Search

To assess the value of administering timed-sequential chemotherapy (TSC; 2 therapeutic sequences separated by a 4-day interval-free chemotherapy) or high-dose cytarabine (HDAraC) cycles in consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 459 patients 15 to 50 years of age were enrolled in the prospective randomized Acute Leukemia French Association-9802 trial. Complete remission was achieved in 89%. A total of 237 patients were then randomized to either TSC consolidation (120 patients) or HDAraC consolidation cycles (117 patients). Overall, there was no significant difference between the 2 consolidation arms (5-year event-free survival [EFS]: 41% for HDAraC vs 35% for TSC), or cumulative incidence of relapse, or treatment-related mortality. Cytogenetically normal AML NPM1(+) or CEBPA(+) and FLT3-ITD(-) had the same outcome as those with favorable cytogenetics. When considering favorable and unfavorable risk groups, the trend was in favor of HDAraC. However, the difference became significant when considering intermediate cytogenetics (5-year EFS: 49% vs 29%; P = .02), especially cytogenetically normal AML (5-year EFS: 48% vs 31%; P = .04), which was related to lower relapse rate and less toxicity. This study demonstrates that TSC did not produce any benefit when used as consolidation therapy in younger adults compared with HDAraC. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00880243.

Not all patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) display a good outcome. Modern risk factors include KIT and/or FLT3 gene mutations and minimal residual disease (MRD) levels, but their respective values have never been prospectively assessed. A total of 198 CBF-AML patients were randomized between a reinforced and a standard induction course, followed by 3 high-dose cytarabine consolidation courses. MRD levels were monitored prospectively. Gene mutations were screened at diagnosis. Despite a more rapid MRD decrease after reinforced induction, induction arm did not influence relapse-free survival (RFS) (64% in both arms; P = .91). Higher WBC, KIT, and/or FLT3-ITDITKD gene mutations, and a less than 3-log MRD reduction after first consolidation, were associated with a higher specific hazard of relapse, but MRD remained the sole prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. At 36 months, cumulative incidence of relapse and RFS were 22% vs 54% (P< .001) and 73% vs 44% (P< .001) in patients who achieved 3-log MRD reduction vs the others. These results suggest that MRD, rather than gene mutations, should be used for future treatment stratifications in CBF-AML patients. This trial was registered at EudraCT as #2006-005163-26 and at www. clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT 00428558. (Blood. 2013;121(12):2213-2223) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: The median survival of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in myeloid blast crisis (MBC-CML) is poor even for patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Design and methods: We conducted a dose-escalating study of daunorubicin combined to fixed doses of IM (imatinib mesylate, 600mg/d) and cytarabine (200mg/d for 7 days), followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or maintenance therapy with single-agent IM in patients with MBC-CML at onset or after failure of therapy excluding TKIs. Results: Thirty-six patients were evaluated. Median follow-up is 6.1 years. Daunorubicin was escaladed up to 45mg/m2/d 3 days. Twenty eight patients (77.7%) had hematologic response including 20 patients (55.5%) in complete hematologic response (CHR). Patients who received daunorubicin at 30–45mg/m2/d had higher CHR rates compared to other patients. Median overall survival was 16 months. Overall survival in patients with hematological response was 35.4 months. Better results were observed in patients diagnosed with MBC-CML at onset. Conclusions: The combination of IM with a standard “3+7” regiment was well tolerated and provided a high response rate. More than 55% of the patients achieved CHR and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) was feasible in half of the cases. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT00219765. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]