Search

The pyloric network of decapod crustaceans has been intensively studied electrophysiologically in the infraorders Astacidea, Brachyura, and Palinura. The morphology of some or all pyloric neurons has been well described in Astacidea and Brachyura, but less so in Palinura. Given the large evolutionary distance between these three groups, and the large amount of electrophysiology that has been performed in palinuroid species, it is important to fill this gap. We describe here the gross morphology of all six pyloric neuron types in a palinuroid, P. interruptus. All pyloric neurons had complicated, extended dendritic trees that filled the majority of the neuropil, with most small diameter processes present in a shell near the surface of the ganglion. Certain neuron types showed modest preferences for somata location in the ganglion, but these differences were too weak to use as identifying characteristics. Quantitative measurements of secondary branch number, maximum branch order, total process length, and neuron somata diameter were also, in general, insufficient to distinguish among the neurons, although AB and LP neuron somata diameters differed from those of the other types. One neuron type (VD) had a distinctive neurite branching pattern consisting of a small initial branch followed shortly by a bifurcation of the main neurite. The processes arising from these two branches occupied largely non-overlapping neuropil. Electrophysiological recordings showed that each major branch had its own spike initiation zone and that, although the zones fired correlated spikes, they generated spikes independently. VD neurons in the other infraorders have similar morphologies, suggesting that having two arbors is important for the function of this neuron. These data are similar to those previously obtained in Brachyura and Astacidea. It thus appears that, despite their long evolutionary separation, neuron morphology in these three infraorders has not greatly diverged. Copyright © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The rhythmic pyloric network of the lobster stomatogastric system approximately maintains phase (that is, the burst durations and durations between the bursts of its neurons change proportionally) when network cycle period is altered by current injection into the network pacemaker (Hooper, 1997a,b). When isolated from the network and driven by rhythmic hyperpolarizing current pulses, the delay to firing after each pulse of at least one network neuron type [pyloric (PY)] varies in a phase-maintaining manner when cycle period is varied (Hooper, 1998). These variations require PY neurons to have intrinsic mechanisms that respond to changes in neuron activity on time scales at least as long as 2 s. Slowly activating and deactivating conductances could provide such a mechanism. We tested this possibility by building models containing various slow conductances. This work showed that such conductances could indeed support intrinsic phase maintenance, and we show here results for one such conductance, a slow potassium conductance. These conductances supported phase maintenance because their mean activation level changed, hence altering neuron postinhibition firing delay, when the rhythmic input to the neuron changed. Switching the sign of the dependence of slow-conductance activation and deactivation on membrane potential resulted in neuron delays switching to change in an anti-phase-maintaining manner. These data suggest that slow conductances or similar slow processes such as changes in intracellular Ca2+ concentration could underlie phase maintenance in pyloric network neurons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: This is the second in a series of canonical reviews on invertebrate muscle. We cover here thin and thick filament structure, the molecular basis of force generation and its regulation, and two special properties of some invertebrate muscle, catch and asynchronous muscle. Invertebrate thin filaments resemble vertebrate thin filaments, although helix structure and tropomyosin arrangement show small differences. Invertebrate thick filaments, alternatively, are very different from vertebrate striated thick filaments and show great variation within invertebrates. Part of this diversity stems from variation in paramyosin content, which is greatly increased in very large diameter invertebrate thick filaments. Other of it arises from relatively small changes in filament backbone structure, which results in filaments with grossly similar myosin head placements (rotating crowns of heads every 14.5nm) but large changes in detail (distances between heads in azimuthal registration varying from three to thousands of crowns). The lever arm basis of force generation is common to both vertebrates and invertebrates, and in some invertebrates this process is understood on the near atomic level. Invertebrate actomyosin is both thin (tropomyosin:troponin) and thick (primarily via direct Ca++ binding to myosin) filament regulated, and most invertebrate muscles are dually regulated. These mechanisms are well understood on the molecular level, but the behavioral utility of dual regulation is less so. The phosphorylation state of the thick filament associated giant protein, twitchin, has been recently shown to be the molecular basis of catch. The molecular basis of the stretch activation underlying asynchronous muscle activity, however, remains unresolved. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]