Search

Background: Glioblastoma is associated with a poor prognosis in the elderly. Survival has been shown to increase among patients 70 years of age or younger when temozolomide chemotherapy is added to standard radiotherapy (60 Gy over a period of 6 weeks). In elderly patients, more convenient shorter courses of radiotherapy are commonly used, but the benefit of adding temozolomide to a shorter course of radiotherapy is unknown., Methods: We conducted a trial involving patients 65 years of age or older with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either radiotherapy alone (40 Gy in 15 fractions) or radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide., Results: A total of 562 patients underwent randomization, 281 to each group. The median age was 73 years (range, 65 to 90). The median overall survival was longer with radiotherapy plus temozolomide than with radiotherapy alone (9.3 months vs. 7.6 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 0.80; P<0.001), as was the median progression-free survival (5.3 months vs. 3.9 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.60; P<0.001). Among 165 patients with methylated O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status, the median overall survival was 13.5 months with radiotherapy plus temozolomide and 7.7 months with radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio for death, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.73; P<0.001). Among 189 patients with unmethylated MGMT status, the median overall survival was 10.0 months with radiotherapy plus temozolomide and 7.9 months with radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio for death, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.01; P=0.055; P=0.08 for interaction). Quality of life was similar in the two trial groups., Conclusions: In elderly patients with glioblastoma, the addition of temozolomide to short-course radiotherapy resulted in longer survival than short-course radiotherapy alone. (Funded by the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00482677 .).

Background: Outcome of low-grade glioma (WHO grade II) is highly variable, reflecting molecular heterogeneity of the disease. We compared two different, single-modality treatment strategies of standard radiotherapy versus primary temozolomide chemotherapy in patients with low-grade glioma, and assessed progression-free survival outcomes and identified predictive molecular factors., Methods: For this randomised, open-label, phase 3 intergroup study (EORTC 22033-26033), undertaken in 78 clinical centres in 19 countries, we included patients aged 18 years or older who had a low-grade (WHO grade II) glioma (astrocytoma, oligoastrocytoma, or oligodendroglioma) with at least one high-risk feature (aged >40 years, progressive disease, tumour size >5 cm, tumour crossing the midline, or neurological symptoms), and without known HIV infection, chronic hepatitis B or C virus infection, or any condition that could interfere with oral drug administration. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either conformal radiotherapy (up to 50·4 Gy; 28 doses of 1·8 Gy once daily, 5 days per week for up to 6·5 weeks) or dose-dense oral temozolomide (75 mg/m 2 once daily for 21 days, repeated every 28 days [one cycle], for a maximum of 12 cycles). Random treatment allocation was done online by a minimisation technique with prospective stratification by institution, 1p deletion (absent vs present vs undetermined), contrast enhancement (yes vs no), age (<40 vs ≥40 years), and WHO performance status (0 vs ≥1). Patients, treating physicians, and researchers were aware of the assigned intervention. A planned analysis was done after 216 progression events occurred. Our primary clinical endpoint was progression-free survival, analysed by intention-to-treat; secondary outcomes were overall survival, adverse events, neurocognitive function (will be reported separately), health-related quality of life and neurological function (reported separately), and correlative analyses of progression-free survival by molecular markers (1p/19q co-deletion, MGMT promoter methylation status, and IDH1/IDH2 mutations). This trial is closed to accrual but continuing for follow-up, and is registered at the European Trials Registry, EudraCT 2004-002714-11, and at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00182819., Findings: Between Sept 23, 2005, and March 26, 2010, 707 patients were registered for the study. Between Dec 6, 2005, and Dec 21, 2012, we randomly assigned 477 patients to receive either radiotherapy (n=240) or temozolomide chemotherapy (n=237). At a median follow-up of 48 months (IQR 31-56), median progression-free survival was 39 months (95% CI 35-44) in the temozolomide group and 46 months (40-56) in the radiotherapy group (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1·16, 95% CI 0·9-1·5, p=0·22). Median overall survival has not been reached. Exploratory analyses in 318 molecularly-defined patients confirmed the significantly different prognosis for progression-free survival in the three recently defined molecular low-grade glioma subgroups (IDHmt, with or without 1p/19q co-deletion [IDHmt/codel], or IDH wild type [IDHwt]; p=0·013). Patients with IDHmt/non-codel tumours treated with radiotherapy had a longer progression-free survival than those treated with temozolomide (HR 1·86 [95% CI 1·21-2·87], log-rank p=0·0043), whereas there were no significant treatment-dependent differences in progression-free survival for patients with IDHmt/codel and IDHwt tumours. Grade 3-4 haematological adverse events occurred in 32 (14%) of 236 patients treated with temozolomide and in one (<1%) of 228 patients treated with radiotherapy, and grade 3-4 infections occurred in eight (3%) of 236 patients treated with temozolomide and in two (1%) of 228 patients treated with radiotherapy. Moderate to severe fatigue was recorded in eight (3%) patients in the radiotherapy group (grade 2) and 16 (7%) in the temozolomide group. 119 (25%) of all 477 patients had died at database lock. Four patients died due to treatment-related causes: two in the temozolomide group and two in the radiotherapy group., Interpretation: Overall, there was no significant difference in progression-free survival in patients with low-grade glioma when treated with either radiotherapy alone or temozolomide chemotherapy alone. Further data maturation is needed for overall survival analyses and evaluation of the full predictive effects of different molecular subtypes for future individualised treatment choices., Funding: Merck Sharpe & Dohme-Merck & Co, Canadian Cancer Society, Swiss Cancer League, UK National Institutes of Health, Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, US National Cancer Institute, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Cancer Research Fund., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: No standard chemotherapy regimen exists for primary CNS lymphoma, reflecting an absence of randomised studies. We prospectively tested two promising methotrexate-based regimens, one more intensive and a milder regimen, for primary CNS lymphoma in the elderly population, who account for most patients., Methods: In this open-label, randomised phase 2 trial, done in 13 French institutions, we enrolled immunocompetent patients who had neuroimaging and histologically confirmed newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma, were aged 60 years and older, and had a Karnofsky performance scale score of 40 or more. Participants were stratified by Karnofsky performance scale score (<60 vs ≥60) and treating institution and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive methotrexate (3·5 g/m(2)) with temozolomide (150 mg/m(2)) or methotrexate (3·5 g/m(2)), procarbazine (100 mg/m(2)), vincristine (1·4 mg/m(2)), and cytarabine (3 mg/m(2)). Neither regimen included radiotherapy; both included prophylactic G-CSF and corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival. Analysis was intent to treat, in a non-comparative phase 2 trial design. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00503594., Findings: Between July 16, 2007, and March 25, 2010, 98 patients were enrolled, of whom 95 were randomly assigned and analysed; 48 to methotrexate with temozolomide and 47 to methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine, and cytarabine. 1-year progression-free survival was 36% (95% CI 22-50) in the methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine, and cytarabine group and 36% (22-50) in the methotrexate with temozolomide group; median progression-free survival was 9·5 months (95% CI 5·3-13·8) versus 6·1 months (3·8-11·9), respectively. Objective responses were noted in 82% (95% CI 68-92) of patients in the methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine, and cytarabine group versus 71% (55-84) of patients in the methotrexate with temozolomide group. Median overall survival was 31 months (95% CI 12·2-35·8) in the methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine, and cytarabine group and 14 months (8·1-28·4) in the methotrexate with temozolomide group. No differences were noted in toxic effects between the two groups. The most common grades 3 and 4 toxicities in both groups were liver dysfunction (21 [4%] in the the methotrexate and temozolomide group and 18 [38%] in the methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine, and cytarabine group), lymphopenia (14 [29%] and 14 [30%]), and infection (six [13%] and seven [15%]). To date, 33 (69%) patients in the methotrexate and temozolomide group have died, versus 31 (55%) in the methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine and cytarabine group. Quality-of-life evaluation (QLQ-C30 and BN20) showed improvements in most domains (p=0·01-0·0001) compared with baseline in both groups. Prospective neuropsychological testing showed no evidence of late neurotoxicity., Interpretation: In this study of two different methotrexate-based combination regimens in elderly patients, the efficacy endpoints tended to favour the methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine, and cytarabine group. Both regimens were associated with similar, moderate toxicity, but quality of life improved with time, suggesting pursuing treatment in these poor prognosis patients is worthwhile. New alternatives are needed to improve response duration in this population., Funding: Schering-Plough/Merck and French Government., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Angiogenesis is one of the key features of glioblastoma (GBM). Our objective was to explore the potential changes of angiogenic factors in GBM between initial diagnosis and recurrence after radiotherapy-temozolomide (RT/TMZ). Paired frozen tumors from both initial and recurrent surgery were available for 29 patients. Screening of genes expressions related to angiogenesis was performed using RT- PCR arrays on 10 first patients. Next, RNA expressions of the selected genes were analyzed on all samples. Protein expression was examined by immunohistochemistry. The anti-tumor effect of AMD3100 (anti-CXCR4) was tested in GBM explants. In the screening step, the initial-recurrence expression changes contributed to a selection of seven genes (VEGFA, VEGFR2, VEGFR1, CXCL12, CXCR4, uPA HIF1α). By quantitative RT-PCR, RNA expressions of CXCR4 (p = 0.029) and CXCL12 (p = 0.107) were increased while expressions of HIF1α (p = 0.009) and VEGFR2 (p = 0.081) were decreased at recurrence. Similarly, CXCL12 protein expression tended to increase (p = 0.096) while VEGFR2 staining was decreased (p = 0.004) at recurrence. An increase of anti-tumoral effect was observed with the combination of AMD3100 and RT/TMZ versus RT/TMZ alone in GB explants. Recurrence of GB after chemo-radiation could be associated with a switch of angiogenic pattern from VEGFR2-HIF1α to CXCL12-CXCR4 pathway, leading to new perspectives in angiogenic treatment.

Context: Temozolomide (TMZ) is approved for the treatment of high-grade gliomas such as glioblastoma (GBM) multiforme and refractory anaplastic astrocytoma, but it is also used in indications not mentioned in the summary of product characteristics (SPC). The main objective of this study was to evaluate the conformity of TMZ prescriptions to the French SPC and prescription guidebook., Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of all consecutive patients treated with TMZ in 21 French hospitals between September 2006 and February 2007, accounting for 39% of total TMZ consumption in France. The conformity of TMZ prescriptions was evaluated in terms of the indication, dosage, treatment duration, and combination with other treatments, with respect to the SPC and prescription guidebook., Results: We enrolled 831 patients (median age, 56 years) who received a total of 5982 TMZ treatment cycles. TMZ was mainly prescribed to patients with newly diagnosed GBM (384 patients), GBM in progression/relapse (28 patients), or anaplastic astrocytoma in progression/relapse (19 patients). Prescriptions conformed to the SPC in 51.9% of cases and to the prescription guidebook in 91.5% of cases. Global conformity with the SPC, in terms of the dosage, treatment duration, and combination with other treatments, was 62% for newly diagnosed GBM treated with radiotherapy plus TMZ, 72% for TMZ maintenance monotherapy, and 66% for GBM and anaplastic astrocytoma in progression/relapse., Conclusion/discussion: In France, routine TMZ prescriptions conform to the SPC and practice guidebook. This is one of the largest studies of drug use in neuro-oncology in terms of the number of patients and cycles analyzed., (Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Medulloblastoma (MB) is the most common malignant pediatric brain tumor and a rare adulthood tumor. Twenty percent to 30% of patients relapses and displays a poor prognosis. The management of recurrent disease represents a medical challenge as salvage therapy with high-dose chemotherapy is disappointing. We report a pilot study of reirradiation and concomitant metronomic temozolomide of MB focal recurrence. Five patients from 10 to 27 years old at time of first diagnosis were treated initially with upfront radiation therapy at full dose. They relapsed focally and progressed under chemotherapy with a time recurrence ranged from 2 to 15 years after initial diagnosis. Patients were then treated with 3-dimensional conformal reirradiation focused on the relapsed disease with a median dose of 28 Gy (1.8 Gy per fraction) and concomitant temozolomide (75 mg/m/d) alone or as part of a multidrug metronomic regimen. Five complete responses were obtained at the end of metronomic radiochemotherapy. The median follow-up was 28 months. At last follow-up, 3 patients progressed outside radiation field under maintenance chemotherapy, and 1 is free of disease. Only 1 patient relapsed in the reirradiation field. No neurological toxicity was observed. These results indicate a possible radiosensitizing effect of concomitant metronomic temozolomide with radiation therapy. This association could play a role in the management of high-risk MB patient with oligometastasis disease to increase local control.

Background: Cancer stem cells are thought to represent the population of tumorigenic cells responsible for tumor development. The CD133 antigen has been described as a putative stem cell marker in malignant brain tumor that could identify such a tumorigenic population in a subset of glioblastoma. To date, the correlation between CD133 expression in primary glioblastoma and patient prognosis is not clearly established. To address this question we investigated the relationship between CD133 mRNA expression and patient outcome in a glioblastoma patient cohort., Materials and Methods: The quantitative expression of CD133 stem cell antigen mRNA using real-time QRT-PCR was assessed in a cohort of 48 consecutive primary glioblastoma patients treated by chemoradiation with temozolomide., Results: On multivariate survival analysis, high CD133 mRNA expression was a significant (P = 0.007) prognostic factor for adverse progression-free and overall survival independent of extent of resection (P = 0.012) and MGMT methylation status (P = 0.002). Patient age was also an independent prognosticator of overall survival (P = 0.037). Furthermore, according to the conjoined expression of CD133 mRNA and MGMT status, the patients were categorized into 3 groups with homogenous prognosis., Conclusions: These findings constitute conclusive evidence that the measurement of the mRNA expression of CD133 stem cell antigen actually impacts the survival of GBM patients.

Purpose: The management of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in elderly patients with poor performance status is not well established. A trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of temozolomide alone in this population was undertaken., Patients and Methods: Patients age 70 years or older with newly diagnosed GBM and postoperative Karnofsky performance score (KPS) less than 70 were eligible for this nonrandomized phase II trial. Treatment consisted of 150 to 200 mg/m(2)/d temozolomide for 5 days every 4 weeks until disease progression. Radiotherapy was not administered. The primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), safety, quality of life, and cognition., Results: Seventy patients (median age, 77 years; median KPS, 60) were enrolled between July 2007 and February 2009. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 13% and 14% of patients, respectively. Median PFS was 16 weeks (95% CI, 10 to 20 weeks), and median OS was 25 weeks (95% CI, 19 to 28 weeks), comparing favorably with a 12- to 16-week OS expected from a purely supportive approach. Twenty-three patients (33%) improved their KPS by 10 or more points, and 18 (26%) became capable of self-care (KPS ≥ 70). Overall quality of life and cognition improved over time before disease progression. In the 31 tumors evaluated for O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, a methylated status indicated longer PFS (26 v 11 weeks; P = .03) and OS (31 v 19 weeks; P = .03)., Conclusion: Temozolomide has an acceptable tolerance in elderly patients with GBM and KPS less than 70. It is associated with improvement of functional status in 33% of patients and appears to increase survival compared with supportive care alone, especially in patients with methylated MGMT promoter.

Despite treatment with the current standard-of-care therapies, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) exhibit dismal prognoses. Bevacizumab has demonstrated activity in patients with recurrent GBM and phase 2 trials indicate that the combination of bevacizumab with standard-of-care therapy is feasible and active for patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Bevacizumab has been granted US approval for use as single-agent therapy for patients with progressive GBM following prior therapy, although it has not received approval for use in patients with GBM in Europe. Phase 3 studies have been initiated in patients with newly diagnosed GBM and are currently recruiting patients. We describe the protocol for the AVAglio phase 3 registration trial, which is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining bevacizumab with standard-of-care therapy in patients with newly diagnosed GBM.

Upfront temozolomide (TMZ) is often proposed for elderly patients with malignant gliomas as an alternative to radiotherapy (RT). A recent randomized trial showed that RT provides a survival benefit in elderly glioblastoma patients (>or=70 years) with good performance status (KPS >or= 70) compared with supportive care alone (median survival (MS) = 29.1 vs. 16.9 weeks). We retrospectively analyzed all patients who were eligible for this trial, but who refused to participate and were finally treated with TMZ alone. Thirty-nine eligible patients (median age: 75 years (range 70-83), median KPS: 70 (range 70-80), histologically proven glioblastomas) were treated up-front with oral TMZ for 1-12 cycles (mean = 5). One complete response and 10 partial responses were observed. Overall median survival (MS) was 36 weeks and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 20 weeks for the whole group. MS was 27.4 weeks and PFS was 19.5 weeks for the 27 patients that did not receive second-line treatment at progression. Eight grade III/IV toxicities (seven hematologic, one gastro-intestinal) were seen, but no treatment-related deaths were observed. These preliminary results support further randomized studies comparing TMZ with RT.

Malignant gliomas are the most frequent primary brain tumors in adults. Temozolomide is an oral alkylating cytotoxic agent of second generation, used in the treatment of high-grade gliomas. It is indicated in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiform as well as in recurrent or progressive malignant gliomas, such as glioblastoma multiform or anaplastic astrocytoma. However, temozolomide is also used, off label, in other clinical situations and the main objective of this study was to establish recommendations and guidelines for relevant prescriptions of temozolomide in primary brain tumors and brain metastasis in adults. The literature review was analysed by experts who determined the evidence level (A to E) according to the scale of recommendations adopted by the "Haute Autorité de santé--HAS--(French National Authority for Health)". For high-grade and low-grade gliomas, based on the level of evidence from the literature, the use of temozolomide can be justified, with a B2 score attributed to these indications. In contrast, for the others indications, the use of temozolomide appeared to be more controversial or even not recommended (score C to E). Regarding the dosing schedule and administration scheme, as well as the co-administration with other anticancer drugs, a C score was attributed for the off label situations.

During these last 25 years, despite numerous phases III studies, standard of treatment in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) consisted of surgery and post-operative radiotherapy, while benefit of chemotherapy was a matter of debate. A phase III study, conducted by EORTC and NCI Canada and involving 573 patients, concluded clearly to the benefit of adding temozolomide during and after radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment. Using this schedule, median survival increase from 12,1 to 14,6 months, and 2 year survival rate from 8 to 26%. In the same time, for anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO) the phase III study conducted by Cairncross, that compared radiotherapy to a schedule that deliver a chemotherapy with PCV followed by radiotherapy, failed to determine a significant benefit on overall survival, despite the particular chemosensitivity of theses tumors. Moreover, these two studies did underlined impact of biological markers (methylation of the promoter of O6 methylguanine DNA transferase (MGMT) gene for GBM and chromosomes 1p and 19q deletion for AO), that may become decisional markers in the future. We review here the new place of chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of GBM and anaplastic gliomas, as well as the impact of these pivotal studies on second lines therapies, and future clinical research.

Background: Because of the diffuse nature of gliomatosis cerebri (GC), surgery is not suitable, and large field radiotherapy carries the risk of severe toxicity. In this setting, initial chemotherapy warrants further investigation., Methods: The authors treated 63 consecutive patients with GC with initial chemotherapy consisting of either PCV (procarbazine, 60 mg/m2 on days 8 to 21; CCNU, 110 mg/m2 on day 1; and vincristine, 1.4 mg/m2 on days 8 and 29) or temozolomide (TMZ; 150 to 200 mg/m2 for 5 days every 4 weeks). There were 40 men and 23 women, with a median age of 48 years (range, 17 to 74 years) and a median Karnofsky performance status of 90 (range, 50 to 100). GC was initially present at diagnosis in 49 patients (primary GC), whereas 14 patients with a circumscribed glioma at onset developed secondary GC after a median follow-up period of 5.11 years. GC was classified based on the predominant tumor cells as astrocytic, oligodendroglial, or mixed GC., Results: Seventeen patients received 1 to 6 cycles (median, 5) of PCV, and 46 received 2 to 24 courses (median, 13) of TMZ. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity was seen in 4 of 17 (23.5%) patients treated with PCV and in 4 of 46 (8.6%) of those treated with TMZ. Clinical objective responses were observed in 21 of 63 (33%) patients, and radiologic responses were seen in 16 of 62 (26%), with no significant difference between the two regimens. For all patients combined, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16 months and 29 months, respectively. Regardless of the chemotherapeutic regimen, oligodendroglial GC had a better prognosis than astrocytic and oligoastrocytic GC in terms of PFS (p < 0.02) and OS (p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Initial chemotherapy is useful for some patients with gliomatosis cerebri. Temozolomide is well tolerated and appears to be a valuable alternative to procarbazine-CCNU-vincristine, especially for those with slow-growing, low-grade GC.

Purpose: Oligodendroglial tumors are chemotherapy-sensitive tumors, with two thirds of patients responding to combination chemotherapy with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV). Temozolomide (TMZ), a new alkylating and methylating agent, has demonstrated high response rates in patients with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma. We investigated TMZ as first-line chemotherapy in recurrent oligodendroglial tumors (OD) and mixed oligoastrocytomas (OA) after surgery and radiation therapy., Patients and Methods: In a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter, phase II trial, patients were treated with 200 mg/m2 of TMZ on days 1 through 5 in 28-day cycles for 12 cycles. Patients with a recurrence after prior surgery and radiotherapy, and with measurable and enhancing disease on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were eligible for this study. Patients with large lesions and mass effect or with new clinical deficits were not eligible. Pathology and the MRI scans of all responding patients were centrally reviewed., Results: Thirty-eight eligible patients were included. In three patients, pathology review did not confirm the presence of an OD or OA. TMZ was generally well tolerated. The most frequent side effects were hematologic; only one patient discontinued treatment for toxicity. In 20 (52.6%) of 38 patients (95% exact confidence interval, 35.8% to 69.0%), a complete (n = 10) or partial response to TMZ was observed. The median time to progression was 10.4 months for all patients and 13.2 months for responding patients. At 12 months from the start of treatment, 40% of patients were still free from progression., Conclusion: TMZ provides an excellent response rate with good tolerability in chemotherapy-naive patients with recurrent OD. A randomized phase III study comparing PCV with TMZ is warranted.

Background: Oligodendroglial tumors are chemosensitive, with two-thirds of patients responding to PCV combination chemotherapy with procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU) and vincristine. Temozolomide (TMZ), a new alkylating and methylating agent has shown high response rates in recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma. We investigated this drug in recurrent oligodendroglial tumors (OD) and mixed oligoastrocytomas (OA) after prior PCV chemotherapy and radiation therapy., Patients and Methods: In a prospective non-randomized multicenter phase II trial patients were treated with TMZ 150 mg/m(2) on days 1-5 in cycles of 28 days for 12 cycles. Eligible patients had a recurrence after prior PCV chemotherapy, with measurable and enhancing disease as shown by magnetic resonance imaging. Pathology and all responses were centrally reviewed., Results: Thirty-two eligible patients were included. In four patients the pathology review did not confirm the presence of an OD or OA. Twelve of 24 patients [50%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 29% to 71%] evaluable for response to first-line PCV chemotherapy had responded to PCV. Temozolomide was in general well tolerated; the most frequent side-effects were hematological. One patient discontinued treatment due to toxicity. In seven of 28 patients (25%, 95% CI 11% to 45%) with histologically confirmed OD an objective response to TMZ was observed. Median time to progression for responding patients was 8.0 months. After 6 and 12 months from the start of treatment, 29% and 11% of patients, respectively, were still free from progression., Conclusions: TMZ may be regarded as the preferred second-line treatment in OD after failure of PCV chemotherapy. Further studies on TMZ in OD are indicated.

Oligodendroglial tumors include the highly chemosensitive oligodendroglioma and mixed oligoastrocytoma. Patients with these tumors have a longer median survival and time to disease progression than patients with other brain tumor types, but the range is wide and the disease is inevitably fatal. Because of their chemosensitivity and the potential for radiation toxicity, low-grade oligodendroglioma are increasingly being treated with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiation therapy. Approximately two thirds of patients with the more aggressive form (anaplastic oligodendroglioma) have shown substantial response to first-line procarbazine/lomustine/vincristine (PCV) therapy. However, experience with chemotherapy for relapse of disease following PCV therapy is limited. Several small trials have shown the safety and activity of temozolomide (Temodar in the United States, Temodal globally; Schering Corporation, Kenilworth, NJ) in oligodendroglioma, regardless of prior PCV therapy. An open-label, phase II trial of temozolomide in 47 patients with relapsed oligodendroglioma showed an objective response rate of 43%, of which seven (15%) were complete responses. Median progression-free survival was 6 months and 34% of patients were disease-free at 12 months. Median survival was 26 months for complete responders and 11 months for partial responders. Temozolomide was well tolerated. The only grade (3/4) toxicity with temozolomide treatment was thrombocytopenia, which occurred in < or = 5% of the 382 treatment cycles administered. The encouraging results of ongoing trials with temozolomide suggest the potential for its use as a first-line therapy in this patient population., (Copyright 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.)

Purpose: Most primary oligodendrogliomas and mixed gliomas (oligoastrocytoma) respond to treatment with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV), with response rates of approximately 80%. However, limited data on second-line treatments are available in patients with recurrent tumors. A novel second-generation alkylating agent, temozolomide, has recently demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma. This study describes the effects of temozolomide in patients with recurrent anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO) and anaplastic mixed oligoastrocytoma (AOA)., Patients and Methods: Forty-eight patients with histologically confirmed AO or AOA who had received previous PCV chemotherapy were treated with temozolomide (150 to 200 mg/m2/d for 5 days per 28-day cycle). The primary end point was objective response. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression, overall survival (OS), safety, and tolerability., Results: Eight patients (16.7%) experienced a complete response, 13 patients (27.1%) experienced a partial response (objective response rate, 43.8%), and 19 patients (39.6%) experienced stable disease. For the entire treatment group, median PFS was 6.7 months and median OS was 10 months. For objective responders, median PFS was 13.1 months and median OS was 16 months. For complete responders, PFS was more than 11. 8 months and OS was more than 26 months. Response correlated with improved survival. Temozolomide was safe and well tolerated. Twelve patients developed grade 1/2 thrombocytopenia and three patients developed grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia., Conclusion: Temozolomide is safe and effective in the treatment of recurrent AO and AOA.