Search

At the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there was scarce data about clinical/functional conditions during hospitalization or after hospital discharge. Little was known about COVID-19 repercussions and how to do early mobilization in intensive care unit (ICU). Identify the time to the initiation of out-of-bed mobilization and the levels of mobility (sitting over the edge of the bed, sitting in a chair, standing, and ambulating) reached by critically ill patients with COVID-19 during hospitalization and the factors that could impact early mobilization. This was a retrospective observational study of patients with COVID-19 in the ICU. There were 157 surviving COVID-19 patients included in the study (median age: 61 years; median ICU length of stay: 12 days). The median time to initiate out-of-bed mobilization in the ICU was 6 days; between patients who received mechanical ventilation (MV) compared with those who did not, this time was 8 vs. 2.5 days (p <.001). Most patients who used MV were mobilized after extubation (79.6%). During ICU stays, 88.0% of all patients were mobilized out of bed, and 41.0% were able to ambulate either with assistance or independently. The time to initiate out-of-bed mobilization is associated with sedation time and MV time. Despite the pandemic scenario, patients were quickly mobilized out of bed, and most of the patients achieved higher mobility levels in the ICU and at hospital discharge. Sedation time and MV time were associated with delays in initiating mobilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim(s): To demonstrate how interoperable nursing care data can be used by nurses to create a more holistic understanding of the healthcare needs of multiple traumas patients with Impaired Physical Mobility. By proposing and validating linkages for the nursing diagnosis of Impaired Physical Mobility in multiple trauma patients by mapping to the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) and Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) equivalent terms using free‐text nursing documentation. Design: A descriptive cross‐sectional design, combining quantitative analysis of interoperable data sets and the Kappa's coefficient score with qualitative insights from cross‐mapping methodology and nursing professionals' consensus. Methods: Cross‐mapping methodology was conducted in a Brazilian Level 1 Trauma Center using de‐identified records of adult patients with a confirmed medical diagnosis of multiple traumas and Impaired Physical Mobility (a nursing diagnosis). The hospital nursing free‐text records were mapped to NANDA‐I, NIC, NOC and NNN linkages were identified. The data records were retrieved for admissions from September to October 2020 and involved medical and nursing records. Three expert nurses evaluated the cross‐mapping and linkage results using a 4‐point Likert‐type scale and Kappa's coefficient. Results: The de‐identified records of 44 patients were evaluated and then were mapped to three NOCs related to nurses care planning: (0001) Endurance; (0204) Immobility Consequences: Physiological, and (0208) Mobility and 13 interventions and 32 interrelated activities: (6486) Environmental Management: Safety; (0840) Positioning; (3200) Aspiration Precautions; (1400) Pain Management; (0940) Traction/Immobilization Care; (3540) Pressure Ulcer Prevention; (3584) Skincare: Topical Treatment; (1100) Nutrition Management; (3660) Wound Care; (1804) Self‐Care Assistance: Toileting; (1801) Self‐Care Assistance: Bathing/Hygiene; (4130) Fluid Monitoring; and (4200) Intravenous Therapy. The final version of the constructed NNN Linkages identified 37 NOCs and 41 NICs. Conclusion: These valid NNN linkages for patients with multiple traumas can serve as a valuable resource that enables nurses, who face multiple time constraints, to make informed decisions efficiently. This approach of using evidence‐based linkages like the one developed in this research holds high potential for improving patient's safety and outcomes. No Patient or Public Contribution: In this study, there was no direct involvement of patients, service users, caregivers or public members in the design, conduct, analysis and interpretation of data or preparation of the manuscript. The study focused solely on analysing existing de‐identified medical and nursing records to propose and validate linkages for nursing diagnoses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the effect of diadynamic currents administered prior to exercises on pain and disability in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Design: A randomized-controlled trial. Setting: Special Rehabilitation Services in Taboão da Serra. Participants: Patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis. Intervention: Participants were randomly allocated to Group I (diadynamic currents and exercises; n = 30, 60 knees) or Group II (exercises alone; n = 30, 60 knees) and were treated three times a week for 8 weeks. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measures were change in knee pain evaluated by visual analog scale and disability Index Score (Lequesne). Secondary outcomes included change in mobility (Timed Up and Go test), range of motion (goniometer), muscle strength (dynamometer), a composite score for pain and disability (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis questionnaire), and a drug diary to measure consumption of rescue pain medication (paracetamol). All measurements were collected at baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months from baseline (follow-up). Results: There were 60 participants with a mean (SD) age of 63.40 (8.20) years. Between-group differences in the follow-up (8 weeks and 6 months) were observed for pain at rest, pain during activities of daily living and disability. There was improvement in Group I that was maintained for the three variables 6 months after treatment. Mean difference for pain at rest was −3.08 points (95% confidence interval −4.13; −2.02), p < 0.01 with an effect size of 1.4; mean difference for pain during activities of daily living was −2.40 points (95% confidence interval −3.34; −1.45), p < 0.01 with an effect size of 1.24; and mean difference for disability was −4.08 points (95% confidence interval −5.89; −2.26), p < 0.01 with an effect size of 1.04. Conclusion: Patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis receiving 8 weeks of treatment with diadynamic currents as an adjunct to a program of exercises had significantly greater improvements in pain and disability than those receiving exercises alone. Beneficial effects were sustained for 6 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The study aimed to investigate whether peripheral and inspiratory muscle strength and architecture, functional capacity, functional mobility, fatigue, and health-related quality of life are predictors of the Post–COVID-19 Functional Status Scale score in patients with post–COVID-19 syndrome who were hospitalized. Design: A cross-sectional study included 69 patients (53.3 ± 13.2 yrs, 36 men) with post–COVID-19 syndrome. The following outcomes were assessed: peripheral (dynamometry) and inspiratory (manovacuometry) muscle strength, muscle architecture (ultrasound), functional capacity (six-minute walk test), functional mobility (Timed Up and Go), fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy), health-related quality of life (36-item Short-Form Health Survey), and functional status (Post–COVID-19 Functional Status scale). Results: Functional mobility (β = 0.573, P < 0.001), vastus intermedius echogenicity (β = −0.491, P = 0.001), length of stay (β = 0.349, P = 0.007), and female sex (β = 0.415, P = 0.003) influenced the Post– COVID-19 Functional Status Scale. Conclusions: Functional mobility, muscle quality of the vastus intermedius, length of stay, and female sex influence the Post–COVID-19 Functional Status Scale score in this population. It is noteworthy that functional mobility is an independent predictor of Post–COVID-19 Functional Status Scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired weakness (ICUAW) on the functional independence of patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) over 6 months after ICU discharge. Methods This was a prospective cohort study that included patients who were admitted to the ICU because of COVID-19 and who were monitored for 6 months after discharge from the ICU via telephone. Patients were evaluated at 3 times (30 days, 3 months, and 6 months after discharge from the ICU) for functional independence for personal care and mobility activities (Barthel Scale), independence for self-care (Katz Index), impact of COVID-19 on functional status (post–COVID-19 Functional Status Scale [PCFS]), and mobility level (ICU Mobility Scale). The existence of some degree of dependence was considered when the Barthel Scale score was <100 points, the Katz Index was ≥1, and the PCFS score was ≥1. A PCFS score of ≥3 indicated moderate or severe dependence. Patients with a Medical Research Council score of <48 at discharge from the ICU were diagnosed with ICUAW. Results Sixty-eight patients were included, with a mean age of 51 (SD = 13) years. The ICUAW rate at ICU discharge was 35%. In the evaluation with the PCFS, the values for the presence of any functional limitation at 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months after ICU discharge were 89.7%, 57.4%, and 38.2%, respectively. The rate of persistence of functional limitations after 6 months was higher in patients with ICUAW than in those without ICUAW (66.7% vs 22.8%; P  = .000); the same was true for moderate or severe limitations (20.8% vs 4.5%; P  = .035). Likewise, functional independence for personal care, mobility, and self-care activities was poorer in patients with ICUAW. Conclusions In patients surviving an ICU stay due to COVID-19, decreased functional independence persists even 6 months after discharge, and patients with ICUAW have worse outcomes. Impact Patients who survive ICU stays due to COVID-19 continue to have greater functional dependence even 6 months after ICU discharge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To investigate the feasibility, safety, and effects of dual task (DT) in a mixed physical exercise protocol on mobility under DT in stroke survivors. Twenty-six chronic mild-impaired stroke survivors (age 51.57 ± 12.55; men= 13, women= 13) were randomly assigned into Experimental Group participating in a 15-week mixed (aerobic and resistance exercises performing a cognitive DT condition simultaneously) physical exercise protocol (30 sessions, 2x/week, duration of 60–90 min), and Control Group engaged in the same protocol without DT. Feasibility and outcome measures were assessed before and after the intervention and in a 5-week follow-up. DT physical exercise protocol was viable and safe. This protocol also improved mobility and gait when performed under DT, which was not found in the control group. DT does not influence aerobic resistance, strength, and balance responsiveness. It does not present any improvement in cognition, self-efficacy for falls, and quality of life. The results indicate that mixed physical exercise under DT is feasible and safe for mild-impaired stroke survivors. Stroke survivors demonstrate more significant improvement in the mobility performance under DT when submitted to a DT mixed physical exercise protocol than the standard physical exercise intervention. Brazilian clinical trials registry (RBR-4mvzz6); WHO trial record (U1111-1198-7173) DT training can be prescribed by using clear and precise parameters for stroke survivors. Physical Exercise without DT requirements did not improve mobility performing and cognitive tasks simultaneously in stroke survivors. Clinicians are encouraged to incorporate DT requirements into the exercise routines to enhance mobility under DT to mild-moderate stroke survivors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: the purpose of this pre-feasibility study was to examine perceptions and experiences of a Sit-to-stand activity with urban Brazilian community-dwelling older people in their homes. Method: the exploration method was focused ethnography. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 20 older people. Five means of data generation were used, namely: socio-demographic surveys, participant observations, informal interviews, formal semi-structured interviews, and field notes. Data analysis was qualitative content analysis. Results: the experience of mobility-challenged older people with the Sit-to-stand activity was dependent on their mobility expectations involving many factors that worked together to influence their beliefs and attitudes towards the activity, preferences, behaviors, and cultural perceptions. The participants of this study seemed to find the activity enjoyable; however, the most noticeable shortcomings for their engagement in the Sit-to-stand activity emerged as gaps in their personal and intrapersonal needs. Conclusion: the recommendations generated from the study findings call for the design of implementation strategies for the Sit-to-stand intervention that are tailored to this particular population's needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

COPD fits the profile of disabling health conditions. This study aims to validate the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with COPD. 100 participants with COPD responded to the Brazilian 36-item version of the WHODAS 2.0, as well as the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Spirometric data was extracted from medical records. The internal consistency analysis showed coefficients for all WHODAS 2.0 domains with a strong correlation (0.70–0.85) except for Life activities, which had a moderate correlation (coefficient = 0.60). In the construct analysis, the coefficients for the WHODAS and SGRQ domains presented a consistent correlation among them, varying from 0.40 to 0.69. No correlation was evidenced among the WHODAS domains and the spirometric data, highlighting that linear measures fail when associated with the functioning of an individual with COPD. Discriminative analysis revealed a capacity for the WHODAS 2.0 to distinguish among COPD different levels of clinical impact obtained from CAT excluding the Getting along domain. The WHODAS 2.0 shows as a valid instrument that can sensibly assess functioning differences related to the clinical impact classification level in subjects with COPD. WHODAS 2.0 is a valid tool to assess functioning in subjects with COPD. WHODAS 2.0 is sensitive to functioning differences related to classification level and to clinical impact in individuals with COPD. As a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM), WHODAS 2.0 offers the opportunity to develop clinical patient-centered interventions, improving the health care. As a low-cost, easy-to-use tool, WHODAS can be a useful resource in the process of clinical assessment of patient functioning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Participation is defined as frequency (measured by attendance and/or variety or diversity of activities) and involvement (participation experience including engagement, motivation, persistence, social connection and affection) in all life situations, and is seen as an essential condition for the development of the child. Children with myelomeningocele have several functional limitations that can lead to restriction of participation. Improving these children's participation requires knowledge about what factors may influence a child's ability to participate in activities of their choice. To verify whether factors such as age, mobility performance, access to assistive technology equipment and the presence of environmental facilitators are associated with the frequency and involvement of young children with myelomeningocele participation at home, daycare/preschool and in the community. A cross-sectional observational study was carried out with children diagnosed with myelomeningocele, between 6 months and 5 years of age. The dependent variables were Frequency and involvement in participation at home, day care/preschool and in the community, as measured by The Young Children's Participation Environment Measure - YC-PEM. The independent variables were age and access to assistive technology equipment collected through interviews with parents and caregivers, mobility performance measured by the questionnaire: Pediatric Assessment of Disability Inventory – Computerized Adaptive Testing (PEDICAT), and environmental facilitators measured by YC-PEM. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22.0. To verify the associations between age, mobility performance, access to assistive technology equipment and the presence of environmental facilitators with the frequency and involvement of participation, Spearman's correlation was performed, with a significance level of 5%. Sixty-five children and their families (mean age 27.91 (±17.36) months) participated in the study. The presence of environmental facilitators at home increased the child's involvement at home (r=0.30, p=0.01). In the daycare/preschool setting, a significant positive association was found between age (r=0.50, p<0.0001; r=0.55, p<0.0001), mobility performance (r= 0.35, p=0.003; r=0.37, p=0.002) and the presence of environmental facilitators in daycare/preschool (r=0.95, p<0.0001; r=0.98, p <0.0001), with frequency and involvement, respectively. However, there was a negative association between having access to assistive technology equipment and attendance (r=-0.32, p=0.008) and participation involvement (r=-0.36, p=0.03) in daycare/preschool. In relation to the community environment, factors such as age (r=0.40, p=0.001), mobility performance (r=0.26, p=0.03), and the presence of environmental facilitators (r=0, 35, p=0.003) correlated positively with community engagement. Preliminary results indicated that the presence of environmental facilitators increases the participation involvement of children with myelomeningocele in all environments. Older and more mobile children are more involved in daycare/preschool and in the community. However, having access to assistive technology equipment that facilitates mobility worsens the frequency and involvement of participation in the daycare/preschool environment. These findings highlight the role of the environment for the participation of children with myelomeningocele in different contexts, pointing to the need for more facilitators and environmental changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale is the most used tool to quantify balance confidence, a psychological factor related to balance impairment among older adults. Objective: To investigate the validity and reliability of the original and short versions of the Brazilian Activities-specific Balance Confidence scales, to determine cutoff points for balance impairments and to identify the determinants of balance confidence of community-dwelling older adults. Methods: The validity of both versions of the scales was verified by correlating its results with postural balance, fear of falling and mobility (n = 105). Both scales were administered with a 30 min (interrater reliability, n = 158) and 1-week intervals (intrarater reliability, n = 105). Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the cutoff points, and linear regression was applied to identify the determinants of balance confidence. Results: The Brazilian versions of the scale correlated to postural balance, fear of falling and mobility (p <.05). Excellent interrater (α = 0.946, 95% CI: 0.902–0.976; α = 0.932, 95% CI: 0.918–0.960) and intrarater reliability (α = 0.946, 95% CI: 0.905–0.960; α = 0.952, 95% CI: 0.921–0.965) were found for the original and short versions. Values of ≤67% (sensitivity: 81%, specificity: 77.4%) and ≤44% (sensitivity: 87.5%, specificity: 82.1%) were observed to identify balance impairments for the original and short versions of the scale. Physical inactivity, fear of falling, imbalance sensation, and number of falls are the main determinants of balance confidence. Conclusion: Both scales are valid and reliable to assess balance confidence. Cutoff points to identify balance impairments were determined and some factors may act as possible predictors of balance confidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the prognostic capacity of the clinical indicators of a delayed surgical recovery nursing diagnosis throughout the hospital stay of patients having cardiac surgery. Design: A prospective cohort design was adopted. A sample of inpatients undergoing elective cardiac surgery was followed during the immediate preoperative period and hospitalization. This research was conducted in the southeast region of Brazil at a national reference institution that treats highly complex diseases and performs cardiac surgeries. Data were collected from July 2017 to July 2018. Methods: At the end of 1 year of data collection, 181 patients were followed in this study. The Kaplan‐Meier method was used to calculate the survival time related to delayed surgical recovery. In addition, an extended Cox model of time‐dependent covariates was adjusted to identify the clinical signs that influenced the change in the nursing diagnosis status. Results: A delayed surgical recovery nursing diagnosis was present in 23.2% of the sample studied. With an expected length of stay of 8 to 10 days, most new cases of delayed surgical recovery were observed on the 10th postoperative day, and the survival rate after this day was decreased until the 29th postoperative day, when the nursing diagnosis no longer appeared. Interrupted healing of the surgical area, loss of appetite, and atrial flutter were indicators related to an increased risk for delayed surgical recovery. Conclusions: Timely recognition of selected clinical indicators demonstrates a promising prognostic capacity for delayed surgical recovery. Clinical Relevance: Accurate identification of prognostic factors allows nurses to identify early signs of postoperative complications. Consequently, the professional can develop an individualized plan of care, aiming at the satisfactory clinical recovery of the patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Obesity in Brazil is increasing with 54% of the Brazilian population being overweight, of which 20% is obese. Obesity is a risk factor for non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular disease: the leading cause of mortality in Brazil. This study aims to identify the barriers and facilitators to weight loss as perceived by patients with a view to reducing the burden of obesity-related diseases on patients and healthcare services. Methods: Fifteen qualitative, semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted in the preventive medicine department in a private health clinic in Bauru, Southeast Brazil. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted. Results: The barriers and facilitators were classified into three themes: lifestyle, motivation and education. Barriers include cost of a healthy lifestyle, time management, personal safety, mobility, junk food advertising, sustaining weight loss, mental health, lack of support and health education. Facilitators include change in eating habits, sleep quality, cooperative food networks, access to the multidisciplinary team and expert patients as health educators. Conclusion: Expert patients should be utilized as an education method, as they increase motivation, promote the facilitators and provide realistic expectations of the weight loss process. Barriers such as junk food advertising and accessibility to treatment need to be addressed. Abbreviations: BMI: Body Mass Index; NCD: Non-Communicable Disease; SUS: Sistema Único de Saúde; WHO: World Health Organization [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]