Search

Theory: Elective courses, by definition, allow medical students to self-select for participation in the class. In a small-group learning setting, students uninterested or not ready for a particular learning topic might change the educational experience ("poison the well") for those students most interested in the topic. It is not known how medical students required to take a course in humanism (that they otherwise would not have elected to take) might be impacted by the course or how their presence might affect students originally interested in the course., Hypotheses: Medical students in a required course on humanism and values in medicine will have different experiences based on whether a particular student might have or not have elected to enroll in the course. Students uninterested in taking a course in humanism and values, but required to enroll, will limit the benefit of the course for those students originally interested in participating., Method: In 2012, all 1st-year students at a U.S. medical school were required to take the Healer's Art, an elective on professional values and humanism offered at more than 90 other schools in the United States and internationally. Students completed pre/postcourse surveys assessing emotional exhaustion, work engagement, positive emotions, and cynicism. We analyzed differences between those who would have elected to take the course (Elective students) and those who would not have elected to take it (Required students)., Results: Elective students did not differ from Required students in baseline demographic characteristics, emotional exhaustion, work engagement, or positive emotions. At baseline, Elective students did report feeling safer to talk openly, a greater sense of community, and higher levels of cynicism. Over time, there were no differences in course evaluations or outcomes between Elective and Required students., Conclusions: Required students do not differ greatly from those who would have elected to take Healer's Art, and all students appear to have similar experiences in the course.

Background: Medical teachers report both positive and negative experiences, but these impacts are not well understood. In particular, the experience of faculty in relationship-centered education is unknown., Purposes: We sought to assess the benefits to teachers of the Healer's Art, a popular international medical school elective course., Methods: We performed quantitative and qualitative analyses of course evaluations completed by 2009-10 Healer's Art faculty from 17 schools., Results: Ninety-nine of 117 faculty (84.6%) completed the evaluation. No differences in quantitative responses based on gender, specialty, medical school, or year of graduation were observed. Respondents were likely or very likely to agree that the course was useful, positively impacted clinical work and teaching, and increased overall commitment to teaching. In describing the benefits of teaching in the Healer's Art, faculty emphasized four themes: Personal Response to Medicine, Professional Growth, Greater Connection, and Greater Empathy and Respect for Students., Conclusions: Healer's Art faculty report personal and professional benefits, as well as increased commitment to teaching and to a relationship-centered educational process.

Although professionalism has emerged as a key competency for today's physicians, there exists little insight into how best to teach medical students the relevant skills or instill in them the commitment required to practice according to the highest professional standards. Ten UCSF medical students were interviewed at three time points (second, third, and fourth years of school). Interviews focused on students' learning and development regarding end-of-life care (EOLC). Students described varying steps in their professional development from their second to fourth years of school, including feeling confused about the definition of professionalism and integrating their personal and professional identities. In addition to professional development, four other themes contributed to the development of medical student understanding of how to provide EOLC as a professional: (1) curricular discordance, (2) role models, (3) the tightrope between trained versus human reactions, and (4) ethical dilemmas. These five themes represent dilemmas that students often learned how to respond to over the course of school. Professional development in EOLC required the acquisition of skills necessary to balance the tension between and navigate conflicting messages present in medical student training.

Background: Medical student end-of-life care training provides insight into the hidden curriculum and physician professional development., Description: Second-year medical students at a university medical center listen to a panel discussion of 4th-year students and residents describing their end-of-life care experiences during clerkships. This discussion is intended to provide "anticipatory guidance" to 2nd-year students about challenging situations they might encounter on the wards. The purpose of this study was to analyze the content of the panel discussions by 4th-year students and residents to better understand their views of the end-of-life care curriculum., Evaluation: We performed a qualitative content analysis of transcripts from 2 years of panel discussions. Participants' comments focused primarily on the complexity of the role of medical students in end-of-life care. Three major themes emerged in the sessions: defining professional identity, conflicting expectations, and limited medical experience., Conclusions: The role of medical students in end-of-life care can be complex, confusing, and contradictory. Emotional support and elucidating the hidden curriculum may assist students with the process of physician enculturation and end-of-life care education.

Background: Efforts to promote medical professionalism often focus on cognitive and technical competencies, rather than professional identity, commitment, and values. The Healer's Art elective is designed to create a genuine community of inquiry into these foundational elements of professionalism., Objective: Evaluations were obtained to characterize course impact and to understand students' conceptions of professionalism., Design: Qualitative analysis of narrative course evaluation responses., Participants: Healer's Art students from U.S. and Canadian medical schools., Approach: Analysis of common themes identified in response to questions about course learning, insights, and utility., Results: In 2003-2004, 25 schools offered the course. Evaluations were obtained from 467 of 582 students (80.2%) from 22 schools participating in the study. From a question about what students learned about the practice of medicine from the Healer's Art, the most common themes were "definition of professionalism in medicine" and "legitimizing humanism in medicine." The most common themes produced by a question about the most valuable insights gained in the course were "relationship between physicians and patients" and "creating authentic community." The most common themes in response to a question about course utility were "creating authentic community" and "filling a curricular gap.", Conclusions: In legitimizing humanistic elements of professionalism and creating a safe community, the Healer's Art enabled students to uncover the underlying values and meaning of their work--an opportunity not typically present in required curricula. Attempts to teach professionalism should address issues of emotional safety and authentic community as prerequisites to learning and professional affiliation.