATA analysis software - Abstract
Purpose: To examine the relationship between cardiorespiratory and accelerometer-derived measures of exercise during trail running and determine the influence of accelerometer location. Methods: Eight trail runners (7 males and 1 female; age 26 [5] y; maximal oxygen consumption [ V ˙ O 2 ] 70 [6] mL·kg
−1 ·min−1 ) completed a 7-km trail run (elevation gain: 486 m), with concurrent measurements of V ˙ O 2 , heart rate, and accelerations recorded from 3 triaxial accelerometers attached at the upper spine, lower spine, and pelvis. External exercise intensity was quantified from the accelerometers using PlayerLoad™ per minute and accelerometry-derived average net force. External exercise volume was calculated using accumulated PlayerLoad and the product of average net force and duration (impulse). Internal intensity was calculated using heart rate and V ˙ O 2 -metrics; internal volume was calculated from total energy expenditure (work). All metrics were analyzed during both uphill (UH) and downhill (DH) sections of the trail run. Results:PlayerLoad and average net force were greater during DH compared with UH for all sensor locations (P ≤.004). For all accelerometer metrics, there was a sensor position × gradient interaction (F2,14 29.003; P <.001). The upper spine was lower compared with both pelvis (P ≤.003) and lower spine (P ≤.002) for all accelerometer metrics during both UH and DH running. Relationships between accelerometer and cardiorespiratory measures during UH running ranged from moderate negative to moderate positive (r = −.31 to.41). Relationships were stronger during DH running where there was a nearly perfect correlation between work and impulse (r =.91; P <.001). Conclusions: Simultaneous monitoring of cardiorespiratory and accelerometer-derived measures during trail running is suggested because of the disparity between internal and external intensities during changes in gradient. Sensor positioning close to the center of mass is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF