Search

This study shows that Escherichia coli can be temporarily enriched in zooplankton in natural conditions and that these bacteria can belong to different phylogroups and sequence types including environmental as well as clinical and animal isolates. We isolated 10 E. coli strains and sequenced the genomes of two of them. Phylogenetically the two isolates were closer to strains isolated from poultry meat than with freshwater E. coli, albeit their genomes were smaller than those from poultry. After isolation and fluorescent protein tagging of strains ED1 and ED157 we show that Daphnia sp. can take up these strains and release them alive again, thus forming a temporary host for E. coli. In a chemostat experiment we show that the association does not prolong the bacterial long-term survival, but that at low abundances it does also not significantly reduce the bacterial numbers. We demonstrate that E. coli does not belong to the core microbiota of Daphnia, suffers from competition by the natural microbiota of Daphnia, but can profit from its carapax to survive in water. All in all, this study suggests that the association of E. coli to Daphnia is only temporary but that the cells are viable therein and this might allow encounters with other bacteria for genetic exchange and potential genomic adaptations to the freshwater environment.ImportanceThe contamination of freshwaters with faecal derived bacteria is of major concern regarding drinking water acquisition and recreational activities. Ecological interactions promoting their persistence are still very scarcely studied. This study, which analyses the survival of E. coli in the presence of zooplankton, is thus of ecological as well as water safety relevance.

This study shows that Escherichia coli can be temporarily enriched in zooplankton under natural conditions and that these bacteria can belong to different phylogroups and sequence types (STs), including environmental, clinical, and animal isolates. We isolated 10 E. coli strains and sequenced the genomes of two of them. Phylogenetically, the two isolates were closer to strains isolated from poultry meat than to freshwater E. coli, albeit their genomes were smaller than those of the poultry isolates. After isolation and fluorescent protein tagging of strains ED1 and ED157, we show that