Search

Objective: Two studies identified core value influences on medical decision-making processes across and within cultures., Methods: In Study 1, Japanese and American adults reported desired levels of medical decision-making influence across conditions that varied in seriousness. Cultural antecedents (interdependence, independence, and power distance) were also measured. In Study 2, American adults reviewed a colorectal cancer screening decision aid. Decision preparedness was measured along with interdependence, independence, and desire for medical information., Results: In Study 1, higher interdependence predicted stronger desire for decision-making information in both countries, but was significantly stronger in Japan. The path from information desire to decision-making influence desire was significant only in Japan. The independence path to desire for decision-making influence was significant only in the United States. Power distance effects negatively predicted desire for decision-making influence only in the United States. For Study 2, high (low) interdependents and women (men) in the United States felt that a colorectal cancer screening decision aid helped prepare them more (less) for a medical consultation. Low interdependent men were at significantly higher risk for low decision preparedness., Conclusions: Study 1 suggests that Japanese participants may tend to view medical decision-making influence as an interdependent, information sharing exchange, whereas American respondents may be more interested in power sharing that emphasizes greater independence. Study 2 demonstrates the need to assess value influences on medical decision-making processes within and across cultures and suggests that individually tailored versions of decision aids may optimize decision preparedness., ((c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).)

Three studies examine the effectiveness of social norm messaging in a green consumption context. The overall goal is to identify theory-based ways to increase consumer choice of biodegradable take-out food packaging with an extra charge versus single-use plastic with no charge in the US and South Korea. Results indicate that descriptive norm messaging is superior to prescriptive norm messaging in both countries. Prescriptive norm messaging produced significantly higher reactance and more negative attitudes toward the packaging selection experience in the US, suggesting serious backfire effects in that country, but not in South Korea. Results advance theory regarding the use of social norm messaging to increase consumers' willingness to pay an additional charge for take-out food packaging that is biodegradable versus single-use plastic. Managerial and policy implications are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale Do culturally targeted patient decision aids (DAs) better prepare lower-middle and middle-class Hispanic American women for medical decision making compared to DAs designed for the general population? Health promotion evidence indicates that inclusion of cultural values, imagery, linguistics, and health data in a DA will improve ethnic patients' preparation relative to a generic DA; yet, this hypothesis remains untested. Method Four experiments examined consultation preparation effects of culturally targeted versus generic DAs for Hispanic women living in the United States. Drawing on highly rated online DAs, an experienced Hispanic content developer and Hispanic focus groups worked with researchers to develop culturally targeted digital DAs. Online panels of self-identified Hispanic women in the U.S. were randomly assigned to a targeted or generic DA as part of a scenario-based physician consultation for advanced diabetes (Study 1) or early stage breast cancer (Studies 2–4). Results Manipulation checks showed high awareness of cultural information in the targeted DA group. Despite efforts to rule out confounds that could account for null effects, DA cultural targeting did not increase knowledge, decision preparedness, or empowerment or reduce decision conflict in the four randomized experiments. Only individual difference variables (e.g., group interdependence) consistently predicted enhanced DA consultation preparation effects. Related research indicates that culture at the group level may exert less influence when individuals think deliberatively, feel less constrained by limited resources such as time, understand processing objectives, and/or are primed with task-specific schema/norms. Conclusion Given deeper deliberation and clearly primed processing objectives, personal experiences and task-related schema/norms may have significantly reduced the effects of cultural targeting. Consistent findings from four studies suggest that culturally targeted DAs may not better prepare Hispanic women in the U.S. for medical decision making than generic versions designed for the broader population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Patient decision aids are known to positively impact outcomes critical to shared decision making (SDM), such as gist knowledge and decision preparedness. However, research on the potential improvement of these and other important outcomes through cultural targeting and tailoring of decision aids is very limited. This is the case despite extensive evidence supporting use of cultural targeting and tailoring to improve the effectiveness of health communications. Building on prominent psychological theory, we propose a two-stage framework incorporating cultural concepts into the design process for screening and treatment decision aids. The first phase recommends use of cultural constructs, such as collectivism and individualism, to differentially target patients whose cultures are known to vary on these dimensions. Decision aid targeting is operationalized through use of symbols and values that appeal to members of the given culture. Content dimensions within decision aids that appear particularly appropriate for targeting include surface level visual characteristics, language, beliefs, attitudes and values. The second phase of the framework is based on evidence that individuals vary in terms of how strongly cultural norms influence their approach to problem solving and decision making. In particular, the framework hypothesizes that differences in terms of access to cultural mindsets (e.g., access to interdependent versus independent self) can be measured up front and used to tailor decision aids. Thus, the second phase in the framework emphasizes the importance of not only targeting decision aid content, but also tailoring the information to the individual based on measurement of how strongly he/she is connected to dominant cultural mindsets. Overall, the framework provides a theory-based guide for researchers and practitioners who are interested in using cultural targeting and tailoring to develop and test decision aids that move beyond a “one-size fits all” approach and thereby, improve SDM in our multicultural world. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

In 2018, Alden et al. showed that the desired degree of family involvement in medical decisions is an individual preference that is largely independent from East-West cultural stereotypes. At the same time, individual-level interdependence influenced whether patients preferred more individual or more family involvement in their decision making together with their medical care provider. The present study provides empirical evidence and adds evidence for Europe for which no such data previously existed. The present study is a direct replication and extension of the original Alden et al. (2018) study (N = 2031; Australia, China, Malaysia, India, South Korea, Thailand, United States [U.S.]), however, using survey data from four European countries (Austria, Belgium, Germany, Netherlands) and the United States (U.S.) with a total sample size of N = 2750. Random effects within-between models replicated the original primary finding that those with higher self-involvement in medical decision making preferred less family involvement. Furthermore, patients with lower self-independence, higher relational interdependence, and stronger beliefs in social hierarchy are more likely to want their families involved in medical decisions besides their health care provider. These observed relationships are largely consistent both within and across the four European countries and the U.S. In conclusion, the results point to the importance of avoiding cultural stereotypes and instead, recognizing that patient desires for family involvement in medical decision making vary dramatically within cultures depending on multiple individual differences. Furthermore, a growing body of evidence suggests that these antecedents of family involvement as well as the construct itself may be measurable in diverse cultures with high levels of confidence in their reliability and validity. • Family involvement in shared medical decision making can help improving health outcomes. • Cultural influences have been identified in Asia-Pacific region but not in Europe. • Direct replication of Alden et al. (2017) in four Central European countries and the USA. • Higher self-independence and stronger desire for self-involvement decrease family involvement. • Higher relational interdependence and stronger beliefs in social hierarchy increase family involvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]