Search

Introduction. The relevance of the research is determined by the ambivalence of applying scientific knowledge, which can bring humanitygood and great harm. However, the issue is not science or scientific knowledge itself, but in whose hands it is, what social interests arebehind it, what social and state structures direct its development, and according to which values. That is, the answer to the questions of thestrategic development of science must certainly lie in its value, and moral dimension. The aim and tasks are a study of the specifics ofscience in the context of its moral dimension in the conditions of modern civilizational progress of mankind. Research methods. Themethodological strategy of the research is based on socio-cultural, cultural-historical, systemic, and comparative methodologicalapproaches in their dialectical unity. Research results. It is important that science, as a part of the culture, is guided by socio-culturalvalues in its development and does not lose touch with the real history of society. The problem of the relationship between science andmorality is correlated with the relationship between science and practical activity. This problem also actualizes the social responsibilityrequirement of the scientific community not only for the direct result of the research but also for its practical use in various subsystems ofsociety and social life. Science needs social control to be oriented to the service of social progress because, beyond social and moral use,scientific knowledge loses its cultural and humanistic dimension. Discussion. In the discussion, the author examines the issue of therelationship between science and religion, which is an important component of the issue of the relationship between science and morality.Conclusion. The main value criterion of modern scientific knowledge is the emphasis on the awareness of the socially significant limits oftheoretical research, supplementing it with cultural and ethical parameters and humanistic guidelines. The value imperative largelydetermines the specifics of the professional ethics of the scientist himself, in particular, it presents a number of requirements for the ethics ofthe process of scientific creativity and dictates some moral norms of the scientist's creative activity. It is worth remembering that science isnot an end in itself, it must serve man, his good. У статті проведено дослідження специфіки науки в контексті її морального виміру. Приймаючи думку, щонаукове знання в сучасному світі виступає головним фактором цивілізаційного розвитку, зокрема технологічного,здійснюючи у такий спосіб найбільший вплив на цивілізаційний вибір, автор досліджує залежність між специфікоюнаукового знання та соціокультурними наслідками його використання, визнаючи ключову роль морально-ціннісноговиміру науки. В контексті розкриття теми статті автор також розглядає питання співвідношення науки і релігії,яке є важливою складовою питання співвідношення науки та моралі

Introduction. The timeliness of the study is determined by the global nature of the problems in the development of modern society. The current global problems are the result of a certain development strategy, and, above all, a certain type of worldview that has developed in a particular historical period. Therefore, the solution of existing problems is associated with finding the optimal worldview, which, in turn, determines the specifics of the knowledge base of socio-cultural activities (the specifics of worldview and instrumental knowledge). The aim and tasks are a study of the specifics of knowledge in the context of socio-cultural development. Research methods: The methodological strategy of the research is based on socio-cultural, cultural-historical, systemic and comparative methodological approaches in their dialectical unity. Research results. In each historical epoch, a certain type of worldview is formed, which determines the specifics of human activity. There is a certain relationship between worldview knowledge, which is the basis of a certain type of worldview-orientation, and instrumental knowledge, which is designed in accordance with this type of worldview. Such interdependence of worldview and instrumental knowledge has a decisive influence on the specifics of socio-cultural development in general and the relevant era in particular. Discussion examines the specifics of knowledge used in the field of social relations in Antiquity. Conclusion. The knowledge basis of socio-cultural activity is worldview and instrumental knowledge, the specificity of which is determined by a certain type of worldview that has developed in different historical periods. В статті проведено дослідження специфіки, місця та ролі знання у соціокультурному розвитку. Приймаючи думку, що в кожну історичну епоху складається певний тип світовідношення, який і визначає специфіку діяльності людини, автор дослі-джує залежність між світоглядним знанням, яке є основою певного типу світовідношення, та інструментальним знанням, що оформлюється відповідно до даного типу світовідношення. Така взаємозалежність світоглядного та інструментального знан-ня, на думку автора, здійснює визначальний вплив на специфіку соціокультурного розвитку загалом та відповідної епохи зокрема.

The article highlights the characteristic features and the main cause-and-effect relationship of university campuses with the urban environment and, in particular, their purely functional content with science, education, living, recreation, which is carried out in an architectural-spatial environment. The article examines the historical context and the main stages of the development of student campuses in order to study the patterns of campus formation in accordance with the socio-cultural development of society. Foreign and domestic experience are considered. Current trends in the development of student campuses are briefly identified. Formulation of the problem. The latest level of civilization in the development of society determines the need for close attention to the development of science, modern educational technologies. A society that imitates the transition of industrial development is in the post-industrial period and makes the transition to the information society, needs the latest organization of education and, accordingly, the formation of the latest architectural and planning structures of university complexes. Modern technology parks, which are the newest multifunctional architectural and planning formations, began the development of this system of student campuses, aimed at overcoming the socio-economic crisis of the postwar period of the 50s and launched the latest system of urban planning, where education, science, housing, commercial and technological activities are located in a compact settlement, which fully contributes to the goal of intensifying science and economics. Modern university complexes also have their own civilizational mission of progress, which requires the implementation of the task of continuing education within the purposefully formed urban and architectural spatial planning structures of campuses. Comfortable living, conditions of continuing education, places of public space, conditions for maintaining a healthy physical shape, cultural development - a necessary basis for the implementation of the program of continuing development and education., У статті висвітлюються риси і основний причинно-наслідковий зв'язок університетських містечок з міським середовищем і, зокрема, з їх суто функціональною наповненістю наукою, освітою, проживанням, оздоровленням, відпочинком, здійсненою в архітектурно-просторовому середовищі. В статті розглянуто історичний контекст та основні етапи розвитку студентських містечок з метою вивчення закономірностей формування кампуса у відповідності із соціокультурним розвитком суспільства. Розглянуто закордонний та вітчизняний досвід. Коротко визначені сучасні тенденції розвитку студентських містечок.