Search

Simultaneous induction of tumor antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and helper T lymphocytes (HTLs) is required for an optimal anti-tumor immune response. WT1332, a 16-mer WT1-derived helper peptide, induce HTLs in an HLA class II-restricted manner and enhance the induction of WT1-specific CTLs in vitro. However, in vivo immune reaction to WT1332 vaccination in tumor-bearing patients remained unclear. Here, a striking difference in WT1-specific T cell responses was shown between WT1 CTL + WT1 helper peptide and WT1 CTL peptide vaccines in patients with recurrent glioma. WT1-specific CTLs were more strongly induced in the patients who were immunized with WT1 CTL + WT1 helper peptide vaccine, compared to those who were immunized with WT1 CTL vaccine alone. Importantly, a clear correlation was demonstrated between WT1-specific CTL and WT1332-specific HTL responses. Interestingly, two novel distinct populations of WT1-tetramerlow WT1-TCRlow CD5low and WT1-tetramerhigh WT1-TCRhigh CD5high CTLs were dominantly detected in WT1 CTL + WT1 helper peptide vaccine. Although natural WT1 peptide-reactive CTLs in the latter population were evidently less than those in the former population, the latter population showed natural WT1 peptide-specific proliferation capacity comparable to the former population, suggesting that the latter population highly expressing CD5, a marker of resistance to activation-induced cell death, should strongly expand and persist for a long time in patients. These results demonstrated the advantage of WT1 helper peptide vaccine for the enhancement of WT1-specific CTL induction by WT1 CTL peptide vaccine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Helper T lymphocytes (HTLs) play a central role in cancer immunity because they can not only help the induction and proliferation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) but also their differentiation into cytotoxic CD4+ T cells and directly kill the target cells.This study describes the identification of three novel mouse Th epitope peptides, WT135-52, WT186-102 and WT1294-312, derived from WT1 protein, which is the most potent tumor-associated antigen. Compared to immunization with WT1 CTL peptide alone, immunization with the addition of these WT1-specific Th peptides strongly induced WT1-specific CTLs, continued to maintain them, and efficiently rejected the challenge of WT1-expressing tumor cells. Importantly, the majority of WT1-specific CTLs induced by the co-immunization with WT1 CTL and the WT1-specific Th peptides were CD44+CD62L− effector memory CD8+ T cells, which played a central role in tumor rejection. Establishment of mouse models suitable for the analysis of the detailed mechanism of these functions of HTLs is very important. These results clearly showed that WT1-specific HTLs perform an essential function in WT1-specific tumor immunity. Therefore, the WT1-specific Th peptides identified here should make a major contribution to elucidation of the mutual roles of WT1-specific CTLs and HTLs in cancer immunity in in vivo mouse models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Wilms' tumor gene 1 (WT1) protein is a promising tumor-associated antigen for cancer immunotherapy. We have been performing WT1 peptide vaccination with good clinical responses in over 750 patients with leukemia or solid cancers. In this study, we generated single-cell gene-expression profiles of the effector memory (EM) subset of WT1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) in peripheral blood of nine acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with WT1 peptide vaccine, in order to discriminate responders ( WT1 mRNA levels in peripheral blood decreased to undetectable levels, decreased but stayed at abnormal levels, were stable at undetectable levels, or remained unchanged from the initial abnormal levels more than 6 months after WT1 vaccination) from non-responders (leukemic blast cells and/or WT1 mRNA levels increased relative to the initial state within 6 months of WT1 vaccination) prior to WT1 vaccination. Cluster and principal component analyses performed using 83 genes did not discriminate between responders and non-responders prior to WT1 vaccination. However, these analyses revealed that EM subset of WT1-specific CTLs could be divided into two groups: the 'activated' and 'quiescent' states; in responders, EM subset of the CTLs shifted to the 'quiescent' state, whereas in non-responders, those shifted to the 'activated' state following WT1 vaccination. These results demonstrate for the first time the existence of two distinct EM states, each of which was characteristic of responders or non-responders, of WT1-specific CTLs in AML patients, and raises the possibility of using advanced gene-expression profile analysis to clearly discriminate between responders and non-responders prior to WT1 vaccination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]