Search

Abstract: Cyclosporine (CsA) microemulsion has been the mainstay immunosuppressive agent for renal transplant recipients for years. A single daily dosing of cyclosporine (SD) is rarely used. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of SD versus twice daily dosing of CsA. Retrospective evaluation of SD use was conducted for 44 renal transplant recipients for 12 months (study group). Equal numbers of matched recipients were selected for age, sex, HLA mismatch, donor type, and immunosuppressive regimen (control group). We measured CsA trough (C0) and peak (C2) blood levels, 12-hour CsA profile, and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). There were significant differences in C0, C2, and calculated AUC after shifting to SD. In the study group, the mean AUC was 4619 ng/mL/h before versus 6567 ng/mL/h after shifting to SD (P = .004). This became more therapeutic and identical to the mean AUC in the control group, which was 6551 ng/mL/h. Total daily CsA dose was significantly lower in the study group compared with the control group (P < .0001). A significantly higher incidence of hepatitis was observed among the study group (P = .011). There were significantly fewer adverse effects in patients in the study group than the control group. There were no significant differences in graft and patient outcomes between the groups. We concluded that CsA dose should be individualized in renal transplant recipients especially if they have viral hepatitis. SD has the advantage of decreasing dosage and CsA-related adverse effects while maintaining optimal graft function. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Introduction: Cyclosporine microemulsion has been the mainstay immunosuppressive agent in renal transplantation for years. Since single daily dosing of cyclosporine is rarely used, the objective of this investigation was to evaluate the efficacy of a single daily dose versus twice daily dosing of cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients. Methods: Retrospective evaluation of single-dose cyclosporine use was conducted for 15 renal transplant recipients for 12 months (study group). Equal numbers of matched renal transplant recipients were selected for age, sex, human leukocyte antigen mismatch, donor type, and immunosuppressive regimen (control group). Cyclosporine trough level and peak cyclosporine blood levels, 12-hour cyclosporine profile, and the area under the concentration-time curve were measured. Results: There was a significant difference in cyclosporine peak blood level and calculated area under the curve after shifting to single-dose cyclosporine (P = .001). In the study group, the mean area under the curve was significantly below the average therapeutic range before (3154 ng/mL/ho) versus 5532 ng/mL/h after shifting to the single-dose regimen (which was therapeutic). This value was 5749 ng/mL/h in the control group. Total daily cyclosporine dose was lower in the study group when compared with the control group at 6 and 12 months (P = .01). There were significantly fewer adverse effects in patients in the study group than in patients in the control group. Conclusion: We conclude that although cyclosporine dose should be individualized in renal transplant recipients, a single dose of cyclosporine has the added advantage of decreasing dosages and cyclosporine-related adverse effects while maintaining optimal graft function. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: The area under the concentration-time curve of cyclosporine microemulsion is the best measure of the absorption and beneficial effects in renal transplant recipients. We sought to determine the best method of monitoring cyclosporine levels in these patients. Methods: Prospective evaluation of peak cyclosporine blood levels and area under the curve monitoring were performed for 1 year in 65 renal transplant recipients (study group). Cyclosporine trough levels and peak cyclosporine blood levels were correlated with the calculated area under the curve. Cyclosporine trough levels were monitored in equal numbers of matched controls. Results: There were no significant differences in the incidence of acute rejection, cyclosporine nephrotoxicity, proteinuria, serum creatinine levels, or graft and patient outcomes between the groups (P = .1). Peak cyclosporine blood levels guided by calculating the area under the curve were found to be 27% to 32% lower than previously reported. The correlation coefficient was <70% for cyclosporine trough levels (P < .02) and >90% for peak cyclosporine blood levels (P < .001) when related to the calculated area under the curve. The calculated area under the curve was approximately 6000 ng/mL/h following transplantation, gradually decreasing to approximately 3000 ng/mL/h at 1 year. Both appeared to the acceptable therapeutic values. Conclusion: Calculating the area under the curve using trough and peak blood levels versus using isolated readings for either of these levels alone is the most effective method of monitoring cyclosporine in recipients undergoing renal transplant. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Hyperinfection strongyloidiasis is a potentially fatal syndrome associated with conditions of depressed host cellular immunity. A high degree of suspicion is required to detect cases early and thereby avoid a fatal outcome. Patients and Methods: Three consecutive cadaveric kidney transplant recipients died within 2 months from hyperinfections with strongyloides. All members of the transplant team were involved in a campaign to localize the source of infection, identify and treat affected patients, and provide adequate prophylaxis to other transplant recipients. We reviewed cadaveric donor files and screened 61 hospital personnel, 27 hospital inpatients, and the 87 hospital outpatients transplanted in a year’s time before that event for a possible source. The screening test included analysis of fresh stool samples on 3 consecutive days for strongyloides larvae. The anti-helminthic drug albendazol was administered to all patients during screening. They were followed for possible development of the disease during the infectivity period. Results: The first 2 recipients received their kidneys from 1 cadaveric donor, while the third received it from a different donor. Both donors came from areas endemic for strongyloidiasis. The 3 recipients were on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. The twin recipient of the second kidney was on cyclosporine and did not manifest a disease. All stool samples taken for screening were negative for the infective larvae. None of the other recipients developed the disease. Conclusions: Cadaveric donors were the possible source for this outbreak. Cyclosporine probably has a protective effect against strongyloides. In our setting, screening of cadaveric donors for strongyloides is mandatory before accepting them for donation, and oral prophylaxis is required for all recipients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Introduction: Early acute rejection episodes (ARE) have deleterious effects on graft outcomes. The incidence of ARE in the first 3 months has been reported to be <20%. In a recent audit of ARE among 100 renal transplants, we observed the rates to be high (30%). We retrospectively collected details of donor type, induction therapy, immunosuppression medications, drug levels, HLA mismatches, acute tubular necrosis (ATN), and delayed graft function (DGF) to correlate with ARE and response to therapy. Results: Thirty rejection episodes occurred after a mean period of 14.3 days after transplantation. Ninety-one patients had induction treatment with either antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or interleukin 2 receptor antibodies (IL2 Rab). The drugs included cyclosporine, mycophenolate, sirolimus, azathioprine, and prednisolone in these patients. There was no significant difference in ARE among the different drug protocols (30.7%–35.2%). Subjects with 4 or more HLA mismatches displayed more ARE (40.3%) compared with those with 3 or less (23%). Subjects with ATN or DGF immediately posttransplantation had a higher incidence of ARE (39.2%) than those without them (26.3%). Deceased donor recipients had a higher episode of ARE (45.1%) compared with live related donor recipients (25%). On stratifying the known risk factors for ARE, subjects with no risk factors had the least (22.2%) ARE compared with those with one (32.5%) or two (47.6%) risk factors. Subjects who failed to achieve adequate cyclosporine (C2) levels showed significantly higher rates of ARE (86.9%) than those with adequate or higher levels (8.6%). Conclusion: Higher HLA mismatches, DGF, deceased donor, and failure to achieve adequate cyclosporine levels were observed to be major risk factors for the development of ARE. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]