1. Development, validation and implementation of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire to assess habitual vitamin D intake.
- Author
-
Kiely, M., Collins, A., Lucey, A. J., Andersen, R., Cashman, K. D., and Hennessy, Á.
- Subjects
ANTHROPOMETRY ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,STATISTICAL correlation ,DIETARY supplements ,DOSE-response relationship in biochemistry ,EXPERIMENTAL design ,INTERVIEWING ,LONGITUDINAL method ,RESEARCH methodology ,NUTRITIONAL assessment ,SCIENTIFIC observation ,PROBABILITY theory ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,REGRESSION analysis ,RESEARCH evaluation ,RESEARCH funding ,SEASONS ,STATISTICS ,T-test (Statistics) ,VITAMIN D ,DATA analysis ,MULTIPLE regression analysis ,EFFECT sizes (Statistics) ,RESEARCH methodology evaluation ,DATA analysis software ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics - Abstract
Background A well-designed, validated quantitative food frequency questionnaire ( FFQ) could offer an efficient and cost-effective method for assessing habitual vitamin D intake. The present study aimed to describe the development, validation and implementation of a vitamin D FFQ. Methods National food consumption survey data obtained from Irish adults (18-64 years) were used to identify foods that contribute 95% of vitamin D intake. A winter-based validation study was carried out for the resulting FFQ in 120 females, including 98 women [mean (SD) 65.0 (7.3) years] and 22 girls [12.2 (0.8) years], using a 14-day diet history ( DH) as a comparator. Serum 25( OH)D concentrations were analysed. Validity coefficients were calculated using the method of triads. Cross-classification and Bland-Altman analysis were also performed. Results Median (interquartile range) vitamin D intakes (including the contribution from nutritional supplements) were 5.4 (3.7) and 3.7 (5.9) μg day
−1 from the FFQ and DH, respectively and intakes of vitamin D from food sources were 3.6 (3.1) and 2.4 (2.2) μg day−1 . The FFQ and DH classified 86% and 87% of individuals into the same and adjacent thirds of wintertime serum 25( OH)D status, respectively. There was a strong association ( r = 0.71, P < 0.0001) and no significant systematic or proportional bias observed for the difference between estimates from the FFQ and DH. The validity coefficient for the FFQ was 0.92 (95% confidence interval = 0.80-0.97). Repeatability analysis ( n = 56) performed 6-12 months later showed no significant difference in estimates of vitamin D between administrations. Conclusions The data obtained in the present study indicate high validity and good reproducibility of a short, interviewer-administered FFQ for vitamin D. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF