Search

Background: Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is still one of the major concerning infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Letermovir (LTV) has been recently introduced for HCMV prophylaxis in adult patients who received allogeneic HSCT. However, many aspects related to immune reconstitution need to be further explored. The aim of this study was to define the prognostic role of HCMV-specific T-cell frequency measured at the end of LTV prophylaxis in predicting the risk for clinically significant HCMV infection (i.e. infection requiring antiviral treatment) after the stop of the prophylaxis., Methods: Sixty-six adult patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT were enrolled and HCMV DNAemia was prospectively monitored. Additionally, HCMV-specific T-cell response was evaluated using ELISpot assay against two different antigens (HCMV infected cell lysate and pp65 peptide pool)., Results: Ten patients (15.2%) developed at least one positive HCMV DNAemia episode during LTV prophylaxis, whereas 50/66 (75.8%) patients developed at least one positive HCMV DNA event after LTV prophylaxis. Of note, 25 of them (50%) experienced a clinically significant HCMV infection. The median HCMV-specific T-cell response measured against HCMV lysate but not against pp65 peptide pool was lower in patients who developed HCMV clinically significant infection after prophylaxis. A ROC analysis revealed that the level of 0.04 HCMV-specific T cells/µl should be used as cut-off for development of clinically significant HCMV reactivation after prophylaxis., Conclusion: Assessment of HCMV-specific immunity upon discontinuation of universal prophylaxis with LTV should be considered as a method for identification of patients at risk for clinically significant HCMV infection., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest, (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Letermovir (LTV), recently approved for the prophylaxis of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) reactivation after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), has been shown to decrease the rate of infection in the first months post-transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of LTV prophylaxis on immune reconstitution and late-onset infection. We studied HCMV infection and HCMV-specific T cell reconstitution in 2 matched groups of HSCT recipients, those treated with LTV prophylaxis (n = 30; LTV group) and those receiving preemptive therapy (n = 31; PET group). We analyzed the rates of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), neutropenia, baseline disease recurrence, and overall survival in the 2 groups. Clinically significant infections necessitating preemptive therapy showed a similar rate in the 2 groups (PET: 21 of 31 [68%]; LTV: 17 of 30 [57%]; P = .434) but occurred significantly later (after prophylaxis discontinuation) in the LTV group. There was no between-group difference in peak HCMV DNAemia level (P = .232). HCMV-specific T cell recovery was delayed by approximately 100 days in the LTV group. HCMV-specific CD4 and CD8 T cell counts were significantly lower in the LTV group at days 120 to 360 and days 90 to 120, respectively. A lower rate of chronic GVHD (P = .024) was seen in the LTV group. Time to engraftment, rate of disease relapse, and 1-year survival were not different between the 2 groups, whereas trends toward a lower rate of neutropenia (P = .124) and a higher rate of acute GVHD grade III-IV (P = .103) were observed in the LTV group. Because LTV prophylaxis delays HCMV infection and HCMV-specific immune reconstitution, immunologic and virologic monitoring should be implemented after discontinuation of prophylaxis. The potential effect of LTV prophylaxis in reducing chronic GVHD should be evaluated in prospective studies., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection is one of the major causes of mortality and morbidity after allo-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Antiviral therapies are associated with toxicity and high economic burden. The aim of this retrospective study was to identify allo-HSCT HCMV-seropositive recipients at low risk of clinically significant HCMV infection who could avoid antiviral therapies. Sixty adult patients who underwent allo-HSCT were clustered in two groups: i) 22 (37%) spontaneously controlling HCMV reactivation (Controllers); ii) 38 (63%) developing clinically significant HCMV infection and receiving pre-emptive therapy (Non-Controllers). We analyzed several patient baseline characteristics, total/HCMV-specific CD4 + and CD8 + T-cell counts and their cytokine production (IFNγ, TNFα, IL2). Controllers presented a higher number of total/HCMV-specific CD4 + and CD8 + T-cells (P=0.001 and P=0.017 for total CD4 + and CD8 + T-cells respectively; P<0.001 for HCMV-specific T-cells) and a lower percentage of mono-functional IFNγ-producing HCMV-specific CD8 + T-cells (P=0.002). In bi-variable models, the prognostic impact of the percentage of mono-functional HCMV-specific CD8 + T-cells on treatment-free survival, adjusted for total/HCMVspecific CD4 + and CD8 + T-cells, was confirmed. An HCMV-seronegative donor was the only baseline characteristic associated with a clinically significant infection. These data, when confirmed by a larger prospective study, may provide information for guiding the personalized management of HCMV infection in allo-HSCT recipients., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The relative contribution of human cytomegalovirus (HMCV)-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells to the control of HCMV infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients is still controversial. HCMV reactivation and HCMV-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell reconstitution were monitored for 1 year in 63 HCMV-seropositive patients receiving HSCT. HCMV reactivation was detected in all but 2 patients. In 20 of 63 (31.7%) patients (group 1) HCMV infection resolved spontaneously, whereas 32 of 63 (50.8%) patients (group 2) controlled the infection after a single short-course of pre-emptive therapy and the remaining 9 (14.3%) patients (group 3) suffered from relapsing episodes of HCMV infection, requiring multiple courses of antiviral therapy. The kinetics and magnitude of HCMV-specific CD8(+) T cell reconstitution were comparable among the 3 groups, but HCMV-specific CD4(+) T cells were lower in number in patients requiring antiviral treatment. HCMV-seronegative donors, as well as unrelated donors (receiving antithymocyte globulin) and acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were associated with both delayed HCMV-specific CD4(+) T cell reconstitution and severity of infection. Conversely, these risk factors had no impact on HCMV-specific CD8(+) T cells. Eight patients with previous GVHD suffered from HCMV gastrointestinal disease, although in the presence of HCMV-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) systemic immunity and undetectable HCMV DNA in blood. Reconstitution of systemic HCMV-specific CD4(+) T cell immunity is required for control of HCMV reactivation in adult HSCT recipients, but it may not be sufficient to prevent late-onset organ localization in patients with GVHD. HCMV-specific CD8(+) T cells contribute to control of HCMV infection, but only after HCMV-specific CD4(+) T cell reconstitution., (Copyright © 2015 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection of the central nervous system (CNS) is a rare but life threatening condition which may follow hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Diagnosis, monitoring and treatment approaches rely on anecdotal reports., Case Presentations: The different outcomes of HCMV CNS disease in an adult and a pediatric T-cell depleted hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipient are reported. In the first case, HCMV encephalitis emerged in the context of simultaneous impairment of the T- and B-cell immunity. Antiviral treatment only reduced viral load in peripheral blood and the patient died. In the second case, an HCMV radiculopathy was observed and antiviral treatment was adjusted on the basis of intrathecal drug level. In addition, donor HCMV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) were infused. Viral load in the CNS decreased and the patient recovered from the acute event. In neither case were drug-resistant HCMV variants observed in blood or CNS samples., Conclusions: T-cell depleted HSCT appears a predisposing condition for CNS HCMV infection since never observed in other HSCT recipients at our center in the last 15 years. Intensive diagnostic approaches and timely aggressive combination treatments might improve clinical outcome in these patients.

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection is the most frequent infectious complication after conventional allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). From December 1998 to December 2002, we prospectively monitored HCMV reactivation in 59 patients affected by solid tumors and undergoing nonmyeloablative alloSCT (NST). Patients were allografted from HLA-identical sibling donors after fludarabine/cyclophosphamide-based conditioning regimens. Seventeen (28.8%) of 59 patients presented with HCMV antigenemia, and 14 received ganciclovir, with successful HCMV clearance in all cases. No patient developed HCMV viremia or disease. The median time to HCMV reactivation was 54 days (range, 16-245 days) after NST. These patients were compared with a cohort of hematologic patients who were treated with conventional myeloablative alloSCT. Matching criteria included HCMV risk group, stem cell source, donor type, and age. In the myeloablative group, HCMV active infection was observed in 47 (85.4%) of 55 patients at a median time of 30 days (range, 13-64 days) after alloSCT, and HCMV infection occurred more frequently ( P < .001) and earlier ( P = .001) than in NST patients. Patients affected with solid tumors undergoing NST had a reduced and delayed incidence of HCMV active infection.