Search

Stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1/CXCL12) enhances survival of myeloid progenitor cells. The two main questions addressed by us were whether these effects on the progenitors were direct-acting and if SDF-1/CXCL12 enhanced engrafting capability of competitive, repopulating mouse stem cells subjected to short-term ex vivo culture with other growth factors. SDF-1/CXCL12 had survival-enhancing/antiapoptosis effects on human bone marrow (BM) and cord blood (CB) and mouse BM colony-forming units (CFU)-granulocyte macrophage, burst-forming units-erythroid, and CFU-granulocyte-erythroid-macrophage-megakaryocyte with similar dose responses. The survival effects were direct-acting, as assessed on colony formation by single isolated human BM and CB CD34(+++) cells. Effects were mediated through CXCR4 and G(alpha)i proteins. Moreover, SDF-1/CXCL12 greatly enhanced the engrafting capability of mouse long-term, marrow-competitive, repopulating stem cells cultured ex vivo with interleukin-6 and steel factor for 48 h. These results extend information on the survival effects mediated through the SDF-1/CXCL12-CXCR4 axis and may be of relevance for ex vivo expansion and gene-transduction procedures.

Neurexin I α (NRXN1α) and Dystroglycan (DAG1) are membrane receptors which serve as mutual ligands in the neuronal system. Neurexophilins (NXPHs) bind NRXN1α. NRXN1α was expressed in primitive populations in human CB (huCB) and murine BM (muBM). DAG1 is ubiquitously expressed in hematopoietic tissue; however, osteoblasts appear to be sites of very high expression within muBM. High concentrations of NXPH were found in huCB plasma and murine lineage-positive splenocytes. We evaluated effects of these molecules on huCB and muBM hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) and HSCs. At both a single and population cell level in vitro, we found that NXPH1 was a potent inhibitor of HPC proliferation acting through NRXN1α an effect down-modulated by DAG1. Injection of recombinant NXPH1 in vivo resulted in myelo- and lymphosuppression in the BM, with absolute numbers and cycling status of functional and phenotypically defined HPCs dose- and time-dependently decreased. Competitive HSC transplantations showed no change in the long-term repopulating activity of HSCs from mice exposed to recombinant NXPH1. These results demonstrate the presence and function of a regulated signaling axis in hematopoiesis centered on NRXN1α and its modulation by DAG1 and NXPH1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1/CXCL12) and its receptor, CXCR4, are involved in a number of facets of the regulation of hematopoiesis at the level of hematopoietic stem (HSCs) and progenitor (HPCs) cells. Modulation of this ligand–receptor interaction may be of clinical utility. We now report that: (1) the CC chemokine, macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α/CCL3) synergizes with AMD3100 (an antagonist of the binding of SDF-1/CXCL12 to CXCR4) to rapidly mobilize HPCs to the blood of mice; moreover, the combination of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with AMD3100 and MIP-1α/CCL3, given in a specific sequence, mobilizes the greatest number of HPCs compared to any combination of two of these mobilizing agents; (2) pretreatment of recipient mice with Diprotin A, an inhibitor of CD26/Dipeptidylpeptidase IV (DPPIV), enhances the competitive HSCs repopulating capacity of untreated donor cells; (3) the survival-enhancing effects of SDF-1/CXCL12 on HPCs subjected in vitro to delayed addition of growth factors (GFs) are mediated in part through the cell cycle-related proteins p21cip1/waf1 (as assessed using p21cip1/waf1−/− and +/+ mice) and Mad2 (using Mad2 +/− and +/+ mice); and (4) deletion of CD26/DPPIV on mouse bone marrow cells increases the survival-enhancing effects of SDF-1/CXCL12 on HPCs. These results demonstrate the means to increase the mobilization of HPCs, the engrafting capability of HSCs, and responsiveness of HPCs to the survival-enhancing activity of SDF-1/CXCL12, effects that may be of practical value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Interleukin (IL)-31 is a recently discovered helical cytokine. Its receptor consists of a ligand-specific IL-31 receptor (IL-31R) subunit and a receptor chain that is shared with Oncostatin M (OSM), called OSM-Rβ. Because OSM-Rβ–deficient animals have reduced hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) and OSM has effects on and is involved in homeostasis of HPC, we studied whether IL-31 and IL-31R play a role in hematopoiesis. Materials and Methods: IL-31R−/− mice and their littermate wild-type (WT) controls were assessed for absolute numbers and cycling status of bone marrow and spleen HPC (colony-forming unit granulocyte macrophage [CFU-GM], burst-forming unit erythroid [BFU-E], colony-forming unit granulocyte, erythrocyte, macrophage, megakaryocyte). Recombinant IL-31 was evaluated for stimulation, enhancement, or inhibition of colony formation by HPC, and for survival-enhancing effects on HPC subjected to growth-factor withdrawal and delayed addition of grown factors. Hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) from WT and IL-31R−/− mice were compared for competitive repopulating capacity in lethally irradiated congenic mice. Results: IL-31R−/− mice demonstrated significantly decreased absolute numbers and cycling status of immature subsets of HPC in bone marrow bone and spleen compared to WT mice. There were no significant differences in absolute numbers of more mature subsets of WT and IL-31R−/− bone marrow CFU-GM. WT but not IL-31R−/− bone marrow CFU-GM responded to synergistic stimulation by combinations of cytokines. While IL-31 had neither colony-stimulating, -enhancing, or -inhibiting activity for bone marrow HPC, it did enhance survival of these HPC in the context of delayed addition of growth factors. No significant differences were detected in competitive repopulating HSC activity between WT and IL-31R−/− bone marrow cells. Conclusion: IL-31R is involved in positive regulation of absolute numbers and cycling status of immature subsets of HPC in vivo. While IL-31 in vitro does not modulate proliferation of HPC, it does enhance their survival, which may contribute to effects on cycling and numbers of HPC in vivo. Under steady-state conditions, loss of IL-31R on HPC does not appear to influence the activity of competitive repopulating HSC. These results with HPC may be of future utility for manipulation of hematopoiesis in a preclinical setting. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: Iron-binding proteins H-ferritin (HF) and lactoferrin (LF), as well as chemokines, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and interferon (IFN)-γ suppress hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) proliferation. Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II antigens have been associated with suppressive effects of HF and LF. Because the transcription factor class II transactivator (CIITA) regulates expression of MHC class II antigens, we evaluated influences of CIITA and MHC class II antigens on suppression of colony formation by murine bone marrow HPC in response to HF, LF, CC, and CXC chemokines, TNF-α, and IFN-γ. We also evaluated hematopoiesis in mice deficient in both CIITA and MHC class II antigens (CIITA −/−), in mice deficient in MHC class II antigens but not in CIITA (MHC class II −/−), and in mice deficient in CIITA but not in MHC class II antigens (CIITA-IE). Materials and Methods: HF, LF, CCL3/MIP-1α, CXCL5/ENA-78, CXCL8/IL-8, CCL5/RANTES, TNF-α, and IFN-γ were assessed for effects on colony formation by bone marrow HPC (colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophage, burst-forming unit erythroid, and colony-forming unit multipotential) stimulated in vitro by combinations of growth factors including erythropoietin, stem cell factor, pokeweed mitogen mouse spleen cell conditioned medium, and hemin. Bone marrow cells were from CIITA −/−, MHC class II antigen −/−, CIITA-IE, and littermate control mice. We also evaluated cycling status (percent cells in S-phase) and absolute numbers of marrow and spleen HPC in these mice. Results: Multiple growth factor–stimulated colony formation by control bone marrow HPC was significantly suppressed by HF, LF, CCL3, CXCL5, CXCL8, TNF-α, and IFN-γ, but not by CCL5. However, HPC from CIITA −/− and MHC class II antigen −/− mouse marrow was insensitive to inhibition by HF, LF, CCL3, CXCL5, CXCL8, and CCL5; these HPC were inhibited by TNF-α and IFN-γ. Restoration of MHC class II expression in CIITA −/− (CIITA-IE) mice restored responsiveness of HPC to inhibition by HF, LF, CCL3, CXCL5, and CXCL8. Increased cycling of splenic HPC in CIITA −/− and MHC class II antigen −/−, compared to control and CIITA-IE, mice was noted. Conclusions: Myelosuppressive effects of iron-binding proteins HF and LF and chemokines CCL3, CXCL5, and CXCL8 on mouse bone marrow HPC require expression of MHC class II antigens, and CIITA is involved in this responsiveness through its regulation of expression of MHC class II antigens. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Since cord blood (CB) has become a commonly used source of transplantable hematopoietic stem (HSC) and hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC), there has been a need to overcome the limited HSC and HPC numbers available to transplant from a single CB, especially for adult recipients. Our laboratory previously demonstrated that Rheb2 overexpression significantly impaired the repopulating ability of HSC. Since overexpression of Rheb2 leads to increased signaling through mTOR, we examined the effect of the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin ex vivo on cytokine expanded CD34+ CB cells for the engraftment of these cells in non-obese diabetic, severe combined immunodeficient, IL-2 receptor γ chain null (NSG) mice. We observed significant enhancement in engraftment of the CB treated ex vivo with cytokines in the presence of rapamycin prior to transplant, effects seen in primary as well as secondary transplants. These pre-clinical results suggest a positive role for rapamycin during ex vivo culture of CB SCID repopulating cells/HSC. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: Selected chemokines suppress proliferation of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) in vitro; some of these have demonstrated inhibition of myelopoiesis in vivo. Because myelosuppressive chemokines synergize in vitro with other myelosuppressive chemokines, we sought to determine whether additional chemokines active in vitro were myelosuppressive in vivo and whether combinations of myelosuppressive chemokines synergized in vivo to dampen myelopoiesis. We also evaluated three chemokines in vivo for myeloprotection against Ara-C-induced decreases in HPCs. Methods: C3H/HeJ mice were used for analysis of in vivo influence of chemokines, with the end points being effects on absolute numbers and cycling status of HPCs. Results: When used alone, CCL2, CCL3, CCL19, CCL20, CXCL4, CXCL5, CXCL8, CXCL9, and XCL1 caused dose-dependent significant decreases in absolute numbers and cycling status of HPCs in vivo. The following combinations of two chemokines resulted in in vivo myelosuppression at concentrations much lower than that induced by each chemokine alone: CCL3 plus either CXCL8 or CXCL4, CXCL8 plus CXCL4, CCL2 plus either CCL20 or CXCL9, CCL20 plus CXCL9, CXCL5 plus either XCL1 or CCL19, XCL1 plus CCL19, and CCL3 plus CCL19. Also, mice injected with CXCL8, CXCL4, or the chimeric CXCL8/CXCL4 protein CXCL8M1 manifested accelerated recovery of absolute numbers of HPCs in response to the toxic effects of Ara-C administration. Conclusions: A number of chemokines shown previously to manifest inhibitory effects in vitro for proliferation of HPCs are now demonstrated to also induce myelosuppression in vivo. Moreover, combinations of low dosages of two myelosuppressive chemokines when administered together demonstrate synergistic suppression in vivo. Additionally, chemokines, including a CXCL8M1 chimeric protein previously shown to manifest enhanced suppression of HPC proliferation in vitro and in vivo, accelerate HPC recovery after treatment of mice with Ara-C. These results may be of use for future clinical utility of chemokines in a myelosuppressive/myeloprotective setting. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]