Search

Purpose: Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens have extended the curative potential of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation to older adults with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplasia (MDS) but are associated with a high risk of disease relapse. Strategies to reduce recurrence are urgently required. Registry data have demonstrated improved outcomes using a sequential transplant regimen, fludarabine/amsacrine/cytarabine-busulphan (FLAMSA-Bu), but the impact of this intensified conditioning regimen has not been studied in randomized trials., Patients and Methods: Two hundred forty-four patients (median age, 59 years) with high-risk AML (n = 164) or MDS (n = 80) were randomly assigned 1:1 to a fludarabine-based RIC regimen or FLAMSA-Bu. Pretransplant measurable residual disease (MRD) was monitored by flow cytometry (MFC-MRD) and correlated with outcome., Results: There was no difference in 2-year overall survival (hazard ratio 1.05 [85% CI, 0.80 to 1.38] P = .81) or cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (hazard ratio 0.94 [95%CI, 0.60 to 1.46] P = .81) between the control and FLAMSA-Bu arms. Detectable pretransplant MFC-MRD was associated with an increased CIR (2-year CIR 41.0% v 20.0%, P = .01) in the overall trial cohort with a comparable prognostic impact when measured by an unsupervised analysis approach. There was no evidence of interaction between MRD status and conditioning regimen intensity for relapse or survival. Acquisition of full donor T-cell chimerism at 3 months abrogated the adverse impact of pretransplant MRD on CIR and overall survival., Conclusion: The intensified RIC conditioning regimen, FLAMSA-Bu, did not improve outcomes in adults transplanted for high-risk AML or MDS regardless of pretransplant MRD status. Our data instead support the exploration of interventions with the ability to accelerate acquisition of full donor T-cell chimerism as a tractable strategy to improve outcomes in patients allografted for AML.

The FLAMSA reduced intensity (RIC) concept, also known as "sequential therapy", is a conceptual platform for the treatment of leukemia separated in several parts: induction therapy, a sequence of antileukemic and immunosuppressive conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation, and immune restitution supported by donor lymphocyte transfusions. The antileukemic part consists of fludarabine, cytosine arabinoside, and amsacrine (FLAMSA); non-cross reactive agents like fludarabine and amsacrine have been successfully used in cases of refractoriness and relapse. Immunosuppressive conditioning and transplantation follow after only 3 days of rest. This way, the toxicity of allogeneic transplantation could be reduced and the anti-leukemia effects by using allogeneic immune cells could be optimized. This review summarizes available data on efficacy and toxicity of this approach. Further, possible strategies for improvements are discussed in order to provide better chances for elderly and frail patients and patients with advanced and high-risk disease. Among others, several new agents are available that target molecular changes of leukemia for induction of remission and allow for bridging the time after transplantation until adoptive immunotherapy becomes safe and effective.

Purpose: To assess the treatment outcome benefit of multiagent consolidation in young adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial., Patients and Methods: Between December 2003 and November 2009, 1,179 patients (median age, 48 years; range, 16 to 60 years) with untreated AML were randomly assigned at diagnosis to receive either standard high-dose cytarabine consolidation with three cycles of 18 g/m(2) (3× HD-AraC) or multiagent consolidation with two cycles of mitoxantrone (30 mg/m(2)) plus cytarabine (12 g/m(2)) and one cycle of amsacrine (500 mg/m(2)) plus cytarabine (10 g/m(2); MAC/MAMAC/MAC). Allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantations were performed in a risk-adapted and priority-based manner., Results: After double induction therapy using a 3 + 7 regimen including standard-dose cytarabine and daunorubicin, complete remission was achieved in 65% of patients. In the primary efficacy population of patients evaluable for consolidation outcomes, consolidation with either 3× HD-AraC or MAC/MAMC/MAC did not result in any significant difference in 3-year overall (69% v 64%; P = .18) or disease-free survival (46% v 48%; P = .99) according to the intention-to-treat analysis. Furthermore, MAC/MAMAC/MAC led to additional GI and hepatic toxicity and a higher rate of infection and bleeding, resulting in significantly shorter 3-year overall survival in the per-protocol analysis compared with 3× HD-AraC (63% v 72%; P = .04)., Conclusion: In younger adults with AML, multiagent consolidation using mitoxantrone and amsacrine in combination with high-dose cytarabine does not improve treatment outcome and confers additional toxicity.

We have compared the efficacy of two PBSC mobilisation regimens, mini-ICE+filgrastim (second consolidation) and HiDAC+AMSA+filgrastim (third consolidation), in two consecutive cohorts of patients with AML CR1 receiving treatment according to a joint protocol. Group A: 18 patients, aged 41 (21-65) years, were mobilised with mini-ICE (idarubicin 8 mg/m(2)+cytarabine 800 mg/m(2)+etoposide 150 mg/m(2) days 1-3) followed by filgrastim 300-480 microg once daily s.c. from day 11 after start of chemotherapy. Only four patients reached >5 CD34+ cells/microl blood (B-CD34+) and were able to undergo leukaphereses. Two out of 18 (11%) reached the defined target of >/=2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg after 1-3 leukaphereses. Group B: 20 patients, aged 50 (29-67) years, received HiDAC+AMSA (cytarabine 3 g/m(2) b.i.d. days 1, 3, 5+amsacrine 150 mg/m(2) q.d. days 2, 4) followed by filgrastim at a similar dose starting on day 7. A total of 18 patients reached B-CD34+ >5/microl and underwent PBSC harvesting, starting on day 23 (14-29) and yielding 4.0 (0.9-21) x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. Of 20 patients, 17 (85%) reached the defined target of >/=2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg after 1-3 leukaphereses. We conclude that HiDAC+AMSA+G-CSF - in contrast to mini-ICE+G-CSF - is an efficient regimen for mobilising PBSC in patients with AML CR1.

Stem cell transplantation (SCT) may be the only curative option for patients with relapsed or refractory leukaemia, that is, high-risk (HR) leukaemia. Several salvage regimens have been used to cytoreduce disease before SCT, but disease progression or treatment toxicity limits numbers of patients receiving SCT. Here, we report our experience with high-dose cytarabine and amsacrine (Ara-amsa) to salvage patients with HR-leukaemia in the context of SCT. A total of 34 patients with HR-leukaemia (20 AML, 12 ALL, two advanced CML) received 3 g/m(2)/day cytarabine for 5 days and amsacrine 200 mg/m(2)/day for 3 days. Disease response was observed in 62% of patients. Toxicity was limited to neutropenic fever, one patient developed cerebellar toxicity and there was one treatment-related death. A total of 17 patients proceeded to SCT (12 allografts and five autografts). Median survival (OS) of all patients was 10.8 months (95% CI 7.8-21). Patients who were consolidated with SCT after salvage therapy had a superior median OS of 29.4 months (95% CI 12.5-upper limit not reached, n=17) than those who did not receive SCT (6.7 months, CI 1.5-8.6, P<0.0001). Median disease-free survival with SCT (23 months) was higher than after treatment with salvage chemotherapy alone (6.7 months, P=0.0002). Thus Ara-amsa can be used effectively to salvage HR-leukaemia, enabling further consolidation with SCT.

In 145 adult patients diagnosed with non-M3 acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) the relevance of FAB-subtype and immunophenotype to in vitro cellular drug resistance towards the anthracyclines aclarubicin (Acla) and daunorubicin (Dau), and the nucleoside analogue cytarabine (Ara-C), as well as other antileukaemic drugs, was investigated using a 4-d MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) assay. We demonstrate that high CD14 expression is highly significantly associated with high cellular Ara-C and Dau resistance in univariate as well as multivariate analyses. FAB subtypes with highest and lowest cellular Ara-C resistance were M4 and M5, respectively (P < 0.01, one-way anova), whereas FAB subtypes with highest and lowest cellular Dau resistance were M4 and M1, respectively (P < 0.01, one-way anova). By contrast, no significant differences in cellular drug resistance towards Acla could be demonstrated among FAB subtypes. Furthermore, in two cohorts of AML patients treated by two different regimens for remission induction over a period of 15 yr (1985-94, n = 159 and 1995-99, n = 76, respectively) we demonstrate in univariate analyses a significance of CD14 expression with respect to clinical outcome. With the exception of significance to probability of obtaining complete remission in the first cohort (P = 0.03, logistic regression), this significance was, however, lost in multivariate analyses. It was demonstrated that FAB-M4 patients were older than M5 patients and that high CD14 expression was associated with the presence of secondary AML and older age. We conclude that although cases with high blast cell CD14 expression (and FAB-M4 cases) were more resistant to Ara-C as well as Dau in vitro, the clinical and biological significance of this may be debatable because of interactions with major prognostic factors in AML.

In 85 adult patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and treated at the same institution during a 5-yr period, the clinical significance of in vitro cellular drug resistance to the anthracyclines aclarubicin (Acla) and daunorubicin (Dau) as well as the nucleoside analogue cytarabine (Ara-C) was investigated using a 4-d MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) assay. In 59 patients of whom 40 were treated by the combination of Acla and Ara-C we found that leukaemia cell drug resistance towards Acla was higher (by a factor 2.80) in patients who failed to enter complete remission (CR) after the first cycle of induction chemotherapy as compared to patients who entered complete remission. The relationship was significant in univariate as well as multivariate analysis (p=0.02 and 0.03, respectively). By contrast, no in vitro single drug resistance values were consistently correlated to other parameters of clinical outcome (overall CR rate, overall survival (OS), or continuous complete remission (CCR)), whereas the combined Acla and Ara-C drug resistance profile (Acla/Ara-C DRP) was of prognostic significance to overall survival of all 85 patients (p=0.004) as well as to the CCR of 39 complete responders (p=0.04). These findings remained statistically significant in multivariate analyses correcting for other variables influencing clinical outcome including patient age, leukocyte count, karyotype, FAB-subtype, and presence/absence of secondary AML. We conclude that the in vitro drug resistance of leukaemia cells at time of disease presentation appears to be independent of prognostic significance to short- and long-term clinical outcome in AML.

Development of neoplastic diseases can lead to various metabolic changes in the bone tissue. The aim of the present study was to investigate effects of two antineoplastic agents: amsacrine and cytarabine on the bone system in rats. The experiments were carried out on male Wistar rats (initial body mass: 115-150 g). Amsacrine or cytarabine were administered subcutaneously in a dose of 3 mg/kg daily for four weeks. Cytarabine was administered every day, whereas amsacrine was administered every day for the first 7 days and then, after a five-day break, every second day up to the end of the experiment. The results were compared with those of appropriate control groups. Bone mass, length, diameter, mineral and calcium content, incorporation and release of 45Ca+2 in bones, transverse growth, width of endosteal and periosteal osteoid, transverse cross-section area of the cortical part of the diaphysis and of the marrow cavity in the tibia, width of epiphyseal cartilage, width of trabeculae and mechanical properties in the femur were examined. Administration of amsacrine caused osteopenic changes in rat bones, with decreases in bone mass, mineral content, longitudinal and transverse growth of the long bones, width of endosteal and periosteal osteoid, transverse cross-section area of the cortical part of the tibial diaphysis, width of trabeculae and width of epiphyseal cartilage. Disorders in the calcium metabolism in the bone tissue (decreases in the incorporation and release of 45Ca+2 in bones) and worsening of mechanical properties of the long bones were observed. After administration of cytarabine, the damages to processes of bone tissue remodeling were much lesser. Decreases in bone mass, bone mineral content and incorporation and release of 45Ca+2 were observed.

Background: The outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who relapse or fail to achieve an initial remission has been dismal., Procedure: Fifteen pediatric patients with AML, 4 relapsed and 11 primary refractory, were reinduced with a loading bolus of 0.5 g/m2 cytarabine (ara-C) followed immediately by a continuous infusion of ara-C (130 mg/m2/day) for 72 hours, followed with four daily doses (12 mg/m2/day) of mitoxantrone. Eight of 15 patients received an additional course of amsacrine and etoposide., Results: Ten of 15 (66%) achieved complete response (CR) and 3 achieved partial response (PR) (20%), with an objective response rate of 86% after ara-C/mitoxantrone. One patient died before disease assessment, and one had no response after ara-C/mitoxantrone. Pharmacokinetic studies of ara-C and ara-U were performed in 13 of 15 patients. A steady-state (Css) ara-C concentration was achieved at 2 hours after the bolus ara-C dose and was maintained up to 72 hours. The Css plasma concentrations of ara-C and ara-U averaged 10.33 +/- 0.81 microM and 139.14 +/- 17.8 microM, respectively. Also, cellular pharmacokinetic studies of ara-CTP were performed on circulating leukemic cells from 5 patients. Four patients who had a significant increase (P = 0.0041) in their Css ara-CTP concentrations achieved CR, whereas one patient with an insignificant increase achieved PR., Conclusions: Continuous infusion of ara-C followed by mitoxantrone is an active reinduction regimen in refractory or relapsed pediatric AML patients. The addition of amsacrine and etoposide did not improve the remission induction rate. Further studies are needed in a larger patient population to confirm these observations.

Thirty-two patients with untreated ALL (n = 26) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (n = 6) between 17 and 65 years of age were treated with a short remission induction course with VP16-213, amsacrine, intermediate dose Ara-C for 6 days, prednisone and intrathecal methotrexate, followed by a consolidation course with vincristine, amsacrine, high dose Ara-C for 4 days, prednisone and intrathecal methotrexate. After subsequent cranial irradiation, no further maintenance was planned. However, some patients underwent an allogenic (n = 5) or autologous (n = 5) bone marrow transplantation after the consolidation treatment. Twenty-three of 32 patients (72%) achieved a complete remission. Ten of 13 patients with T-ALL or lymphoma, six of eight patients with pre-B or common ALL, and seven of 11 patients with B-ALL or Burkitt's lymphoma achieved a complete remission. The median duration of remission was 24 months. Overall survival for the whole group was 35% at 5 years. The disease-free survival was 45% at 5 years. Long-term survival for patients with B or T-ALL was approximately 60%, compared with 15% for those with common or pre B-ALL. Short term intensive courses including intermediate or high dose Ara-C during remission and consolidation treatment lead to results comparable to those obtained with long-term maintenance regimens. Our regimen may be sufficient for patients with T or B-ALL. Larger randomized studies are needed to investigate the relative importance of our observations.

The long-term results in 130 patients with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia treated with continuous infusion high-dose ara-C (1.5 gm/m2/day x 4 days, CIHDAC) were compared with those in 264 patients treated in previous studies with standard dose ara-C (70-90 mg/m2/d x 7 days) plus either adriamycin (Ad-OAP), or amsacrine (AMSA-OAP). All patients have been followed at least 5 years. Patients in first CR at 5 years (FCR5) treated on protocols prior to CIHDAC had only 5% chance of relapse (median subsequent follow-up of 9 years). Therefore, we considered patients in FCR5 potentially cured. The two groups were similar with respect to known prognostic factors and CR rates. Although remission duration and survival were shorter with CIHDAC than Ad-OAP/AMSA-OAP, the percent of patients potentially cured was similar (10 vs. 15%). Marked differences between regimens were seen in inv(16) and t(15;17) patients. CIHDAC was better for patients with inv(16) with more patients in FCR5 (80 vs. 38%), longer remission duration and survival, and lower incidence of CNS relapse (0 vs. 43%). The Ad-OAP/AMSA-OAP protocols were superior in patients with t(15;17). We also measured steady-state ara-CTP concentrations (ara-CTPss) in 54 CIHDAC-treated patients presenting with high-blast count. While there was no correlation between ara-CTPss and response duration, all five patients in FCR5 in whom ara-CTPss was measured had high concentrations. These data support the concept that patients with AML should be treated differently according to cytogenetics. Inv(16) patients should be treated with high-dose ara-C while t(15;17) should rely more on anthracycline exposure.

Twenty-five consecutive leukemia patients (21 AML, 4 ALL) with either primary resistance (n = 22) or resistant relapse (n = 3) of all FAB subtypes were treated with 1 or 2 cycles of ID-ara C (1 g/m2 i.v. q 12 h, days 1-6) and AMSA (120 mg/m2 i.v., days 5-7). Patients reaching CR received 1 cycle of intensive consolidation using ara C 3 g/m2 i.v. q 12 h, days 1-4 and AMSA 120 mg/m2 i.v., day 5. Two patients received an allograft thereafter and are still alive and in CCR. CR was achieved in 12/25 patients (48%), ten after 1 cycle of induction and two after 2 cycles; 10/22 patients with primary resistant disease reached CR, and 2/3 with resistant relapse. Nine patients remained refractory (36%) and four died during hypoplasia (16%). Median DFS of the 12 responders was 2.9 months, median survival from time of CR 8.9 months. Median overall survival of responders and nonresponders was 6 months from time of resistance. Survival advantage of responding patients (n = 12) as compared with nonresponders (n = 13) was 10.7 vs. 3.2 months (p = 0.002). Toxicity of chemotherapy was acceptable: one patient experienced pulmonary edema due to ara C; two patients developed life-threatening systemic fungal infections, one of whom died while in CR.

This clinical trial was designed to evaluate the role of high-dose cytarabine (ara-C) in the treatment of adults with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in first relapse. We also tested the hypothesis that the selective use of AMSA (100 mg/m2/d on days 7, 8 and 9) would increase the complete remission (CR) rate when leukaemia cells remained in the bone marrow immediately following 6 d of Ara-C (2-3 g/m2/12 h) alone. Of 155 patients evaluable for response, 115 (74%) experienced marked cytoreduction by day 6 and received no further induction chemotherapy; 53 (45%) of these patients achieved CR after one course and 45 (38%) had resistant disease. The 36 patients (23%) with inadequate cytoreduction after the 6 d of ara-C alone were randomly assigned either to no further chemotherapy (21 patients) or to 3 d of AMSA (15 patients). The CR rates after one course were 14% and 53%, respectively (P = 0.01), and the fractions with resistant disease were 76% and 40%, respectively. The fractional reduction of leukaemia cells in the day 6 bone marrow aspirate specimen (P < 0.0001) and the reduction in the leukaemia cell mass measured in the day 6 marrow biopsy (P = 0.001) were the strongest predictors for achieving CR versus having residual disease in univariate analyses. The median duration of remission was 5 months, but seven patients (10%) remain in CR after 30-92 + months. Among the 140 patients who received only the 6 d of ara-C, the pretreatment albumin (P = 0.002) and lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.01) levels were the strongest predictors of response in univariate analyses, but only the albumin remained significant (P = 0.01) in a stepwise logistic regression analysis. Those patients with albumin > 4.0 mg/dl and LDH < 125% of normal had a 71% CR rate, and only 16% had resistant disease. Thus, pretreatment characteristics and rapid cytoreductin in the day 6 bone marrow sample identified a favourable subset of patients with AML in first relapse, some of whom responded quite well to 6 d of ara-C alone and have had long disease-free remissions.

52 patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) were randomly assigned to receive a combination of high-dose cytosine arabinoside (HD Ara-C), 3 g/m2/d and either mitoxantrone (MTX), 7 mg/m2/d (5 mg if older than 60 yr) or m-amsacrine (AMSA), 120 mg/m2/d (90 mg if older than 60 yr) for 5 d. The overall response rate was 50% and did not differ significantly in the two groups (46% for AMSA and 56% for MTX, p = 0.415). The median survival was 11 months (8 months for AMSA and 12 months for MTX, p = 0.326) and the median duration of complete remission (CR) was 11 months for AMSA and 12 months for MTX (p = 0.643). In relapsed patients, the only significant predictive factor for obtaining a complete response was the length of first complete remission. Patients with a first CR shorter than 6 months had a CR rate of 36% while it was 65% if the first CR lasted more than 6 months (p = 0.03). Severe (WHO grade III-IV) gastro-intestinal toxicity was more frequent in the AMSA group (27% vs 4%, p = 0.021). Treatment-related death occurred in 4 patients in the AMSA group and in 2 patients in the MTX group (p = 0.097). We conclude that neither of these two treatment modalities was shown to be superior in terms of CR rate and survival, with a better tolerance for MTX.

We evaluated relationships between ara-CTP pharmacokinetics in myeloblasts, response, and karyotype in 147 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated on three protocols each initiated by a 3 g/m2 ara-C dose given over 2 h. Area under the curve of ara-CTP concentration times time (AUC) or peak ara-CTP concentration after this dose did not predict response or response duration, suggesting that inability to form ara-CTP is an unlikely mechanism of ara-C resistance. Following high-dose bolus ara-C therapy patients with INV [16] or del [16q] had long remissions despite low AUC and peak values while patients with -5, del [5q], -7, or del [7q] were frequently resistant despite average AUC and peak values. In 55 patients treated with high-dose continuous infusion ara-C as a single agent, steady-state ara-CTP concentrations were significantly lower in resistant patients (who again were disproportionately those with -5, del [5q], -7, or del [7q]) although there was no correlation with CR duration.

A series of 46 patients with acute leukaemia were treated with amsacrine (m-AMSA) and cytosine arabinoside (ara-C). Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 15 of 38 (40%) patients with acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML) and 4 of 8 (50%) patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). The CR rate was significantly higher (P less than 0.05) for the younger, previously treated patients with AML (9/16) than for the older previously untreated ones (6/22), because of higher treatment mortality in the latter group. Myelosuppression was prolonged and profound. Major nonhaematological toxicity affected the gastrointestinal tract (nausea, vomiting, mucositis, bleeding and ileus associated with severe diarrhoea). Many patients also developed reversible hepatic dysfunction and two elderly patients died of cardiac arrhythmia. Further trials of this combination are justified in patients with relapsed or resistant leukaemia, but for older patients dose reduction is recommended.

High dose cytarabine (HDARAC) therapy is used increasingly to treat hematologic malignancies. Recent data indicate that HDARAC at doses of 2-3 g/M2 every 12 hr x 10-12 doses is of comparable or greater efficacy in remission induction as standard doses of cytarabine in acute myelogenous leukemia. HDARAC can also produce remissions in individuals resistant to conventional doses. HDARAC-containing regimens are reported to result in substantially higher long-term, disease-free survival than previous approaches to post-remission therapy, but this has not yet been confirmed in controlled trials. HDARAC is also active in acute lymphocytic leukemia. Because intravenous HDARAC achieves high levels in the spinal fluid, it is useful to treat central nervous system leukemia and may provide adequate CNS prophylaxis in acute lymphocytic leukemia. HDARAC is reported to be active in advanced non-Hodgkin lymphomas and chronic myelogenous leukemia in acute phase; optimal use in these settings is under study. HDARAC has also been combined with other drugs. Randomized trials are needed to determine whether these combinations are more effective than HDARAC alone. Apart from potent myelosuppression, the dose-limiting toxicity of HDARAC is cerebellar damage. This occurs with increased frequency in patients greater than 50 years old. HDARAC is active in hematologic malignancies and may further improve therapeutic results if combined with other drugs.

During A-ALL induction treatment, HD-ara-C (2.5 g/m2 IV, day 1), does not produce any beneficial effect, whereas the hematologic toxicity is increased. A 3-month consolidation phase comprising intermittent MTX, ara-C and 6-TG is not significantly affecting either DFI or survival in A-ALL. The association of HD-ara-C and m-AMSA appears to be a promising salvage therapy for the 20% A-ALL refractory to first induction therapy. The quality of autologous bone marrow graft, harvested after HD-ara-C, seems to be impaired as suggested by a delayed recovery of PMN and platelets. HD-ara-C (3 g/m2 X N) given the days before cyclophosphamide and TBI as conditioning treatment for BMT does not seem to induce prohibitory additional toxicity. Whether HD-ara-C was given four to six times or eight to 12 times gave no significant difference in early toxicity.

Twenty nine consecutive patients (pts) with either relapsed (n = 23) or primary refractory AML (n = 6) were treated with 1 or 2 cycles of intermediate-dose (ID) ara-C (1g/m2 IV q 12 h days 1-6) and m-AMSA (120 mg/m2 IV days 5-7). Pts reaching complete remission (CR) were consolidated with 1 cycle of ara-C 3 g/m2 IV q 12 h days 1-4 and m-AMSA 120 mg/m2 IV day 5. The median duration of the preceding remission was 9.5 months, median time from last chemotherapy until relapse 3 months. 18/23 (78%) of relapsed pts achieved CR regardless of the type of prior intensive maintenance (HD-ara-C/m-AMSA/5-AZA or DNR/CD-ara-C). 3/23 (13%) pts died during hypoplasia, 2/23 (9%) pts were refractory to 2x ID-ara-C/m-AMSA. 3/23 pts died in CR during hypoplasia after intensive consolidation with HD-ara-C. Predictive factors for remission were the duration of preceding remission and the time from last chemotherapy to relapse. Three pts were transplanted in 2nd CR. 1/6 refractory pts reached CR, 2 pts remained refractory, and 3 died during hypoplasia. The median duration of disease-free survival (DFS) of relapsed pts was 3.3 months without further treatment, median survival of responding pts (18 replased pts, 1 refractory pt) was 4.6 months, the overall survival (n = 29) was 4.8 months. Pts receiving BMT were censured at the time of BMT. Seven pts experienced lung toxicity due to ara-C, four of whom died. The incidence of lung toxicity was clearly related to the extent of ara-C pretreatment during intensive maintenance. In conclusion, ID-ara-C/m-AMSA is a very effective reinduction treatment in these pts with acceptable toxicity; the impact of HD-ara-C during consolidation for DFS and survival is questionable.

Ninety-six patients with de novo acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) were randomized to receive either daunorubicin (50 mg/m2, IV) on days 1-3; cytarabine (Ara-C) (25 mg/m2, IV) bolus, followed by 160 mg/m2 as a continuous IV infusion daily for 5 days and 6-thioguanine (6-TG) (100 mg/m2 po) every 12 hr daily for 5 days (DAT); or amsacrine (190 mg/m2, IV) on days 1-3 with Ara-C and 6-TG at the above doses (AAT). Patients achieving complete remission (CR) then received two courses of consolidation therapy with the same combination that had induced remission but at slightly reduced total doses. Patients less than or equal to age 40 with an HLA-identical sibling donor underwent allogeneic transplantation, usually after consolidation therapy. The remaining patients were then randomized to receive either maintenance therapy (alternating cycles of vincristine/methotrexate, cyclophosphamide/6-TG, daunorubicin/hydroxyurea and Ara-C/6-TG) or no further treatment. Ninety-two patients were evaluable for response. Twenty-five of the 46 patients (54%) who received DAT and 32 of the 46 patients (70%) who received AAT achieved CR (p = 0.13). When patients were stratified by age, however, remission induction advantage with AAT became statistically significant (p = 0.03). Additionally, more patients achieved CR following one course of AAT than following one course of DAT (48% vs 28%, p = 0.03). Overall survival in the AAT group was improved as well (p = 0.01). Too few patients were randomized on the maintenance arm of the protocol to make interpretation meaningful. Non-hematologic toxicity was generally comparable in both arms. In conclusion, patients with de novo ANLL who received AAT had a higher remission incidence and slightly longer survival compared to patients who received DAT. Further investigation of this drug combination in untreated patients with ANLL is warranted.

Sixty-four patients underwent 66 remission induction courses with intermediate-dose cytosine-arabinoside (Ara-C) for treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or high-grade malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The Ara-C was administered in combination with amsacrine with or without VP16-213 and prednisone. After complete remission was achieved, 27 patients received 38 consolidation courses consisting of high-dose Ara-C either alone or in combination with amsacrine with or without VP16-213 and prednisone. Seven (11%) of 66 induction courses and eight (21%) of 38 consolidation courses were complicated by respiratory failure that was considered a pulmonary reaction to Ara-C therapy. The initial findings on chest radiographs in the 15 cases included a diffuse interstitial pattern (two), a mixed interstitial-alveolar pattern (eight), an alveolar pattern (three), and a normal pattern (two). In 11 cases, the abnormalities were diffuse throughout both lungs with a preference for the lower lobes in five. The changes were localized in two cases. A small pleural effusion was observed in two patients. In the majority of cases, the initial radiographic changes progressed to a predominantly alveolar pattern. Thirteen patients recovered clinically within 2-9 days, and two patients died of pulmonary complications. Radiologic recovery took 7-21 days. Rapid regression of alveolar consolidations within 3-7 days was the first sign of radiologic improvement. The interstitial pattern gradually regressed. We conclude that the spectrum of radiologic abnormalities in cases of pulmonary reaction to Ara-C therapy includes diffuse interstitial, mixed interstitial-alveolar, or alveolar pulmonary changes.