1. Pharmacokinetic variability of CFTR modulators from standard and alternative regimens.
- Author
-
Rose NR, Chalamalla AR, Garcia BA, Krick S, Bergeron J, Sadeghi H, Schellhase DE, Ryan KJ, Dowell AE, Acosta EP, and Guimbellot JS
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Chloride Channel Agonists pharmacokinetics, Chloride Channel Agonists therapeutic use, Chloride Channel Agonists administration & dosage, Chromatography, Liquid, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Pyrazoles pharmacokinetics, Pyrazoles administration & dosage, Pyrazoles therapeutic use, Pyridines pharmacokinetics, Pyridines administration & dosage, Pyridines therapeutic use, Pyrroles pharmacokinetics, Pyrroles administration & dosage, Quinolines, Aminophenols pharmacokinetics, Aminophenols administration & dosage, Aminophenols therapeutic use, Benzodioxoles pharmacokinetics, Benzodioxoles administration & dosage, Cystic Fibrosis drug therapy, Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator genetics, Drug Combinations, Indoles pharmacokinetics, Indoles administration & dosage, Quinolones pharmacokinetics, Quinolones administration & dosage, Quinolones therapeutic use, Tandem Mass Spectrometry
- Abstract
Elexacaftor, tezacaftor, ivacaftor (ETI) is a CFTR modulator combination approved for use in ∼90 % of people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) over 2 years old. While most pwCF tolerate this therapy well, some are intolerant to standard dosing, and others show little response. Clinical providers may adjust ETI dosing to combat these issues, but these adjustments are not well guided by pharmacokinetic evidence. Our post-approval study aimed to describe pharmacokinetic variability of ETI plasma concentrations in 15 participants who were administered a standard or reduced dose. ETI were quantified by LC-MS/MS in plasma samples taken prior to the morning dose. Results showed non-significant differences for each compound regardless of dosing regimen and after dose equivalence normalization. The majority of participants in both dosing groups had concentrations expected to elicit clinical response to ETI therapy. These findings indicate that dose reduction may be a viable strategy to maintain clinical benefit while managing intolerance., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Guimbellot reports consulting fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, outside the submitted work. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF